Malaysian Malays and their "Chinese pig" song

[shuntmaster]

Discrimination against Chinese in Malaysia for university places
Is Malaysia university entry a level playing field?
By Jennifer Pak BBC News, Kuala Lumpur

Mr Soh and Ms Hanie both applied to government-funded medical universities
Soh Boon Khang scored a perfect mark of 4.0 in his high-school exams.

He was confident that this grade would allow him to become the first doctor in his Chinese family. Mr Soh wanted to become a surgeon, specialising in oncology.

He applied to medical school but did not get a single offer from a government-funded university.

"I feel very frustrated and very sad. I cried three times because I used to believe that a diligent student who excelled at academics stood to get a chance," he said.

Hanie Farhana, meanwhile, who achieved a cumulative grade point average of 3.75 out of 4, was recently accepted into medical school.

She comes from the country's Malay majority, also known as Bumiputera. Some of her non-Bumiputera friends who scored higher marks did not get into government-funded universities, she said.

Ms Hanie felt she was given advantages over other races, such as access to certain scholarships not available to non-Bumiputeras.

"It is stated in the social contract back to independence [from the British] that Malays get special privileges and rights, whereas the non-Malays have their citizenship," she said, but added that she still worked hard and deserved her place.

'Something broken'
"The system should nurture talent - instead, we are creating generations of people who think that this country is unfair”

Chong Sin WoonMalaysian Chinese Association
Malaysia is made up of 60% Bumiputeras, 23% ethnic Chinese and 7% ethnic Indians, with the remainder made up of other races.

Since Bumiputeras traditionally lag behind in education and business, under national policies, they get cheaper housing, priority in government jobs and business licenses.

Malaysia also used to set ethnic quotas in government-funded universities to ensure that more Bumiputeras had access to higher education, but that system was abolished in 2002. Since then, Malaysia's education ministry has said the system is based on merit.

Ethnic minorities dispute this. The academic year begins this month, and of the 41,573 places in government-funded universities available, 19% were awarded to ethnic Chinese and 4% to ethnic Indians. The rest of the seats were mainly allocated to Bumiputeras.

Senator Jaspal Singh, with the Malaysian Indian Congress, which is part of the governing Barisan Nasional coalition, described it as the most unfair and biased university intake for ethnic minorities in decades.

Mr Jaspal said records showed that the number of Indians who applied to government-funded universities had remained steady, but those who were offered a place had dropped by more than half compared to a decade ago under the racial quota system, where at least 8% of the public university intake were Indian.

Ethnic Chinese representatives report that their student intake went down by a third in the same period.

"This year's intake resulted in many students with [perfect scores] of 4.0 cumulative grade point averages not getting courses of their choice, or worse, not being given places at all," said Mr Jaspal. Something was broken in the system, he said.

Deputy Education Minister P Kamalanathan was unable to confirm or deny whether the number of Chinese and Indian students accepted into public university had gone down since 2002. But he told the BBC that this year's figures alone showed that the system was based on merit.

"The success rate of the Chinese community in university is the highest in this country," he said.

Mr Kamalanathan said of all Malaysians who applied to universities in the 2013-14 academic year, 76% of ethnic Chinese were successful compared to 72% of Bumiputeras. The success rate for ethnic Indians was 69%.

Malaysia has 60% Bumiputeras, 23% ethnic Chinese and 7% ethnic Indians

Some students were left out, he argued, because there was big competition for a limited number of places on courses traditionally favoured by ethnic Chinese and Indians. Government data showed that there were 10 applicants for each of the 119 spots in the dentistry programme this year.

Some students with perfect scores refused to be placed in programmes other than the ones they opted for, he added.

The system is also not all based on academics, he said. Under the merit system, a student's academic marks account for 90% of the evaluation while 10% is based extra co-curricular marks. A student could also be rejected if they did not do well in a face-to-face interview with the university administrators.

"The entire university intake issue in Malaysia has nothing to do with race," he said.

It is a statement that is not easy for Mr Kamalanathan to say, since he is also part of the MIC party that Mr Jaspal belongs to - which is now pushing for more transparency.

He said that the problem was perception, and admitted that the ministry had not been forthcoming in the past with figures of the racial breakdown in universities.

'Unfair platform'
But others argue that university entrance is an unfair playing field and racially segregated.

Two of the most popular pre-university courses are matriculation and STPM. The former is in practice mainly reserved for Bumiputeras and can be completed in under one year.

Most ethnic Chinese and Indians are therefore limited to STPM, which takes almost two years and is seen as more academically challenging because it is tied to the University of Cambridge local examination syndicate and equivalent to British A-levels.

The education ministry says the two programmes are comparable.

Prime Minister Najib did not offer specific solutions for affected students

But Chong Sin Woon with the Malaysian Chinese Association said there are big discrepancies in the marking system in pre-university courses that has led to a widespread belief that the Chinese and Indians have to work much harder to compete with the Bumiputeras for the same university places.

"So it's already an unfair platform even before you apply for university," said Mr Chong.

As the party's youth education bureau chief, Mr Chong used to receive a couple of complaints from students who achieved perfect marks but were not offered anything.

This year, the MCA said it received a record 19 cases, which is alarming for Mr Chong.

Earlier this year Prime Minister Najib Razak blamed his Malay-dominated coalition's weaker performance in the May general election on a "Chinese tsunami" - Chinese voters deserted him to back the opposition.

The lower number of Chinese in government-funded universities is perceived by some as a backlash against the community, said Mr Chong.

His MCA party, traditionally the voice of the Chinese community within the governing coalition, lost half its seats in parliament. For the first time since Malaysia's independence from the British, the MCA has no members in the cabinet.

Mr Najib has said he will help the affected students, but did not address the underlying feeling of discontent among the ethnic Chinese and Indians.

Mr Chong said the country needs to streamline pre-university exams for all races to create true meritocracy.

Otherwise they will leave, and they do, says Mr Chong. According to the World Bank, the ethnic Chinese make up the majority of the brain drain from Malaysia.

"The system should nurture talent," he said. "Instead, we are creating generations of people who think that this country is unfair."

Meanwhile, Mr Soh's appeal against his university rejection is still pending with the government, but he has already decided to register in a private institution.

He said he is disappointed with the government-funded universities, saying the whole experience had made him question his love for the country.

"If I have offers from overseas for a job after graduation then I think I will leave the Malaysia because the country doesn't appreciate me," he said.

Affirmative action or racial discrimination?

May 9, 2014

Any official form that asks for information relating to the individual’s ethnicity (not ‘race’) requires a convincing justification.
By Kua Kia Soong

The insistence on declaring one’s ‘race’ in official forms has been justified by the Prime Minister on the basis that ‘race’ is still necessary for policy decisions.

How consistent has the BN government been meeting this objective?

Those of us who have been following official statistics in this country will know that statistics on race have been methodically perverted by the powers-that-be.

For a start, the New Economic Policy (NEP) was formulated in 1971 with a view to “eradicate economic function with race”. Thus, the earlier Malaysia Plans would provide statistics with ethnic breakdown.

Suddenly, in the late Eighties or so, such statistics considered vital for social and economic restructuring, were deemed by the government to be “likely to promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between the different communities”.

Subsequently, the later Malaysia Plans did not provide statistics with ethnic breakdown anymore.

This was the reason I received to a question in parliament for figures on student enrollment into institutes of higher learning according to ethnicity, on April 30, 1993. (See Kua Kia Soong, “Reforming Malaysia”, Oriengroup 1993:65)

Another question I asked on May 6, 1992, regarding why the hardcore non-bumiputera poor were not entitled to the RM500 million government assistance that was being given out, was again disqualified under Parliamentary Standing Orders 23(2) even though the NEP had declared that poverty eradication is irrespective of race.

On Aug 21, 1991, I wanted to know what proportion of scholarships, loans for certificate, diploma and degree given to bumiputeras had been given to children from poor households.

This was similarly rejected under S.O. 23(2) because apparently it was likely to “promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different communities in the Federation or infringe a provision of the Constitution or Sedition Act.”

Another question asking for the numbers and proportion of Malay, Chinese, Indian waged labour and their respective earnings on May 4, 1992 was again rejected based on the same stipulation of the Standing Orders of Parliament.

Even a question on the breakdown of the indigenous minorities according to their different ethnic groupings was likewise disqualified under Standing Orders 23(2)!

Thus, while on the one hand, Umno insists that ‘race’ is still necessary in official forms, ethnic (not “racial”) breakdown of official statistics is no longer seen to be obligatory since they no longer bother to justify racial quotas anymore.

During the early Eighties, the quota system for entry into the universities and access to scholarships and loans had to be justified.

Now this discrimination is practiced so blatantly that a former minister could even declare at an Umno general assembly that he would never allow a single non-bumiputera to enter UiTM.

By the early Eighties, the enrollment in residential schools and colleges, MARA science colleges already showed more than 95% bumiputera, some even showed 100% bumiputera; scholarships and loans for first degree in overseas institutions showed more than 90% bumiputera, even 100% bumiputera for some years.

The domination of the civil and armed services (above 90 per cent) by bumiputeras is today an undeniable fact.

Statistics on ownership of wealth elusive?

The perversion of statistics on ownership of capital according to ethnicity in Malaysia was highlighted when Dr Lim Teck Ghee resigned as the research director of Asli’s Centre for Public Policy Studies over the report which concluded that bumiputera corporate equity ownership was much higher than what government statistics showed.

Dr Lim said he stood by the report which stated that bumiputera corporate equity ownership could be as high as 45% and not 18.9% as stated in government statistics.

His resignation followed after Mirzan Mahathir, the president of Asli or the Asian Strategy and Leadership Institute, issued a statement that the report – Corporate Equity Distribution: Past Trends and Future Policy – was flawed in its methodology and assumptions, and its conclusions could not be “vigorously justified”.

Lim, a former United Nations regional adviser and World Bank senior political scientist, and the recipient of many international academic awards said:

“It is the fundamental right of the Malaysian public to question all government statistics and policies, more so when these are not transparent or defensible.”

The centre’s report had concluded that the National Economic Policy (NEP) target of 30% bumiputera equity ownership had already been exceeded, and said the official methodology inherited from the 1970s to measure corporate equity distribution was “narrowly-based” and “unrealistic”.

According to the 9MP, bumiputera equity ownership in 2004, as measured by the Economic Planning Unit (EPU), stood at 18.9%.

The then Umno vice-president Muhyiddin Yassin described the report as “rubbish” while then Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said that the report was “baseless”, “inaccurate” and “irresponsible”.

On Oct 9, 2006, Utusan Malaysia also quoted former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad as saying the centre’s findings were “illogical” because bumiputera economic control was far below that of other races.

Information relating to ethnicity may be necessary for health reasons since certain ethnic groups show tendencies that may be different from other groups, or the information may be necessary for equal employment opportunities or for related workforce studies.

Thus, any official form that asks for information relating to the individual’s ethnicity (not ‘race’) requires a convincing justification.

It should not be used for blatant racial discrimination disguised as affirmative action.

 

[Lux de Veritas]

The problem is not Malaysian Malay but radical Islam.

Many people tried to white wash Islam of responsibility but how far Malay and Chinese can go without Islam? Looking at the harmonious with Dayak, a Malay tribe, one can conclude that radical Islam makes people intolerant.

Almost all Islamic countries impose dhimmitude on others. Dhimmitude is insult, humiliation and extortion.

By the way is there such thing as "moderate" Islam?

 

[shuntmaster]

Extremism in the name of Islam and Malaysian Muslims
BY JOSHUA WOO



The Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project recent report on Muslims values towards extremism which was based on its face-to-face interviews conducted in 11 countries makes for interesting analysis. 822 Malaysians participated in the survey. 522 of them identified themselves as Muslim. When asked whether violence such as suicide bombing is justified to defend Islam from its enemies, 5% of the Malaysian Muslims surveyed said it is ‘often justified’, 22% said ‘sometimes justified’, 12% said it is ‘rarely justified’, 58% said it is ‘never justified’, while 3% indicated that they did not know or refuse to answer.

In 2010 Malaysia had 28.3 million citizens of which 61.3% identified themselves as Muslim. This is 17,347,900 people. If the Pew Research Center’s sample was representative of Malaysian Muslims, then the survey results would be the general view of Malaysian Muslims. If we then extrapolate the survey results, the following propositions could be made:

• 867,395 Malaysian Muslims think that violence such as suicide bombing is ‘often justified’ to defend Islam from its enemies.
• 3,816,538 Malaysian Muslims think that violence such as suicide bombing is ‘sometimes justified’ to defend Islam from its enemies.
• 2,081,748 Malaysian Muslims think that violence such as suicide bombing is ‘rarely justified’ to defend Islam from its enemies.
• 10,061,782 Malaysian Muslims think that violence such as suicide bombing is ‘never justified’ to defend Islam from its enemies.
• 520,437 Malaysian Muslims do not know or refuse to answer the question.

There are at least 3 important observations to be made from the above propositions.

First, about 6.7 million Malaysian Muslims, which is 39% of total Malaysian Muslims think that violence can be justified to defend Islam. If among the 520,437 who refused to answer the question because they were either afraid or embarrassed to reveal their inclination for the justification of violence to defend Islam, then the actual number would be higher. This suggests that close to half of Malaysian Muslims think that violence such as suicide bombing can be justified to defend Islam from its enemies. An important caveat, this does not mean that those who think so would actually participate in violent acts or sign-up for suicide bombing mission. As highlighted by sociologist Charles Kurzman,

“Sympathy for Islamist terrorism rarely translates into Islamist terrorist activities… This sort of symbolic endorsement does not translate into support for revolutionary goals or potential collaboration with terrorism.

Kurzman likened this to the popular cultural icon of Che Guevara, “For decades, left-leaning American and European youths have taped Che posters to their dorm-room walls without lifting a finger to overthrow capitalism.” Likewise, Muslims’ inclination towards the justification of violence in defence of Islam does not necessarily lead them into extremist activity.

Second, this observation redirects our attention to the United Malays National Organisation’s (UMNO) relation with Islamic extremism since the 9/11 terrorist attack in America. Lest we forget, the planning of the 9/11 attack took place in what is now known as the ‘Kuala Lumpur al-Qaeda Summit’. In his study on Malaysia’s connection to international terrorism, Joseph Liow noted that ever since the 1990s, “There were already indicators that Malaysia was proving to be a reliable transit point, if not an actual haven, for international Islamic militants long before the September 11 attacks.” In a recent press statement, Datuk Mohamad Fuzi Harun, the director of Malaysian police’s counter-terrorism special task force, revealed that Malaysia “was used as transit to a third country, fund-raising as well as recruitment of new suicide bombers.” There were no less than 10 international terrorist groups operating in Malaysia since the 9/11 attack.

Malaysia being a fertile ground for Islamic extremism is partly caused by the Islamisation agenda of UMNO. As Liow has commented,

To be sure, the Malaysian government’s operational actions against Islamic “extremists” and “radicals” are but one dimension of a complex relationship between religion, the state, and Malaysian society today. At the same time that the government is identifying and clamping down on extremists and radicals… the regime has encouraged, facilitated, and enhanced the role of the Islamic religious establishment in Malaysian society, the judiciary, and public life in general… [T]he regime has permitted—indeed, facilitated—a remarkable degree of penetration by the conservative Muslim clergy of the institutions of the state.[v]

Gordon Means similarly observed,

For jihadi militants, Malaysia was a land of opportunity but not where militants could enjoy tacit government sponsorship or a safe sanctuary. What Malaysia had to offer the Al Qaeda network was its climate of politicised Islam within a Muslim-majority population, its visa-free immigration to citizens of Islamic countries, its excellent worldwide communication linkages, and its advanced banking system that included a well-developed sector of Islamic banks.

Both Liow and Means have shown that the UMNO-led government has played an important role in enabling, though not outright and formally encouraging, extremism in the country by way of sanctioning religious revivalism and Islamisation. Patricia Martinez has cautioned that such political dealing with Islam exposes the country to “the danger in playing catch-up with fundamentalists and militants” to be the authority that define Islam for local Muslims. The government will always be in the losing end as “Southeast Asian Muslim ummah in the periphery of the Islamic world, many (but certainly not all) Muslims perceive everything in the heartland of the Middle East as authentic and best, and thus receive fundamentalists and militants as more pious when they adopt the idiom, language and culture of the heartland.”

Third, this report highlights the urgency for Muslims to re-look into the rhetoric of “enemies of Islam” used arbitrarily by members belonging to right wing ethno and religio centric groups such as UMNO and Perkasa. If violence is perceived as justifiable to defend Islam from its enemies, then there is a serious cause for Muslims to discern over the criteria required for one to be categorised as such.

The on-going controversy over the word ‘Allah’ is a good example; should Christians be categorised as ‘enemies of Islam’ simply because they use the word ‘Allah’ in their religious observation? The highest Islamic authority in Malaysia, the Department of Islamic Development (JAKIM), certainly thinks so, as seen in their disseminated Friday sermon dated 30 August 2013 in which Christians are called ‘musuh Islam’ (Malay: ‘Enemy of Islam’). One of the reasons JAKIM persistently forbids Christians from using the word ‘Allah’ is due to the allegation that such usage places Allah as one of three gods.[viii] This is another manifestation of UMNO-linked organisations’ flirting with extremism and their lack of discernment when it comes to other religions such as the concept of Christian Trinity.

JAKIM’s view goes against more than 400 signatories comprising Grand Muftis, Islamic scholars, and Muslim leaders around the world who endorse the document ‘A Common Word Between Us and You’. To these signatories, Islam and Christianity are founded on the common ground of monotheism. As stated in the summary of the document provided by the Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute for Islamic Thought in Jordan:

Whilst Islam and Christianity are obviously different religions—and whilst there is no minimising some of their formal differences—it is clear that the Two Greatest Commandments are an area of common ground and a link between the Qur’an, the Torah and the New Testament. What prefaces the Two Commandments in the Torah and the New Testament, and what they arise out of, is the Unity of God—that there is only one God. For the Shema in the Torah, starts: (Deuteronomy 6:4) Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one! Likewise, Jesus ( عليه سلام ) said: (Mark 12:29) “The first of all the commandments is: ‘Hear, O Israel, the LORD our God, the LORD is one”. Likewise, God says in the Holy Qur’an: Say: He, God, is One. / God, the Self-Sufficient Besought of all. (Al-Ikhlas, 112:1-2). Thus the Unity of God, love of Him, and love of the neighbour form a common ground upon which Islam and Christianity (and Judaism) are founded. (Emphasis added)

Commenting on this document, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, University Professor of Islamic Studies at the George Washington University, wrote:

There are already those on the Christian side who assert that the Christian God is not the same as Allah, who is an Arabic lunar deity or something like that. Such people who usually combine sheer ignorance with bigotry should attend a Sunday mass in Arabic in Bethlehem, Beirut, Amman, or Cairo and hear what Arabic term the Christians of these cities use for the Christian God.Nor is God simply to be identified with one member of the Christian Trinity, one part of three divinities that some Muslims believe wrongly that Christians worship. Allah, or God, is none other than the One God of Abraham, Isaac, Ishmael, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad. (Emphasis added)[ix]

It is urgent for Malaysian Muslims to be circumspect over the criteria required to categorise one as enemy of Islam and not to be manipulated by antagonistic rhetoric thrown around in the public and cyber space by extremists and also for the international community to continue treating UMNO as a secular party. In any case, it is also not difficult for any discerning person to notice the racist and extremist-inclined policies administered by UMNO and its affiliated groups such as JAKIM as being itselfanti-Islam. Although on occasions, a limited number of non-Muslims may have misconducted themselves before Islam; yet this is often due to their ignorance fed by local quasi-extremists who are allowed by UMNO to freely roam and roar around the country or merely exercising their rights within a democratic framework. Nonetheless non-Muslims’ misapprehension is categorically distinct from these quasi-extremist Muslims who advocate, propagate, and carry out fanatical activities in the name of Islam: the latter knowingly make use of Islam to promote anti-Islam values. It is the latter group that is against Islam. Perhaps they are the real enemies of Islam that the Ummah – both local and global needs to defend from.
​

Malaysia, Radical Islam on the rise

KUALA LAMPUR.MALAYSIAN SHIITE MUSLIMS PRAY AT A MOSQUE

MARCO TOSATTIROME

Is Malaysia slipping towards a form of “extremist” Islam? In a Country counting almost 28 million inhabitants, 3% of which are Catholics, 60% Muslims, 19% Buddhists, 8% Hindus and 6% Protestants, Muslim groups are moving in forces to take action against other religions trying to make converts among followers of Mohammed. Meanwhile, in the Country the controversy rages on, based on more or less credible accusations, often rather common, against Christians who would have tried to make converts. All of this while the trip of Kuala Lumpur’s Prime Minister to the Vatican is still fresh; a trip aimed at initiating the procedures to open diplomatic relations with the Holy See and while the dispute is still raging on the judgment of a Court that allows Christians the use of the word “Allah” to indicate God in the sacred texts in local language.


Twenty-two non-government organizations and the youth branch of the Parti Islam SeMalaysia (Pas) reignited the fire of thecontroversies asking that a law that forbidding apostasy is approved. All of this while the most recent accusations continue to fuel controversies. The main event of this new push towards a more extremist Islam, stronger and more oppressive (for the other religions) in Malaysia materialized a few days ago, when the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) introduced to the Prime Minister of Selangor a preliminary report on his raid during a fund raising dinner that took place over two weeks ago. The raid location was the Methodist Church “Daramsara Udama” in Petaling, in the Island of Jaya; according to the accusation the Christians present there were trying to make converts among some of the Muslim guests.

The raid was also seriously criticized by Christian leaders; no document authorizing it was presented, they said, and above all no proof that proselytism took place was introduced. Even this episode, however small, was sufficient for the Islamic organizations to issue a notification restating their commitment to “defending the faith of Muslims in this Country”. They stated that they would fight to maintain in force the existing legislation that forbids to make converts among Muslims and that they would request stronger laws against conversions.

“We decided unanimously to defend the Islamic faith in this Country from any form of transgression according to the position of Islam as the religion of the federation and legislations in force, and at the same time we ask for a law against apostasy.” The chief of the youth branch of the Parti Islam SeMalaysia, Nasrudin Hassan, said that since 1988 there have been recommendations for an anti-apostasy law, but Parliament never passed it. Hassan says that Islam is a “Religion of Conversation”, but a law is necessary for “those who cannot be persuaded with words.”

However, what is behind this activism? According the Catholic Bishop of Melaka-Johor, Paul Tan Chee, SJ, politicians are responsible for all the controversies that involved the Christian faith recently. “This is due to the manipulation and duplicity of politicians hunting for votes among gullible and ignorant people,” the Bishop said during an interview at a local newspaper. The dispute concerning the word “Allah” to indicate God in the Bible, the blocking of the Bibles in local language and the assumed Christian conspiracy to weaken the status of Islam in the country are matters that created problems between Christians and the Government.

Monsignor Paul Tan Chee said, “If this accusation is confirmed, I will do everything in my power to start a corrective and penitent action from the Christians side. Otherwise I will demand a disclaimer and apologies. It is really very simple,” and commenting on the words of Jais Marzuki Hassan’s Director, according to which the raid was directed to protect the interests of Muslims, the bishop replied, “I believe that the interests of Muslims are better protected if their representatives speak the truth, rather than spreading alarming rumors.” And he added, “However, if someone wishes to share our faith, we would not hesitate to do it, because we believe that faith can be proposed, but not imposed.” The 71 years old Jesuit was not impressed by the visit of the Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to the Vatican and by his meeting with Benedict XVI to establish diplomatic relations. He described it as “an the act that was only a facade, a false attempt by the Prime Minister.”

“Few things in Islam can ignite passion and violence like the topic of conversion,” Raymond Ibrahim writes, “the risks for the safety of those who convert from Islam, that is someone who becomes apostate, are well known”. However, he mentions another Arab and Egyptian intellectual, who provides additional elements of consideration. Montaser writes, “We, Muslims, have an inferiority complex, we feel that our religion must be confirmed constantly, practically every day thanks to Europeans and Americans who convert to Islam. What overwhelming joy befalls us when a European or an American citizen announces his or her conversion to Islam!

It is proof that we are in a constant state of fear, alarm, or chronic awaiting of a confirmation from Europe or America that our religion is okay.” And naturally if the conversion takes place the other way around, according to the thought of Khaled Montaser, we are faced with an opposite scenario. A seriously more distressing one.”

 

[northeast]

Malay Chinese blame chinese for things happened tens of years ago，yet they keep their mouth shut when they got discriminated by local malays.What a bunch of cowards and bitches，lmao.

 

[Lux de Veritas]

Malay Chinese blame chinese for things happened tens of years ago，yet they keep their mouth shut when they got discriminated by local malays.What a bunch of cowards and bitches，lmao.

It seems they are better than some PDF PRC who get shitt from CPC and still lick up CPC. Or are you guys CPC and their blood sucking 富二代?

 

[liaoliaoeryi]

Discrimination against Chinese in Malaysia for university places
Is Malaysia university entry a level playing field?

1. "Discrimination against Han ethnic in Malaysia for university places" is fitter.
I persumed if "chinese" is a muslim(not a han) from Uyghur, discrimination is little.
2. China has 56 ethnic races, rightly speaking "chinese=han ethnic, tibetan, mongolians etc".
在中国境内的所有民族为中国人（国家身份），国内汉民族也可叫汉人、华人（民族传承），国外的汉民族宜称为汉人、华人（民族传承）。 my english is not good, cann't clearly express my meaning in english, so write some in chinese.
3. Calling han people(out of china) as chinese,sometimes such a calling will confuse their identification, causing some unnecessary suspects form home countries. it isn't good for them.

 

[Jlaw]

The problem is not Malaysian Malay but radical Islam.

Many people tried to white wash Islam of responsibility but how far Malay and Chinese can go without Islam? Looking at the harmonious with Dayak, a Malay tribe, one can conclude that radical Islam makes people intolerant.

Almost all Islamic countries impose dhimmitude on others. Dhimmitude is insult, humiliation and extortion.

By the way is there such thing as "moderate" Islam?

Why do these capable Chinese living in Malaysia take this crap from the gov't? From post #227, Mr Soh cannot go to a gov't funded malay school. Can he not go to SG univ? Or China's university?

Why do wealthy Chinese still live in Malaysia?

 

[shuntmaster]

Malay Chinese blame chinese for things happened tens of years ago，yet they keep their mouth shut when they got discriminated by local malays.What a bunch of cowards and bitches，lmao.

Agree 100% on this. Chinese Malaysians are cowards who don't want to fight for their rights. They are very happy in their own comfort zones and don't want to do anything which disturbs their cozy lives. They just stood and watched on the sidelines when the Indian Malaysians (HINDRAF) was fighting for the rights of all ethnic minorities in Malaysia and the Malays were persecuting them severely.

Why do these capable Chinese living in Malaysia take this crap from the gov't? From post #227, Mr Soh cannot go to a gov't funded malay school. Can he not go to SG univ? Or China's university?

Why do wealthy Chinese still live in Malaysia?

Read my post above. Chinese Malaysians are basically cowards to fight for their rights. Most of them are already emigrating to other countries, mostly to Singapore and Australia.

 

[Lux de Veritas]

Why do these capable Chinese living in Malaysia take this crap from the gov't? From post #227, Mr Soh cannot go to a gov't funded malay school. Can he not go to SG univ? Or China's university?

Why do wealthy Chinese still live in Malaysia?

Malaysia is still way richer than many other countries in SE Asia, so many Malaysian just endure. Many smart Malaysian migrated.

The rich Malaysian Chinese do not migrate. They stay in Malaysia, but they move some wealth oversea. This guy below from Malaysia, Robert Kuok is one of world richest Chinese with wealth of USD20 billion.

The rich Chinese benefit immensely from the corrupt Malaysian government.

The one who are unhappy are the Chinese peasants. The smart and educated one migrated. The not so smart one stay behind as they are less mobile.

Not that the Chinese elites do not care about the insults of Islamist, but the Chinese elites can find balanced psychological when the corrupt Malays deliver to them billions and billions.

The Chinese elites do not have to deal with average sectarian conflict and they fly everywhere in the world.

The average Chinese peasant feel things differently.

 

[Jlaw]

Malaysia is still way richer than many other countries in SE Asia, so many Malaysian just endure. Many smart Malaysian migrated.

The rich Malaysian Chinese do not migrate. They stay in Malaysia, but they move some wealth oversea. This guy below from Malaysia, Robert Kuok is one of world richest Chinese with wealth of USD20 billion.

The rich Chinese benefit immensely from the corrupt Malaysian government.

The one who are unhappy are the Chinese peasants. The smart and educated one migrated. The not so smart one stay behind as they are less mobile.

Maybe Shuntmaster was right. The SE Malay Chinese are cowards.

 

[Lux de Veritas]

Maybe Shuntmaster was right. The SE Malay Chinese are cowards.

Chinese use very little violent.

Our violent are normally in abnormal times, like civil wars and revolution. That time, Chinese show our full cruelty.

In day to day life, Chinese stooges and endure insults, then we work very hard to better ourselves, and hope to re-negotiate better deals.

 

[Jlaw]

Chinese use very little violent.

Our violent are normally in abnormal times, like civil wars and revolution. That time, Chinese show our full cruelty.

In day to day life, Chinese stooges and endure insults, then we work very hard to better ourselves, and hope to re-negotiate better deals.

That's one thing I don't like about the Malay and Indonesian Chinese. Taking insults being pushed around and not do anything about it. What's worse are the rich Chinese who don't use their money wisely to help end the Chinese discrimination.

Only saving violent against other Chinese.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Chinese use very little violent.

Our violent are normally in abnormal times, like civil wars and revolution. That time, Chinese show our full cruelty.

In day to day life, Chinese stooges and endure insults, then we work very hard to better ourselves, and hope to re-negotiate better deals.

Come back to China if they had enough with this racism.

 

[Lux de Veritas]

That's one thing I don't like about the Malay and Indonesian Chinese. Taking insults being pushed around and not do anything about it. What's worse are the rich Chinese who don't use their money wisely to help end the Chinese discrimination.

Only saving violent against other Chinese.

Chinese rich people behave everywhere the same in the world. Chinese elites need to learn to be like German elites who take care of their people.

Look at HK. They already have higher GDP than Germany, but Germany have free healthcare and free education. HK elites forces their people to work like crazy to enrich themselves.

I do not mean only HK, but same thing happen in SG, China, Thailand and Indonesia.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

CCTV's documentary series about the Southeast Asian Chinese.