What's new

Meet the woman who killed over 100 ISIS men

Yup it is the same lady and yeah i did remove the picture. Thanks for concern. I am proud of this woman.

i hope her group and syrian intelligence find the dog who is holding her head... and do the same to him.
 
pkk may not be hardcore socialist like the baath movement or libyan jamahiriya or communist party of russia... pkk may want something called "kurdistan", but pkk fits more comfortably among socialists than with "nationalists"... as long as turkey exists as a nation, without the communist dream of humanity without nations, it is fair enough for pkk to talk of "greater kurdistan"... if you forget natiionalism, they will too... as for me, i am an actual socialist activist... been that for eleven years... i follow the "jamahiriya" socialist ideology from the libyan jamahiriya... please go through my posts here by doing "member search".

For your knowledge, PKK shifted it's policy long ago. They don't strive for Kurdistan anymore. They want a Kurdish autonomous region in Turkey.

Secondly, Kurdish population in Turkey are highly religious, they won't accept anything like socialism.

Ottoman Empire's binding power was ummah. When Turkey's establihed we get rid of caliphate and swaped caliphate with nationalism. Nationalism is Turkey's founding and Turkish people are very nationalist. This won't change any time soon.
 
@T-123456... pkk may not be hardcore socialist like the baath movement or libyan jamahiriya or communist party of russia... pkk may want something called "kurdistan", but pkk fits more comfortably among socialists than with "nationalists"... as long as turkey exists as a nation, without the communist dream of humanity without nations, it is fair enough for pkk to talk of "greater kurdistan"... if you forget natiionalism, they will too... as for me, i am an actual socialist activist... been that for eleven years... i follow the "jamahiriya" socialist ideology from the libyan jamahiriya... please go through my posts here by doing "member search".

@Oublious... if you are talking about me, then i am muslim, but im also modern socialist and believe in removing the old religions, including the early socialist ones... christianity and islam... and did you know that india had a turkic queen who ruled a turkic empire from dellhi?? she was razia sultan, daughter of iltumish, and ruled from 1236 to 1240... but you don't know that, yes?? you don't know much about south asia, or indeed, much of the world... you talk like a villager.
I myself am a villager you dont like villagers?
What is socialist about you then,arent socialists for equality for all?
His english may be not good enough but that doesnt mean that you can look down on him,you should respect people no matter what social status or origin he/she has.
 
For your knowledge, PKK shifted it's policy long ago. They don't strive for Kurdistan anymore. They want a Kurdish autonomous region in Turkey.

yes, i have read that... and that is their compromise... they have been fighting for years, and their situation became like that in kashmir... tennis ball getting shot by iraq, syria and turkey... their compromise of "kurdish autonomous region" seems similar to "tibet autonomous region".

Secondly, Kurdish population in Turkey are highly religious, they won't accept anything like socialism.

in the modern world, a socialist muslim is true muslim, because christianity and islam were early socialism... but if by "religious" you mean mosque and burqa, that is not what islam is about... mosque is not needed at all, and burqa is really anti-islam and it is a clothing that comes from iran.

muammar gaddafi, one of the greatest modern socialist leaders, was the imaam of all muslims.

but we must speak of a post-religion humanity.

Ottoman Empire's binding power was ummah. When Turkey's establihed we get rid of caliphate and swaped caliphate with nationalism. Nationalism is Turkey's founding and Turkish people are very nationalist. This won't change any time soon.

nationalism is obsolete... a communist humanity is humanity which has removed nationalism... please read this recent thread ( The Worldwide Government | Page 2 ).
 
@Oublious... if you are talking about me, then i am muslim, but im also modern socialist and believe in removing the old religions, including the early socialist ones... christianity and islam... and did you know that india had a turkic queen who ruled a turkic empire from dellhi?? she was razia sultan, daughter of iltumish, and ruled from 1236 to 1240... but you don't know that, yes?? you don't know much about south asia, or indeed, much of the world... you talk like a villager.


i dont talk about things what i dont know. You wont see me in topics about Asian isseus. But you are still going on like woman about subject you dont understandd.

If i am a villager you are a mountain dweller aqm. You came from the mountains like savage and know talking about things you dont know. Only thing you know is socialism.

Dağdan gelip bağdakini kovmak:-)
 
I myself am a villager you dont like villagers?
What is socialist about you then,arent socialists for equality for all?
His english may be not good enough but that doesnt mean that you can look down on him,you should respect people no matter what social status or origin he/she has.

you misunderstand... it wasn't his english i didn't like... it was his cruelty, crude way of talking and refusal to learn... by "villager", i meant the typical "racist" and anti-female attitudes that village life seems to create in people... believe me, here in india, i know people from every economic class... from security guards to former government officers to business owners... and i respect them based on their intelligence and sensibilities... hope you understand... :-)
 
you misunderstand... it wasn't his english i didn't like... it was his cruelty, crude way of talking and refusal to learn... by "villager", i meant the typical "racist" and anti-female attitudes that village life seems to create in people... believe me, here in india, i know people from every economic class... from security guards to former government officers to business owners... and i respect them based on their intelligence and sensibilities... hope you understand... :-)

Just curious, what is your sect? You don't have to reply if you don't want to answer that question.
 
Just curious, what is your sect? You don't have to reply if you don't want to answer that question.

i was born in sunni family... but like muammar gaddafi, i used to say... "i am not sunni, i am not shia, i am just muslim"... but of late, i have been propagating going beyond the old religions... :-)
 
i was born in sunni family... but like muammar gaddafi, i used to say... "i am not sunni, i am not shia, i am just muslim"... but of late, i have been propagating going beyond the old religions... :-)

You should check out my own idea about how to reinvent Islam:
How to stop Islamic extremism: Global Fiqh Council (GFC)

You cannot have a new -ism as a starting point, you have to start with what you already have, in my opinion.
 
You should check out my own idea about how to reinvent Islam:
How to stop Islamic extremism: Global Fiqh Council (GFC)

thanks for the link... i will read the six pages of it with care... i see some things in your first post there that i don't agree with but you have correctly identified khomenei as one of the main wrong people who have brought islam into disrepute.

You cannot have a new -ism as a starting point, you have to start with what you already have, in my opinion.

true... so it is easier for thinking christians and muslims ( and sikhs ) to re-read their books and see that a post-religion future should come automatically to them.

think of just one chain of links... hazrat isa ( jesus christ ) is awaited among in islami mythology for his second coming ( as mahdi )... and guru nanak ( founder of sikhism ) was inspired by islam.

but sincerely, what about the other humanity... the hindu, the bahai, the buddhist...

so a clean-slate presentation of scientific, socialist and post-religion future is the best... please do read the "worldwide government" thread... :-)
 
thanks for the link... i will read the six pages of it with care... i see some things in your first post there that i don't agree with but you have correctly identified khomenei as one of the main wrong people who have brought islam into disrepute.



true... so it is easier for thinking christians and muslims ( and sikhs ) to re-read their books and see that a post-religion future should come automatically to them.

think of just one chain of links... hazrat isa ( jesus christ ) is awaited among in islami mythology for his second coming ( as mahdi )... and guru nanak ( founder of sikhism ) was inspired by islam.

but sincerely, what about the other humanity... the hindu, the bahai, the buddhist...

so a clean-slate presentation of scientific, socialist and post-religion future is the best... please do read the "worldwide government" thread... :-)

A clean slate does not work, because of:
Path dependence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is why Marxism failed and so will any other new clean slate effort. What works is evolution and incrementalism, small evolutionary steps from existing state.

I already posted in the "worldwide govt." thread:
The Worldwide Government | Page 5
 
What works is evolution and incrementalism, small evolutionary steps from existing state.

which is why in the "worldwide" thread i posted this..,

"the "communist society for all humans" is the end vision of modern socialism... it is a human-wide society where governments have fallen, national militaries have been disbanded, oppressions through money, tradition or family have been abolished, and people rule themselves ( self-governance )... this has essentially been the vision from the old greek philosophers who spoke of democracy ( demokratia, demokratos )... down to christianity and islam... down to the french revolution... down to the russian revolution and after... down to the libyan jamahiriya... a continuous refinement and progression...

it is time to take humanity to the next step towards the "communist society".

The Worldwide Government | Page 3

so marxism, leninism, maoism, baathism, nasserism, jamahiriya... they all are incremental progressions... though jamahiriya is a radical jump.

I already posted in the "worldwide govt." thread:
The Worldwide Government | Page 5

i have seen that post... i wanted to write my surprise about you including russia in future partnership in the western bloc... that will only be true if russia has a regime-change and installation of pro-nato government... but if you read vostok's posts in that thread, that situation won't happen... i didn't write because i wanted to first respond to the topic and later, people said that we should let that thread rest for a while and allow people to re-read and think.

Path dependence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

that page says "history matters"... so we have a history of incremental socialism, if we really want to look at history... and that history also validates a jump to post-money post-religion, socialist, scientific humanity.

seen that way, we are being true to "path dependance" as well as making a radical change on a clean slate.
 
which is why in the "worldwide" thread i posted this..,

The Worldwide Government | Page 3

so marxism, leninism, maoism, baathism, nasserism, jamahiriya... they all are incremental progressions... though jamahiriya is a radical jump.

i have seen that post... i wanted to write my surprise about you including russia in future partnership in the western bloc... that will only be true if russia has a regime-change and installation of pro-nato government... but if you read vostok's posts in that thread, that situation won't happen... i didn't write because i wanted to first respond to the topic and later, people said that we should let that thread rest for a while and allow people to re-read and think.

that page says "history matters"... so we have a history of incremental socialism, if we really want to look at history... and that history also validates a jump to post-money post-religion, socialist, scientific humanity.

seen that way, we are being true to "path dependance" as well as making a radical change on a clean slate.

I am afraid you have lost me there. I presented my case, but you failed to see it. Muslim world is not ready for post religion, not yet, only a reformation which I mentioned in GFC thread. Socialism is all the rage in post-religious west (Democratic Socialism) a la Naomi Klein who argues that capitalism is pushing the world to Global Warming and other environmental disasters:
This Changes Everything by Naomi Klein, review: 'undoubtedly right' - Telegraph

But Muslim communities of the world are not at that stage yet.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom