livingdead
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2011
- Messages
- 22,952
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Yeap. I do.
This is why you won't find me asking vague questions (or mocking questions on Sati) about Gita or Hinduism. I think it is a beautiful religion at its core like every other religion.
Most parts I can understand by myself.
The rest,
Well how long does it take to find meaning of a term or word in google. few clicks may be.
Then I am blessed with friends from all faiths now. In case a term in Torah, Bible, or Gita is really difficult for me, I may ask a knowledgeable person from that faith. I won't come to PDF and pose mocking questions.
This is a great age we live in.
We must strive for and find knowledge as a "believer" and not as a "mocker" or hypocrite.
And know I am not pointing fingers at anyone.
Why do I need to anyways.
Thank you
Well then lets agree to disagree here. Surely if you have interest then nothing wrong in getting more knowledge about anything, including theology.
I dont, currently, its too much hardwork for me.
We are arguing about sharia law here, as there is a demand to bring it in, with a promise that it will make things better. Its reasonable for us skeptics to ask for clarification about certain laws from the people who support it. I would do so irrespective of source (whether islamic, hindu or mayan scripture).
I promise, If you ever find me making such positive assertion (say arguing about laws during Ashoka period being made state law in India, to reduce crimes like rape), I would give enough evidence and argument, rather than asking skeptics to read the inscriptions. Surely they are welcome to read and learn, though.
I have observed such point being raised just to avoid arguments, basically to shut up critics, hence 5 of my lengthy posts are about why to avoid reading stuff. (also I am quite lazy).