What's new

Mahoza, A Jewish Kingdom At War With Sassanid Iran

Iran responded to the attack. Traitors are those who rehash Taleban propaganda claiming Iran's counter-shelling did no damage.
it was so effective that they used fake photo from last year when Taliban was fighting opposition groups as evidence . clearly shows who is not strong with truth.
Indeed, she didn't.
read history .
No such thing took place.
yeah , we have quran , if they are in accordance with it there is no need of them and if they are against it , they are lies and must be destroyed .
No, for your information the Taleban are no native Arab speakers. So my response to the user was right either way and you have no point, once again.
you claim USA was the last one that attacked Iran and i showed your statement was not based on any fact, their language have no role here
Isra"el" is not a people, it's an illegitimate regime.
Arabs is a group , let put Zionists instead of Israel to satisfy you
You are supposed to work at a hospital, not spend several hours per day spreading zionist propaganda on a forum. Don't blow your cover.
and when i'm at hospital i'm not at my computer and interesting thing about my specialty is when i 'm not at hospital my time belong to me and i can spend it as i like and sadly for you unlike other specialty there are laws which dictate how much i can stay in hospital and if i stay more than that its against the law and more importantly there are wonderful devices called cell phone we use them both for work and when we have spare time for other things

98% of Iranian voted to IR

No one attacked Iran
actually that plebiscite was like it
do you want islamic republic ? yes/No
and was held 46 year ago , two generation changed since then so if at the time you conclude that 98% Iranian actually wanted islamic republic there is no reason the percentage have not changed in last 46 year .
by the way as a matter of fact my father says he voted more than once in that plebiscite without having his birth certificate with him
 
Last edited:
What I find ridiculous is that a non Iranian person is trying to tell us what our history is and who our enemy should be ...

Go tell that to the Iranian people who's sons and fathers were killed by Arab bullets..:undecided:
 
it was so effective that they used fake photo from last year when Taliban was fighting opposition groups as evidence . clearly shows who is not strong with truth.

No high ranking government or military official misrepresented any photograph. Only Taleban propagandists and local reformist / moderate traitors echoing the lie believe Iranian forces are incapable of effective counter-fire.

read history .

...which you are ignorant of.

yeah , we have quran , if they are in accordance with it there is no need of them and if they are against it , they are lies and must be destroyed .

Thoroughly incomprehensible elucubrations.

you claim USA was the last one that attacked Iran and i showed your statement was not based on any fact, their language have no role here

I was addressing the following absurd claim: "last time that some one attacked Iran they spoke Arabic" (exact quote). This is untrue and I demonstrated it.

Of course you deliberately ignored the falsehood as well as the fact that your oppositionist associate chose to focus on the language practiced by the aggressor, because anti-Arab racialism plays into the zionist agenda you serve.

My response was totally factual. At least the three latest armed attacks on Islamic Iran have been carried out by separatist and/or sectarianist CIA-proxies along Iran's western and southeastern borders. So you "showed" strictly nothing of the sort, all you did was to underscore how little clue you have.

Arabs is a group , let put Zionists instead of Israel to satisfy you

Arabs are a people. My statement clearly mentioned people and nothing else. Regimes are a completely different matter.

and when i'm at hospital i'm not at my computer and interesting thing about my specialty is when i 'm not at hospital my time belong to me and i can spend it as i like and sadly for you unlike other specialty there are laws which dictate how much i can stay in hospital and if i stay more than that its against the law and more importantly there are wonderful devices called cell phone we use them both for work and when we have spare time for other things

Spare us those fairy tales.

actually that plebiscite was like it
do you want islamic republic ? yes/No
and was held 46 year ago , two generation changed since then so if at the time you conclude that 98% Iranian actually wanted islamic republic there is no reason the percentage have not changed in last 46 year .

No government on earth will hold periodic referenda about the very existence of its underlying political order.

by the way as a matter of fact my father says he voted more than once in that plebiscite without having his birth certificate with him

Wouldn't have changed anything if it were otherwise.

Also, this goes to highlight the confidence Revolutionaries had in the outcome of the vote. Otherwise opponents to the establishment of an Islamic Republic could have tilted the balance by casting multiple votes each, had their numbers been comparable to proponents of the Islamic Republic.



What I find ridiculous is that a non Iranian person is trying to tell us what our history is and who our enemy should be ...

I am Iranian. As opposed to two of your closest relatives.

Also your romanticized vision of history and your idea of who Iran's enemies are, were precisely formulated by non-Iranians representing western and zionist imperial powers, and were transmitted to you by their (paid) Iranian agents and their mass media you follow.

Go tell that to the Iranian people who's sons and fathers were killed by Arab bullets..:undecided:

Why don't you go study the history of the Imposed War rather than issuing blatantly counterfactual statements.

Oh, and weaponry used by Saddam wasn't exactly "Arab" either. Something our martyrs and war heroes were and are perfectly aware of. Hence their characterization of the USA regime - not of any "Arabs", as sheytāne bozorg, in line with Al-Imam Al-Khumayni's (r.) sound strategic outlook.

But this is already a tad too complex for obsessed, embittered individuals to grasp.
 
Last edited:
No high ranking government or military official misrepresented any photograph. Only Taleban propagandists and local reformist / moderate traitors echoing the lie believe Iranian forces are incapable of effective counter-fire.
show evidence
...which you are ignorant of
کافر همه را به کیش خویش پندارد​
Thoroughly incomprehensible elucubrations.
tell that to the second Caliph
Arabs are a people. My statement clearly mentioned people and nothing else. Regimes are a completely different matter.
Zionists are people , Zionism is an ideology
Spare us those fairy tales.
like the fairy-tale that you are Iranian ?

No government on earth will hold periodic referenda about the very existence of its underlying political order.
let see,........ Scotland
and half a century is not periodic and nobody consider what happened 46 year ago as representative of what today situation is.
I was addressing the following absurd claim: "last time that some one attacked Iran they spoke Arabic" (exact quote). This is untrue and I demonstrated it.
and i demonstrated you are wrong
Wouldn't have changed anything if it were otherwise.

Also, this goes to highlight the confidence Revolutionaries had in the outcome of the vote. Otherwise opponents to the establishment of an Islamic Republic could have tilted the balance by casting multiple votes each, had their numbers been comparable to proponents of the Islamic Republic.
don't knew, he was part of the group that was organizing demonstration before the revolution .
 
show evidence

Proven quality of Iranian-made armaments and the proficiency of the Iranian military to reliably strike targets located a couple of hundred meters away.

Liberals assume otherwise due to their contempt for anything Iranian.

کافر همه را به کیش خویش پندارد​

You're confusing history with romanticized story-telling exported to the region on slave ships by zionist and western imperialists, your favorite reading material.

tell that to the second Caliph

The one from zionist comic books for brown sahibs, or the person studied by qualified and serious scholars?

Zionists are people , Zionism is an ideology

The zionist entity is a regime.

Zionists may be people but they are not a people.

like the fairy-tale that you are Iranian ?

Safe to say more than you. I don't go around trying to legitimize cooperation with hostile foreign powers aka treason. So my credentials aren't merely formal.

let see,........ Scotland

No referendum held on the nature of the internal Scottish political order.

Foundational, not repetitive referendum.

and half a century is not periodic

Sure is.

and nobody consider what happened 46 year ago as representative of what today situation is.

Empty rant.

and i demonstrated you are wrong

Last entity to attack Iran was a CIA-sponsored separatist and/or sectarianist terrorist group not the Taleban. Therefore your allegation was baseless and you did not demonstrate anything of the sort.
 
Last edited:
There is no such thing as a Jewish state

It was under Persians and Babylons
 
There is no such thing as a Jewish state

It was under Persians and Babylons

Zoroastrian Iranians destroyed the short lived Jewish kingdom. You know, the heirs of Cyrus and Darius. Didn't even allow it to gain a steady foothold, they simply wiped it off the map at the first opportunity.

This historic fact is making zionist- and NATO-apologetic Iranian gusanos extremely uncomfortable. Hence their rhetoric fallacies intended to derail the thread with off-topic whataboutisms on the Arab conquest of Iran, the Iran-Iraq war etc.
 
Last edited:
Proven quality of Iranian-made armaments and the proficiency of the Iranian military to reliably strike targets located a couple of hundred meters away.

Liberals assume otherwise due to their contempt for anything Iranian.
in short no evidence and what was presented as evidence proven to be fake

Safe to say more than you. I don't go around trying to legitimize cooperation with hostile foreign powers aka treason. So my credentials aren't merely formal.
have any complaint , go made it to Iran parliament and judiciary system , that's iran law as an Iranian I knew it , but false flaggers are not aware of it

Empty rant.
Fact

Last entity to attack Iran was a CIA-sponsored separatist and/or sectarianist terrorist group not the Taleban. Therefore your allegation was baseless and you did not demonstrate anything of the sort.
not USA then , the separatists by definition are Iranian so you are wrong and i stand correct
 
All Arabs are not against Iran.

sunni wahhabies hate iran because of religion and panarabs hate Iran because of racist nationalism (for example saddam)

Also most shia Arabs love iran because of religion.

Taliban are pashtuns, an Iranian ethnic group, but they hate iran.
Also many of kurds hate iran, they are Iranian people too.

Enemies of iran are not some races.
 
Last edited:
Then how do you explain the violent expansion of Islam in the years of MD and the first Caliphs?
We don't consider these caliphs as a true leader of muslims.

Shia only believe 12 Imams as a true leader of muslims after prophet Muhammad.
 
We don't consider these caliphs as a true leader of muslims.

Shia only believe 12 Imams as a true leader of muslims after prophet Muhammad.
You don't believe that the first 4 caliphs were legitimate?
 
You don't believe that the first 4 caliphs were legitimate?
only imam Ali was rightful.

According to Islam only attack on "kafir harbi"is acceptable.

Kafir harbi mean nonbelievers that want to attack muslims.
 
Last edited:
Then how do you explain the violent expansion of Islam in the years of MD and the first Caliphs?
Read history of Islam if you want to know the truth.

All of prophet Muhammed's (pbuh) wars were conducted against Arab monarchs who intended to destroy the small population of Muslims. Prophet broke the waste of tyrant Arab kingdoms, the kingdoms that had spreaded all over the Arabian peninsula.

When we say wars, in all of them prophet was defending himself except attack on Kheybar where Arab kingdoms and Jewish planners were united with each. Prophet first defused the threat of Arabs then brought Jews under control in Arabian Peninsula.

We don't disrespect the Sunni caliphs, Obviously they ruled Arabian Peninsula illegaly from Shia POV, but we are critical of their actions. You maybe ask why didn't Shias revolt against them? Because we always wanted unity of Muslims hence never raised arms against Sunni caliphs of that time.
 
you don't care it was hamas who taught our battle strategies to ISIS in Syria.
and as I recall you didn't care when Taliban directly
What the heck nonsense are you posting. Hamas has no presence in Syria. And never had any presence beyond few diplomatic stations in Syria.

Second of all, you aren't teaching anything. Hamas has more urban combat experience than you do. You are narcissistic people trying to take credit for everything and anything. Like Israel. Like trump. If anything, you would need to learn from Hamas guerilla warfare tactics. Even Hezbollah, which you claim you trained, is actually training your whole army and militias in Syria. And are better trained than your whole army.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom