What's new

Man Breaks Into Mosque, Rips Up Copies Of Quran

You proved my point.

A '9/11' cannot be done while the brain's chemistry is affected. If an event is planned months in advanced, that event is off the mind, therefore, in the context of terrorism, the man is a terrorist.


Please...:rolleyes:

You ain't as wise as you think you are.

As I said a terrorists is always a terrorist, sober or not and Hitler and Trump are best examples of that. You may think that you can twist every fact but the truth is nowhere near, so give it a rest, would you?
 
.
As I said a terrorists is always a terrorist, sober or not and Hitler and Trump are best examples of that. You may think that you can twist every fact but the truth is nowhere near, so give it a rest, would you?
There is no 'twisting' of facts here, only putting things into proper context.

If a child was terrorized at and because of a carnival ride, are you going to call the carnival a 'terrorist' organization ?
 
.
There is no 'twisting' of facts here, only putting things into proper context.

If a child was terrorized at and because of a carnival ride, are you going to call the carnival a 'terrorist' organization ?

funny how worked up you are about his comment, but failed to condemn the vandalism. How typical of your kind!
 
.
There is no 'twisting' of facts here, only putting things into proper context.

If a child was terrorized at and because of a carnival ride, are you going to call the carnival a 'terrorist' organization ?

Again you are twisting the fact! A child is never terrorized by a carnival ride, he may be frightened of it. Learn English would you? In this context 'terrorized' has a different connotation.
 
.
Again you are twisting the fact! A child is never terrorized by a carnival ride, he may be frightened of it. Learn English would you? In this context 'terrorized' has a different connotation.
Aaahhh...So now you admit there are different contexts of the word 'terrorism' and related words.

Was Timothy McVeigh a terrorist ? Absolutely. And so was the Unabomber.

In the current context, a 'terrorist' is someone who is of sound mind, whose brain was not affected by any substances, and who know to the fullest extent the consequences of his actions. But even if he drinks alcohol or dabbles in recreational hallucinogenics, in the end, if he was convinced of the righteousness of his actions and act upon that righteousness, which implies methodical thought processes, then he cannot be excused from his actions.

In this event, was this unknown man a politically motivated person which put him as a 'suspected' terrorist ? Possibly. And this is where ordinary police work must be allowed to work. If they capture this man and found he was a habitual illegal drugs user, he may not earn the label 'terrorist' in the current political context.
 
.
He isn't a terrorist...there is a huge gap between a bigot and a terrorist!

But I like that a guy goes into a mosque and destroys 100+ Qurans and the authorities say....

'there is no indication this was a hate crime'

:lol:

I wonder if 'Ahmed' did the same to in a church or synagogue would get the same 'consideration'.
 
.
Aaahhh...So now you admit there are different contexts of the word 'terrorism' and related words.

Was Timothy McVeigh a terrorist ? Absolutely. And so was the Unabomber.

In the current context, a 'terrorist' is someone who is of sound mind, whose brain was not affected by any substances, and who know to the fullest extent the consequences of his actions. But even if he drinks alcohol or dabbles in recreational hallucinogenics, in the end, if he was convinced of the righteousness of his actions and act upon that righteousness, which implies methodical thought processes, then he cannot be excused from his actions.

In this event, was this unknown man a politically motivated person which put him as a 'suspected' terrorist ? Possibly. And this is where ordinary police work must be allowed to work. If they capture this man and found he was a habitual illegal drugs user, he may not earn the label 'terrorist' in the current political context.

Is there any rule that a habitual drug user cannot subscribe to your KKK fancies and act on it?
 
.
Wrong to use the word terrorists, he didnt kill no one, unlike terrorists in Asia.

When/If he does kill brown people, then call him that
By definition terrorist is a person who terrorize people. Breaking in some place terrorize the stakeholder. It is not must that terror is spread through massacre or arson. Even speech can terrorize people.
 
.
Wrong to use the word terrorists, he didnt kill no one, unlike terrorists in Asia.

When/If he does kill brown people, then call him that

Terrorism word is from terrorizing someone. not only "killing". Even "Tulsi" can terrorize these American's but this act can't ? why the hypocrisy ?
 
.
the guys should be picked up and sent to counciling along the traumatised muslims here because of this incident.
 
.
Wrong to use the word terrorists, he didnt kill no one, unlike terrorists in Asia.

When/If he does kill brown people, then call him that
Once a hindu always a hindu. Dont show your blind hatred towards muslims. You--hindus kill muslims in suspicion of eating beef. I will call those murderers as terrorists for killing innocents but again this time, you will change your definition of terrorist--hypocrite @the next level. Im going to slaughter your cow mata next eid, do whatever you can do.
 
.
someone should ask this guy, what did you achieve by doing this ACT ? Quran is memorized by Millions of people around , even if you manage to rip every Single Quran in this world or remove it from Internet, you can't take it out from People's memory .. Ripping a book shows that people in USA are scared, why not get one book for yourself ,read and learn something ... than come out to confront those who use Quran and Islam as excuse to hurt others ? I thought American's were smart ..
 
.
By definition terrorist is a person who terrorize people. Breaking in some place terrorize the stakeholder. It is not must that terror is spread through massacre or arson. Even speech can terrorize people.

He broke into a mosque to desecrate the Quran. He was recorded on video and will be brought to justice, undoubtedly. His motive will also be known by the investigation.
 
. .
Wrong to use the word terrorists, he didnt kill no one, unlike terrorists in Asia.

When/If he does kill brown people, then call him that

A terrorist by definition is:

"a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."

Is going into your place of worship and ripping up your holy book not violence or intimidation? He may not have killed someone but he is still inciting terror which makes him a terrorist.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom