What's new

Maharana Pratap Was Great, Not Akbar: UP CM Yogi Adityanath

undercover JIX

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Maharana Pratap Was Great, Not Akbar: UP CM Yogi Adityanath
Adityanath said Akbar had asked Pratap to accept him as the king and promised in return that he would not interfere in the affairs of his kingdom of Mewar. He said even Jaipur king Man Singh came as a messenger but Pratap refused.

Maharana Pratap Was Great, Not Akbar: UP CM Yogi Adityanath

New Delhi: Discarding the popular belief that Akbar was great, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has claimed that only 16th century Mewar king Maharana Pratap held that eminence as he refused to accept Akbar as the emperor since a “Turk could not be trusted”.

While addressing an RSS gathering to mark the Mewar king’s birth celebrations on Thursday, the chief minister maintained Pratap remained relevant even after 500 years of his death. A special edition of RSS magazine ‘Avadh Prahri’ was also released on the occasion.

According to a report in The Indian Express, Yogi referred to the 1576 Haldighati battle and said it was unimportant who won or lost. “It is important that Maharana Pratap fought it for several years in the hills of Aravalli with his self-respect and ultimately won back his forts.” He said Pratap set an example of bravery as the fight was not for a day but went on for years.

“Maharana Pratap proved it was not Akbar who was great but only Maharana Pratap was great by ultimately winning back his forts.”

Adityanath said Akbar had asked Pratap to accept him as the king and promised in return that he would not interfere in the affairs of his kingdom of Mewar. He said even Jaipur king Man Singh came as a messenger but Pratap refused.

“I cannot accept Akbar as the king… he is a Turk and he will remain so… he will hurt our self-respect in the garb of friendship… we cannot accept a foreigner as a king,’’ Adityanath quoted Pratap as saying amid chants of “jai Shri Ram”.

The statement comes a month after some reports claimed that the Yogi-government is mulling to rechristen Allahabad as ‘Prayag’, a long pending demand of sadhus and saints of the Sangam City.

A news report in Pioneer stated that the new name was likely to be approved by the state cabinet soon.

“The wrong that the Mughal emperor did should be corrected. We expect that the Chief Minister will issue orders towards changing the name of Allahabad to Prayagraj,” Akhil Bharatiya Akhara Parishad president Mahant Narendra Giri had told the newspaper.

On Thursday, the UP CM claimed there were other kings in those times who put their own self-respect at stake to accept Akbar as king. Adityanath added Pratap stood against all odds.

He said lessons from those times were still applicable. Adityanath claimed some people are ready to disturb their own society, culture and country even today for their benefits. He added that they then suffer damage.

Adityanath asked scheduled castes, tribes and backward communities to regard themselves as Pratap’s descendent. “It was actually these tribes, which made Pratap great,” he said.

“On whose strength did Maharana Pratap fight… it was castes whom we today call Dalit, backward and Vanvasi…,’’ he said. Adityanath added Pratap fought in adverse conditions and Akbar was unable to hurt him.

https://www.news18.com/news/politic...bar-claims-up-cm-yogi-adityanath-1779325.html
 
About time...India is a Hindu land....all those city names that were changed under the Mughal occupation to Islamic names....should be changed asap.
 
About time...India is a Hindu land....all those city names that were changed under the Mughal occupation to Islamic names....should be changed asap.

india is a secular country , muslims or hindu all are our asset.
 
india is a secular country , muslims or hindu all are our asset.


We are secular...but certain names of holy towns that were forcefully changed.....should be and Indian muslims being secular wont have a problem with it.....they understand the ground realities and they surely understand history pretty damn well than foreigners and Pakistani's.
 
We are secular...but certain names of holy towns that were forcefully changed.....should be and Indian muslims being secular wont have a problem with it.....they understand the ground realities and they surely understand history pretty damn well than foreigners and Pakistani's.

which city's name changed ? pl elaborate ?
 
“I cannot accept Akbar as the king… he is a Turk and he will remain so… he will hurt our self-respect in the garb of friendship… we cannot accept a foreigner as a king,’’ Adityanath quoted Pratap as saying amid chants of “jai Shri Ram”.
Very balanced POV

The statement comes a month after some reports claimed that the Yogi-government is mulling to rechristen Allahabad as ‘Prayag’, a long pending demand of sadhus and saints of the Sangam City.

Prayag sounds like good cultural name. Lots of juice in it.
So after Hyderabad Deccan, now Allahabad. What about Ajmer and Bareli?
 
Ajay Singh Bisht is a tribal warlord who is living in 15th century.

About time...India is a Hindu land....all those city names that were changed under the Mughal occupation to Islamic names....should be changed asap.
What Hindu land? India is also the land of Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Adivasis and all others. India is not the land of cow and gobar-gaumootra. India's cow dung wealth should be dumped on to the mouth of all RSS swayamsevaks and air bombed over their NHQ at Nagpur.
 
Ajay Singh Bisht is a tribal warlord who is living in 15th century.


What Hindu land? India is also the land of Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Adivasis and all others. India is not the land of cow and gobar-gaumootra. India's cow dung wealth should be dumped on to the mouth of all RSS swayamsevaks and air bombed over their NHQ at Nagpur.
Nonsense. All land belongs to Him.
 
What Hindu land? India is also the land of Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Adivasis and all others. India is not the land of cow and gobar-gaumootra. India's cow dung wealth should be dumped on to the mouth of all RSS swayamsevaks and air bombed over their NHQ at Nagpur.
India also belongs to Hindus too (not every Hindu is RSS Sanghi). And Parsi, Jew and ahmedi.
And India is the land of cows, and we treat cows with respect, there is nothing wrong with that. And yes it is the land of gobar-gaumootra, India's cow dung wealth helps in feeding a lot of mouths. Posh ones can go on the Internet and make fun of it how many times they want.

Also, RSS swayamsevaks are Indians whether you like it or not. So, they will not be bombed, no matter how many of you lot wants to do it.
 
But he does not have the guts to change the names back.
He does not have the guts to reclaim the lost temples and viharas.
I am okay with an occasional rant like this. Entertainment by , for and of Hindus. :haha:
 
India belongs to Indians.

The Hindu-only narrative remains limited to the Hindu-only government.

Cheers, Doc
 
Not at all. They are more or less Islamists who haven't recited Kalima yet. Their motto is Hindu Ummah. They suck up to Golwalkar, Godse, British shoelicker, Headdogwar and other Cow terrorists and hates Abrahamic minorities. Whom are you kidding? World knows your kind. RSS is not India. Hindus and RSS Hindutva are two different things. RSS Swayamsevak are Nazis. They are against us, the minorities of India and others. RSS's agenda, as if we don't know? Sangh Sakthi murdabad. http://www.stopfundinghate.org/resources/rssprimer.htm
Hindus and rss are different?
Since when do Maronites or Sunnis become Hardcore Sanghi?
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom