Meet the indian Baloch

[American Pakistani]

Can't you read? I gave you the source. Now, for once, instead of depending on the remains of propaganda sites that wind you up, read your own authors. You might be a little more humble after doing that, although, frankly, I doubt it.

Why don't you tell us what happened? I don't find anywhere about Pakistan meddling in India's internal affairs in 1966.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Definitely curious - I can only think of Tashkent Declaration in 1966.

No substitute for doing your homework.

 

[Imran Khan]

they are daily wager balochs

 

[Joe Shearer]

Well I was very explicit. You might have got your puberty in 66 but nobody cares about it here.

The thing is that our support to freedom movement for Kashmir would continue since it is neither your internal matter nor Kashmir is India.

You might have been, but you have so much to say with so little to back it that it is a waste of time to follow your wriggles and twists. Every time you are exposed, you resort to vulgarity. That's all right; nobody thinks of you as anything but a loud and brassy voice.

Your support for Kashmir was not in discussion; you are, and were, off-topic. Your learned friend, American Pakistani, talked about 71; I pointed out that interference in others' internal affairs was your own special hallmark and quoted your actions in 66.

Since you don't have a clue what I am referring to, it is understandable that you are taking these evasive actions.

Pathetic.

Why don't you tell us what happened? I don't find anywhere about Pakistan meddling in India's internal affairs in 1966.

All right. Mizoram. And the evidence is in the book I quoted. Brigadier Khan found out by accident when he was in East Pakistan with 2 SSG.

I never bluff, or lie. You should know that by now, however much you hate my point of view.

 

[Jackdaws]

You might have been, but you have so much to say with so little to back it that it is a waste of time to follow your wriggles and twists. Every time you are exposed, you resort to vulgarity. That's all right; nobody thinks of you as anything but a loud and brassy voice.

Your support for Kashmir was not in discussion; you are, and were, off-topic. Your learned friend, American Pakistani, talked about 71; I pointed out that interference in others' internal affairs was your own special hallmark and quoted your actions in 66.

Since you don't have a clue what I am referring to, it is understandable that you are taking these evasive actions.

Pathetic.



All right. Mizoram. And the evidence is in the book I quoted. Brigadier Khan found out by accident when he was in East Pakistan with 2 SSG.

I never bluff, or lie. You should know that by now, however much you hate my point of view.

Darn. India conducted airstrikes against own population and Pak supplied weapons and training to Mizo rebels. That info is sheer gold.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Darn. India conducted airstrikes against own population and Pak supplied weapons and training to Mizo rebels. That info is sheer gold.

Whatever gave you the impression that I bluff or lie? Please read the book.

Apart from everything else, it is one of the best military memoirs I have read. How I wish I could have met the man.

 

[Jackdaws]

Whatever gave you the impression that I bluff or lie? Please read the book.

Apart from everything else, it is one of the best military memoirs I have read. How I wish I could have met the man.

No, I didn't doubt your expertise. Given how much I have read on South Asian history in American libraries and even on ancient microfilms and microfiche - I am stumped that I somehow missed this.

 

[American Pakistani]

You might have been, but you have so much to say with so little to back it that it is a waste of time to follow your wriggles and twists. Every time you are exposed, you resort to vulgarity. That's all right; nobody thinks of you as anything but a loud and brassy voice.

Your support for Kashmir was not in discussion; you are, and were, off-topic. Your learned friend, American Pakistani, talked about 71; I pointed out that interference in others' internal affairs was your own special hallmark and quoted your actions in 66.

Since you don't have a clue what I am referring to, it is understandable that you are taking these evasive actions.

Pathetic.



All right. Mizoram. And the evidence is in the book I quoted. Brigadier Khan found out by accident when he was in East Pakistan with 2 SSG.

I never bluff, or lie. You should know that by now, however much you hate my point of view.

Can we have a source please? Or you will keep posting opinions of some individuals?

 

[Joe Shearer]

Can we have a source please? Or you will keep posting opinions of some individuals?

Are you joking? It was in my first post to you.

 

[American Pakistani]

Whatever gave you the impression that I bluff or lie? Please read the book.

Apart from everything else, it is one of the best military memoirs I have read. How I wish I could have met the man.

Anyone who post cr@p against Pakistan becomes your hero. What's new in it?

 

[Sully3]

meanwhile in Balochistan

https://twitter.com/x/status/942737841435508736

 

[American Pakistani]

Are you joking? It was in my first post to you.

If Pakistan was involved in something related to india in 66, there must be some articles or something neutral. You posted some book name written by some individual. Can we have a neutral article that supports your claim?

 

[Jackdaws]

Can we have a source please? Or you will keep posting opinions of some individuals?

Apparently you not only gave them training and hardware. Even moved their HQ to Chittagong Hill Tracts in East Pakistan.

Here is some information -

https://books.google.co.in/books?id...ge&q=Mizo National Front AND Pakistan&f=false

 

[Joe Shearer]

If Pakistan was involved in something related to india in 66, there must be some articles or something neutral. You posted some book name written by some individual. Can we have a neutral article that supports your claim?

That 'some individual' was a Brigadier of the Pakistan Army, of a family of six brothers, all of whom were in the services. I didn't quote a neutral article, I quoted a Pakistani source. There are also American studies, with photographs, of the whole episode, but I should have thought that a source from your own side was trumps.

Just to remind you, the name of the book, reviewed, with excitement, by various defence publications in Pakistan. Looks like in this conversation, only one of us is interested in studying Pakistani military history.

 

[Sully3]

Anil and Kumar from Pune jobless pretending to be Baloch so RAW hands them out a few thousand rupees a month

https://twitter.com/x/status/932912700929257472

Never do us Pakistanis speak like this