What's new

Maoist leader of Nepal Dr. Baburam Bhattarai criticized for his India trip

Viva

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Country
Nepal
Location
Nepal
Baburam Bhattarai's visit to India has been largely criticized by Nepalese. It's the current trending topic in Nepalese twittosphere. While some defend him , majority have been largely offended and disappointed by his move.
Former PM BRB, who is very active in twitter and facebook was heavily panned by his followers in his posts for his hypo-critic behavior. BRB went to New Delhi just after conducting mass rally in Kathmandu to pressurize opposition to draft constitution by consensus. Many sees this as a political lobbying. New Delhi is mecca for our Nepalis politicians after they fail as New Delhi has managed to keep high its influence in Nepali politics. And Dr. Bhattarai is definitely not the first one to do this.

So, why was Dr. Bhattarai called as hypocrite by Nepalese people including some from his own alliance?
Dr. Bhattarai and his comrades of Maoist submitted 40 demands memorandum related to "nationalism, democracy and livelihood" to then PM Sher Bhadaur Deuba. These included abolition of royal privileges, the promulgation of a new constitution by election , and the abrogation of the Mahakali treaty with India which regulated the distribution of water and electricity as well as the delineation of the border between the two countries, banning of Indian vehicles, movies, products in Nepal. Half of the demands were about India's expansionism in Nepal citing as threat to nationality. Sher bahadur Deuba failed to address these demands as most of it were unnecessary and absurd. This is what catalyzed the People's war as Maoist call it that claimed 13,000 lives.
So, after all this Dr.Bhattarai now is in New Delhi asking for political favour and criticizing about its opposition especially UML[biggest commies in Nepal]. If this is not hypocrisy than what is?
Imagine Bin Laden if alive asking for favours with Americans to help him through his political carreer as Taliban leader in Afghanistan. Imagine him giving an open invitation to American government to come and interfere in their internal matter.

Here are few tweets :
"Our comrades , who supposedly fought against "Indian expansionism" in Nepal now openly seeks India's meddling. Great Transformation."
"Washing Nepali politics' dirty linen in Yamuna Ghaat and wallowing in self pity can never yield anything , Comrade. Too sad"
 
.
@Viva

isn't brb leader of a faction opposed to prachanda??

This is what catalyzed the People's war as Maoist call it that claimed 13,000 lives.

it was a war with two sides... with one side militarily supplied by india.
 
.
@Viva

isn't brb leader of a faction opposed to prachanda??



it was a war with two sides... with one side militarily supplied by india.

No, that's Baidya. Baidya still wants to go onto war.
I'm sure most Indians think that it's baseless accusation ,I'm surprised that you also have same thought that most of us Nepalese do.
 
.
No, that's Baidya. Baidya still wants to go onto war.

thanks for that info.

I'm sure most Indians think that it's baseless accusation ,I'm surprised that you also have same thought that most of us Nepalese do.

if you mean about india helping "royal nepal army", well, i am a commie so i have a more clear picture than most others from india. :D
 
.
if you mean about india helping "royal nepal army", well, i am a commie so i have a more clear picture than most others from india. :D[/QUOTE]

No I meant about supplying arms to Maoist.
Thank god u do because I don't like having unnecessary argument about India helping or not helping maoist.
People don't understand that we are not questioning an individualistic role but rather the decision of the authority.
 
.
No I meant about supplying arms to Maoist.

:what:

when did that happen??

indian army supplied to the "royal nepal army", especially the insas assault rifles ( which failed on the field ).

indian army has been massacring the maoists within india... there are 100,000+ indian government soldiers ( crpf paramilitary, police, salwa judum militia, airforce ) try to kill maybe 6000 maoists.
 
.
:what:

when did that happen??

indian army supplied to the "royal nepal army", especially the insas assault rifles ( which failed on the field ).

indian army has been massacring the maoists within india... there are 100,000+ indian government soldiers ( crpf paramilitary, police, salwa judum militia, airforce ) try to kill maybe 6000 maoists.

My god,i knew you were a commie but a traitor
 
.
My god,i knew you were a commie but a traitor

sanghis are the traitors... they want to massacre citizens of india called naxalites whose only aim is to bring a just system to india.

you should go declare your fellowship of the sangh to amaanat's father and tell him why his daughter's torturer, mukesh, is so very right, and why the naxalites are wrong.

the leaders of sangh parivaar must be brought to trial in the "international criminal court"... the sangh is a traitor to humanity.
 
.
sanghis are the traitors... they want to massacre citizens of india called naxalites whose only aim is to bring a just system to india.

you should go declare your fellowship of the sangh to amaanat's father and tell him why his daughter's torturer, mukesh, is so very right, and why the naxalites are wrong.

the leaders of sangh parivaar must be brought to trial in the "international criminal court"... the sangh is a traitor to humanity.

So you support those Scum Maoists
Those suckers lost their rights when they picked up arms against the state
You & your Kind will be hunted down very soon don't worry
 
. .
if maoists are scum then what kind is not scum??



did you ask them why??



not very democratic of you.

1st Maoisits are scums becuz they use Arms to achieve their goals
2nd Doesn't matter they could try other means like winning the Elections in their areas (If they truly had the support of people that wouldn't have been to difficult)
3rd Your kind lost your democratic rights long ago man
 
.
1st Maoisits are scums becuz they use Arms to achieve their goals

true... arms are not the only means to achieve power... the means can be technological or business... and some societies like libya and venezuela had bloodless revolutions.

2nd Doesn't matter they could try other means like winning the Elections in their areas (If they truly had the support of people that wouldn't have been to difficult)

multi-party election system is a waste of time... 67 years of elections passed since 1947 and just a few months ago, 69 people died of hunger in the tea estates of darjeeling and parents still commit "honor killing" and india was declared last year to be "suicide capital of the world"... how can someone like me not cry about these oppressions and not cry out for alternative ( which is found only in socialism ).
 
.
true... arms are not the only means to achieve power... the means can be technological or business... and some societies like libya and venezuela had bloodless revolutions.



multi-party election system is a waste of time... 67 years of elections passed since 1947 and just a few months ago, 69 people died of hunger in the tea estates of darjeeling and parents still commit "honor killing" and india was declared last year to be "suicide capital of the world"... how can someone like me not cry about these oppressions and not cry out for alternative ( which is found only in socialism ).

So what other systems so propose we should have
other than our Democratic Multi Party system process
 
.
So what other systems so propose we should have
other than our Democratic Multi Party system process

no-party direct-democracy like libya had... i describe it here ( proposal for a new division of south asia | Page 10 )... when the system takes care of the consent and suggestion of every citizen directly and every citizen compulsarily participates in the running of his or her society politcially, there is no need to have even single-party rule ( eg. ussr, east germany, north korea )... the people are the government.
 
.
no-party direct-democracy like libya had... i describe it here ( proposal for a new division of south asia | Page 10 )... when the system takes care of the consent and suggestion of every citizen directly and every citizen compulsarily participates in the running of his or her society politcially, there is no need to have even single-party rule ( eg. ussr, east germany, north korea )... the people are the government.


To much Utopian
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom