What's new

Lockheed May Pitch F-35 to Rejoin $11 Billion India Jet Contest

The F-35 costs considerably more then the Eurofighter or rafale,
does that mean the number will be less than 126?
or will the option for more be exercised in the initial order?
 
Not only for next 30 years, always we will be techinically ahead, even EFt/MKI/Mig35 can easily defeat J20 in A2A combat.

:what:
It seems you know more about the J-20 then us, plz enlighten us on it's capabilities!
 
The F-35 costs considerably more then the Eurofighter or rafale,
does that mean the number will be less than 126?
or will the option for more be exercised in the initial order?
No the no may increase as any way if we are buying 100 + aircrafts why not 200 in future?More TOT and customisation advantages.
If we go for F-35, we ll have either Mig35/Gripen/Su35 and mirage upgrade to fill the gap.
 
The F-35 costs considerably more then the Eurofighter or rafale,
does that mean the number will be less than 126?
or will the option for more be exercised in the initial order?

Only like 20% more then the EF.

And worth it too.
 
Iam not criticising J20 even i say the same for AMCa before 2030's. No bad intention in me. U have to agree the fact.

What I'm trying to say is that, we don't know anything about the J-20!
The PLA keeps all it's projects in total secrecy, you can't assume such things until all aspects of it are confirmed.
 
No way in hell finance minister or CCS will agree to this decision of buying an a/c that costs 150 mil a piece( todays price? ). There is a reason why CCS took a decision of FGFA and AMCA. Both are supossed to cost 100 mill or less. So its a 20-25 billion deal spread over 10 years each. While the former brings back half the invested money, the later will will be invested everything in India alone.
If an F-35 no TOT buying off the shelf will put a dent of $20 billion. Its giving away money to US to buy an aircraft covered with as many uncertainities.


All that glitters is not gold........
 
No way in hell finance minister or CCS will agree to this decision of buying an a/c that costs 150 mil a piece( todays price? ). There is a reason why CCS took a decision of FGFA and AMCA. Both are supossed to cost 100 mill or less. So its a 20-25 billion deal spread over 10 years each. While the former brings back half the invested money, the later will will be invested everything in India alone.
If an F-35 no TOT buying off the shelf will put a dent of $20 billion. Its giving away money to US to buy an aircraft covered with as many uncertainities.


All that glitters is not gold........

I would have thought Rafale with ToT would be the better option.
AMCA, FGFA and PAK FA would be the 5th gen.
 
Paris 2011: What Will the F-35 Cost?

June 20, 2011:what:


After the preliminary design review was completed on schedule in April 2003, every subsequent milestone in the F-35 program was missed by at least one year. Yet Lockheed Martin continued to exude optimism, rejecting criticism that production was being ramped up before development and producibility issues were solved. The company’s credibility having been dented, its predictions that the ultimate unit cost of the first stealthy international fighter jet could still be $60 million (F-35A CTOL version, 2010 dollars) are raising eyebrows–especially when the cost has been contradicted by various U.S. government reports.


The Government Accountability Office (GAO) talks of a “near doubling” in average unit prices since the program began. When the F-35 program breached the Nunn-McCurdy Act 12 months ago, the Pentagon predicted to Congress an average unit production cost of $133 million in current dollars.
But the unit cost of an F-35 will vary greatly depending on sub-type, and whether it is contracted within the low-rate initial production (LRIP) Lots or the supposedly much more efficient multi-year buys (MYBs) that will follow. As things stand, however, the MYBs will not begin until fiscal year 2018, two years later than previously planned. So there will now be 11 LRIP buys.


Lockheed Martin said the ramp-up rate is the key to affordability. It is still planning for a peak production rate of 20 aircraft per month. But as the GAO noted, the F-35 program places unprecedented demands for funding–an average $11 billion per year for the next two decades–on a shrinking defense budget. The implication is that the U.S. will not be able to afford anything like the 2,443 aircraft that it currently plans to buy.


The 30 LRIP Lot 4 jets are the first to be contracted on a fixed-price-incentive-fee basis. When the separately contracted cost of the F135 engine is added ($15 million for the F-35A CTOL and F-35C CV engine, and $32 million for the F-35B STOVL engine), the unit cost comes to $126.6 million each for the 11 F-35As, S141.4 million each for the 17 F-35Bs and $157.9 million for the four F-35Cs.


Lockheed Martin will receive another $511 million for the logistics and sustainment of these aircraft, on a cost-reimbursable, not-to-exceed basis. The F-35 Joint Program Office said it cannot yet adequately identify and price risk to negotiate fixed-price contracts for support. Further, Lockheed Martin received a contract worth $820 million to prepare for increased production rates in future years, again on a cost-reimbursable, not-to-exceed basis.


Negotiations on logistics and sustainment packages continue and are a major focus for the JPO this year. The GAO now says “current F-35 life-cycle cost estimates are considerably higher than the legacy aircraft it will replace.”:disagree:


Last year, the U.S. Navy predicted that total life-cycle costs for the F-35 program would exceed one trillion dollars.

How does Lockheed Martin react to that startling statistic? “That figure is based on all 2,443 planned aircraft for the U.S. flying for 52 years from more than 50 bases, using cost data derived from legacy aircraft in then-year dollars,” O’Bryan said.

“The F-35 is subject to more key performance parameters (KPPs) relating to sustainment than any other fighter jet,” he said. “For instance, after 200,000 fleet hours it must be twice as reliable as an F-16 or an F-18.”


F-35s Unit Cost Not the Whole Story


According to some observers, there is unquantifiable value in some of the avionics advances in the Lockheed-Martin F-35.
In a presentation at the Mitchell Centre for Airpower Studies last year, Barry Watts, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment, said, “If you look at F-117 and B-2 missions, low observability doesn’t give you [total] invisibility to air defenses, particularly to radar-guided SAMs.


“Those routes [to the target], relative to the defenses that we were aware of, had to be carefully planned prior to the mission,” Watts continued. “This airplane’s going to be able to do that in real time [thanks to] the huge amount of computational power that’s available.”


In another presentation given at the same event, Lt. Gen. David Deptula, former U.S. Air Force Deputy Chief of Staff, A-2, stated, “With the ability to rapidly collect, analyze, transmit, display and share decision-quality information across a wide battlespace rapidly...we create...a value that becomes more important than individual unit cost.


“The F-35 can take a SAR [synthetic aperture radar] map down to a very fine degree, add that SAR image to its ground moving target indicator and display the difference between fixed and moving, land or maritime,” said Deptula. “This is something we have to do today with several separate aircraft and a ground station.”

Paris 2011: What Will the F-35 Cost?: AINonline
 
this will make mmrca start 2020 heheheheheh its almost 10 years now IAF ask gov for emergancy need of new jets.

Dont worry IAF will order another batch of 40 Su30MKI to tie over the delay if we go for F35

As u must be knowing that due to delay in mmrca , IAF has ordered 82 more Su30MKI than what it had originally planned
If India does decide to ditch rafale and go in for F35 , then IAF will order another batch of 40 MKI
 
What I'm trying to say is that, we don't know anything about the J-20!
The PLA keeps all it's projects in total secrecy, you can't assume such things until all aspects of it are confirmed.

I dont think that the J-20 can compete toe-to-toe with the F-35.maybe in kinematic performance the J-20 is a little better than the F-35 but in avionics sector the F-35 beats the J-20 anytime.I dont think that China can develop an AESA as good as the AN/APG-81 which is used by F-35 and neither can match the latest phased array EW suites and jammers developed by US for the F-35.The USA in terms of avionics and other associated electronic equipment for fighter jets is a generation ahead of China.
 
Why not they give it for free?
We promise we will use it only against terrorists..


20090916_fingers_crossed.jpg
We use it only against naxals.
 
I dont think that the J-20 can compete toe-to-toe with the F-35.maybe in kinematic performance the J-20 is a little better than the F-35 but in avionics sector the F-35 beats the J-20 anytime.I dont think that China can develop an AESA as good as the AN/APG-81 which is used by F-35 and neither can match the latest phased array EW suites and jammers developed by US for the F-35.The USA in terms of avionics and other associated electronic equipment for fighter jets is a generation ahead of China.

U could be right but nobody knowz what China got in its hand.....:what:
 
A very tempting offer indeed.
but we should also consider various aspect that comes along with it:
India could only get its hand on F-35 post 2020 ( deliveries will only begin 2018).
No tech transfer.
CISMOA and related sanction prone deals.



I think this proposal is only to put pressure on IAF and MOD, we must pursue the mmrca in the due course.
the F-35 also undermines the AMCA, which atleast is envisaged to perform as in par with F-35.
 
Back
Top Bottom