Mass monk rallies against OIC in major Myanmar cities

[newdelhinsa]

OIC funds international terrorists and rants day and night at UN to legislate laws to protect Islamic bigotry. When muslims riots naked on streets OIC feels proud but when a nation rise against heavily funded Islamic terrorists they send more oil money to help them.

OIC has no moral standing to pontificate others for their actions when they are just a bunch of selfish hypocrite nations with one agenda to shelter muslims even if they are criminals.

 

[Skallagrim]

Is that the best you can do? a Yeti is not a monkey btw get some education fool

“Foreigners, like the Bengalis, have the right to apply for citizenship if they want to,” Khin Ye told RFA’s Burmese service, citing an amendment to the country’s constitution in 1982 during the rule of the former military regime.


“The requirements are that their grandparents and parents must have lived here and died here, that the applicant was born here and can speak the Burmese language, and that he or she wants to live here, among other things,” he said.

He maintained that the Rohingya, which he referred to as Bengalis from neighboring Bangladesh, were first brought to Burma as laborers during British occupation from 1824 until the nation gained its independence in 1948.

Everyone knows that. It's the absurdity/savagery of this law that we argue over.

 

[HaiderM]

OIC funds international terrorists and rants day and night at UN to legislate laws to protect Islamic bigotry.

i didnt see OIC legislating laws to prevent extremist hindus entering dubai or saudi arabia

 

[Yeti]

Everyone knows that. It's the absurdity/savagery of this law that we argue over.

So why is your Govt not taking them in? as the Burmese do not class them as their 'own' citizens although they have the right to apply to become one. Or perhaps the OIC should let them settle in arab countries.

 

[sarthak]

why we kick the indians out from the countless places you have immigrated, think before you speak

Who is "we" you dumbass. You speak like Arab countries are your father's property or something. Pakistanis over there are treated just like Indians , if not worse , especially because they are mostly employed in menial jobs - restaurant , groceries , labour or truck drivers. You really seem to have a wrong picture of Pakistanis in the middle east. You obviously think they live lavish lives in big bungalows like your role model , Dawood Ibrahim . Most of them live in harsh, almost ghetto conditions and just don't return because well , those harsh conditions are paradise compared to Pakistan. Also , btw , many EU countries and US have started restricting visas for Pakistanis , they obviously don't want any more 9/11's to take place. On the other hand , professionals from India and other countries are still being recruited. Come out of your arrogance , you are the ones being kicked out , not the ones kicking others out.

 

[newdelhinsa]

i didnt see OIC legislating laws to prevent extremist hindus entering dubai or saudi arabia

Talk about Pakistan terrorists living in Dubai and KSA. Just few months back their daddy USA forced them to deport one back to India having Pakistani passport.

 

[HaiderM]

So why is your Govt not taking them in? as the Burmese do not class them as their 'own' citizens although they have the right to apply to become one. Or perhaps the OIC should let them settle in arab countries.

the half of bengalis live in india, the west bengal is in india, why dont you take them, there was no bangladesh in 1880 or was it?

 

[Yeti]

the half of bengalis live in india, the west bengal is in india, why dont you take them, there was no bangladesh in 1880 or was it?

What are you saying? Bangladesh was part of Pakistan not India and they became their own country what does that have to do with India now?

 

[HaiderM]

What are you saying? Bangladesh was part of Pakistan not India and they became their own country what does that have to do with India now?

i said west bengal is in india why dont you take 'rohingya bengalis'

and what has rohingyas have to do with pakistan?? you talking about their bengali heritage didnt you?

 

[Luffy 500]

Now savage racists are rallying in mayanmar to justify massacre of rohingyas and Indians are cheerleading bollywood style. Mayanmar should be grateful to both united PAK and later BD that were dumb enough to not have annexed arakan, the rightful territory of muslims and ancient chittagong since hundreds of years.

 

[Yeti]

i said west bengal is in india why dont you take 'rohingya bengalis'

and what has rohingyas have to do with pakistan?? you talking about their bengali heritage didnt you?

Why do we want these people in our country? we already have enough illegal migrants in west bengal we are not concerned like the OIC about them so the emphasis should be on arab countries to take them in as they seem to be the ones being concerned with the Rohingya.

Also Bangladesh has refused to shelter them when they sought refuge so why should India take them in?

Now savage racists are rallying in mayanmar to justify massacre of rohingyas and Indians are cheerleading bollywood style. Mayanmar should be grateful to both united PAK and later BD that were dumb enough to not have annexed arakan, the rightful territory of muslims and ancient chittagong since hundreds of years.

Bangladesh would not even dare take on Burma they would make mince meat of you

 

[Skallagrim]

What are you saying? Bangladesh was part of Pakistan not India and they became their own country what does that have to do with India now?

Haider made a valid point. Considering the years in question (1824-1948), it was India)/united Bengal where they had come from.

 

[HaiderM]

Why do we want these people in our country? we already have enough illegal migrants in west bengal we are not concerned like the OIC about them so the emphasis should be on arab countries to take them in as they seem to be the ones being concerned with the Rohingya.

Also Bangladesh has refused to shelter them when they sought refuge so why should India take them in?

thats because rohingyas are burmese and they deserve their country while you are arguing that they are infact bengalis and should return to their land of the heritage how do you know if they belong to bangladesh or west bengal

OIC is concerned about their lives just like UN, doesnt mean they are not even burmese

 

[Yeti]

Haider made a valid point. Considering the years in question (1824-1948), it was India)/united Bengal where they had come from.

There was no country called India those times it was the British empire as we only became a country in 1947.

 

[Yeti]

thats because rohingyas are burmese and they deserve their country while you are arguing that they are infact bengalis and should return to their land of the heritage how do you know if they belong to bangladesh or west bengal

OIC is concerned about their lives just like UN, doesnt mean they are not even burmese

Who said they are Burmese? they do not have citizenship although they have the right to apply for one and when interviewed the people said they would like to settle in 'Muslim Bangladesh' but that is not a option for them so OIC with the money they have should give them sanctuary.