What's new

Maoist Rebels Kill 11 In Attacks In Eastern India

You mean the famine that occured in 1958? Like you said, it's an authoritarian regime.

Now what is India's excuse for starving more people to death than the rest of the world combined, even in today's world?

BBC NEWS | South Asia | 'Hunger critical' in South Asia

Come back to me when that figure reaches anywhere near to what occurred in China as a result of Mao.

Maybe if we get the Maoists in power they will kill off poor people in India, and we can then boast of having lesser poverty like China.
 
Come back to me when that figure reaches anywhere near to what occurred in China as a result of Mao.

Maybe if we get the Maoists in power they will kill off poor people in India, and we can then boast of having lesser poverty like China.

Ask and you shall receive... *****.


Indian maoists may never manage to achieve the incredible feat of Mao, he managed to kill about as many people in China s were killed in all of world war 2 , single handedly.

I am glad people can term it as freedom from oppression...:lol:

Even the great leap forward can't hold a candle to what you folks do. India killed every 8 years since independence, the equivalent a "great leap forward" the worst famine cause by communism.

Quote Amartya Sen.

"India seems to manage to fill its cupboard with more skeletons every eight years than China put there in its years of shame," (Dreze and Sen).

Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya, Hunger and Public Action. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1989.
 
Even the great leap forward can't hold a candle to what you folks do. India killed every 8 years since independence, the equivalent a "great leap forward" the worst famine cause by communism.

Quote Amartya Sen.



Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya, Hunger and Public Action. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1989.

And you believe there were no more poverty related deaths after 1961 in China?

There are no more poor people in China as well right?
 
Come back to me when that figure reaches anywhere near to what occurred in China as a result of Mao.

Maybe if we get the Maoists in power they will kill off poor people in India, and we can then boast of having lesser poverty like China.

LOL, read the quote from your own leading Economist.

India surpasses the death toll of that one incident in 1958, every eight years, repeatedly and consistently. And continues to do so even today.

In fact according to Unicef, India kills more people by starvation than the rest of the world combined.
 
LOL, read the quote from your own leading Economist.

India surpasses the death toll of that one incident in 1958, every eight years, repeatedly and consistently. And continues to do so even today.

The discussion was about the great leader Mao, in case you two *****es missed that and jumped to copy pasting links in true bot-style.
 
Hey CD..How long are you going to peddle this 5 year old news?

What, you guys can peddle incidents in China from 1958, yet I can't post a recent Unicef report? LOL. :lol:

As your own leading Economist Amyarta Sen said, India starves more people to death every eight years since independence than the total deaths from the worst famine in our history.

And India continues to do that in the modern world as well. Bandit gave us the excuse of being an authoritarian regime for what happened in 1958, what is India's excuse for what they are doing today?
 
The discussion was about the great leader Mao, in case you two *****es missed that and jumped to copy pasting links in true bot-style.

More like pointing your own inability to accept that India's killed more of its own people than any communism regime ever did. And that autobotting is called referencing your claims, something a mortgage peddling clerk wouldn't need to understand.
 
What, you guys can peddle incidents in China from 1958, yet I can't post a recent Unicef report? LOL. :lol:

Of course you can, but 5 years is a little old for news reports pertaining to statistics ....don't you think. Kindly post from some new links perhaps from the last 6 months or are you just too much in love with this report.

As your own leading Economist Amyarta Sen said, India starves more people to death every eight years since independence than the total deaths from the worst famine in our history.

Amarthya Sen, Arundathi Roy, JNU jholawallahs etc are all birds of same feather...eternal pessimists.....the more poor there are in India, the happier they are.
 
the newest available stats

India’s most striking feature is its diversity. The country’s population of about 1.2 billion people is composed of several ethnic groups, speaking more than 1,000 languages and following six major religions. With an annual population growth rate of 1.4 per cent, India is projected to become the most populous country in the world by 2035.

With 33 per cent of the world’s poor people, 41.6 per cent of India’s population lives on less than US$1.25 a day. Based on the country’s new official poverty lines, 42 per cent of people in rural areas and 26 per cent of people in urban areas lived below the poverty line in 2004/05. Official poverty estimates for 2009/10 are not yet available, but preliminary estimates suggest that the combined all-India poverty rate was 32 per cent, compared with 37 per cent in 2004/05.

India ranks 134 out of 187 countries on the United Nations Development Programme’s 2011 Human Development Index – a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education and standards of living for countries worldwide.

A total of 72 per cent of India’s population lives in rural areas, and 10 per cent of rural households are reported to be landless. Agricultural wage earners, smallholder farmers and casual workers in the non-farm sector constitute the bulk of poor rural people. Within these categories, women and tribal communities are the most deprived. About 300 million young people ages 13 to 35 live in rural areas, and most of them are forced to migrate seasonally or permanently, without the skills and competencies required by the modern economy that India is rapidly becoming.

Poverty is deepest among members of scheduled castes and tribes in the country's rural areas. On the map of poverty in India, the poorest areas are in parts of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Orissa, Chattisgarh and West Bengal.

Large numbers of India's poorest people live in the country's semi-arid tropical region. In this area, shortages of water and recurrent droughts impede the transformation of agriculture that the Green Revolution achieved elsewhere. There is also a high incidence of poverty in flood-prone areas, such as those extending from eastern Uttar Pradesh to the Assam plains, and especially in northern Bihar. Poverty affects tribal people in forest areas, where loss of entitlement to resources has made them even poorer. In coastal fishing communities, people’s living conditions are deteriorating because of environmental degradation, stock depletion and vulnerability to natural disasters.

Despite recent economic growth, poverty levels have not been reduced at the same pace. Poor rural people continue to live with inadequate physical and social infrastructure, poor access to services, and a highly stratified and hierarchical social structure, characterized by inequalities in assets, status and power.
 
More like pointing your own inability to accept that India's killed more of its own people than any communism regime ever did. And that autobotting is called referencing your claims, something a mortgage peddling clerk wouldn't need to understand.

Autobotting is the fact that missing the understanding of what is being discussed bots jump in with a set of preset links.

And as I read somewhere, personal attacks are the last resort of the incompetent, not in least due to the fact that communist regime stifles creativity.

After all,botting is good economic sense, making one post per day probably takes most above the Chinese poverty line :lol:
 
Yeah fck people who care about the poor, they are making India look bad, they should shut up.

Shining INDIA!!*()!@#()! JAI HIND!@(!@#(!



These people don't care about the poor, they just pretend they are. These people are those I would like to call 'Five Star Social Activists', bcs they they would like to give sermons from air conditioned halls of 5 star hotels.
 
These people don't care about the poor, they just pretend they are. These people are those I would like to call 'Five Star Social Activists', bcs they they would like to give sermons from air conditioned halls of 5 star hotels.

As oppose to the Dalai Lama who absolutely refuses to accept large amounts of cash for speaking engagements or stay at luxury hotels.
 
Back
Top Bottom