Kabira
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 14,383
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
And what about Kushans successors of Kanishka who ruled you from Peshawar
They were vassals of Samudragupta sending their women folk and tribute as his Vassals.
View attachment 222050
No offence but Kushan maybe bhudist but racially he was not Indian, they came from western China. Your gupta empire map is 100% wrong, they never crossed Satluj river so forget about ruling Pakistan. At that time Kushans were rulers of Indus valley. Only Mauryas are believed to have ruled Pakistan, but there is some doubts about their racial origins. Maurya was groomed by Pakistani Chanakya. Maurya was also in Pakistan at the time of Alexander invasion. Having capital in Bihar does not make him Indian.
The rulers and soldiers of the Ghaznavid Kingdom were Turkic slave soldiers who were also called as
Mamluks. Their history dates back to the Arab invasion of Central Asia. The Arabs captured and
enslaved the Turks and made them to loyal slave soldiers. Later these Turkic soldiers revolted
and established their own Kingdom.
The Chola Emperors were true Indians who are of noble descent. All the medieval Chola Emperors
traced their genealogy back to famous ancient Chola Kings. Unlike the Turkic Slave rulers
the Chola Emperors had royal blood.
Chola emperos claimed ancient Rig Vedic ancestry. Basically they were decendents of barbaric aryan invaders which from your pov make them noble. lol
Last edited: