What's new

Leading causes for death of US children

Why would the US not care about its own national security?

Many believe their openness is being abused by foreign state interests. A bad externality of having despotic governments around the world, some being quite big.

No other countries can come close to US when it comes to global propaganda , lying and cheating.
 
.
So I m not supposed to quote Chinese media? or I m not supposed to quote western media?
Find something critical in your own media - as critical as the one you find daily in the Western media on a daily basis.

Do not feint stupid.
 
.
E2j7ksiX0AU-P55.jpg
 
.
No other countries can come close to US when it comes to global propaganda , lying and cheating.

It is so much propaganda that you are able find tens of articles in the US media highly critical of the US government on a daily basis.
 
Last edited:
.
Find something critical in your own media - as critical as the one you find daily in the Western media on a daily basis.

Do not feint stupid.
I can see many in Chinese language media, but I m myself, we all have positions and my postition is to defend China, you do know this, don't you?

It is so much propaganda that you are able find tens of articles in the US media highly critical of the US government.
Token facade of free media is just a more tricky method to do mainstream overwhelmingly intended propaganda, that's why Americans are way more brainwashed than the average Chinese.

Chinese students better at spotting fake news – Pisa
Students in East Asia are better at distinguishing a fact from an opinion than UK students, the latest Programme for International Student Assessment results show

By Claudia Civinini

03 December 2019

iStock-1141746844.jpg


Students in East Asia, including parts of China, can differentiate between facts and opinions better than students in the UK, according to the latest findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa).

The reading test in Pisa includes an assessment of the ability to tell whether a source is credible, to recognise bias and identify authors’ intentions.

The ability to differentiate between fact and opinion is considered to be at level 5 or above on Pisa’s six levels of reading proficiency.

On average across all countries, 7.4 per cent of 15 year olds achieve a level five, and 1.3 per cent get up to level six – the UK is slightly above that, with 9.5 per cent at level 5 and 3 per cent at level 6.

But in the four provinces of China Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (B-S-J-Z), which topped every single ranking in Pisa, 22 per cent of students read at level five or above, and 4.2 per cent are at level six.

For Singapore, the percentage of top performers is triple that of OECD average – 26 per cent of students achieved a level five or above, with 7.3 per cent reaching level six.

Referring to high-performing countries in Asia and East Asia, Pisa coordinator Andreas Schleicher said: “The capacity of students in those regions to deal with ambiguous, complex information, to think creatively about solutions, to navigate fake news is actually a lot better than in the case of the UK.

“Those countries are now developing very sophisticated skill sets among their young people, that involve complex problem solving skills, creative skills, critical thinking skills".

However, on average, only around 8.7 per cent of students across the OECD countries were at level 5 or above, meaning that less than one student in every 10 was skilled at distinguishing fact from opinion.

Joint general secretary of the NEU teaching union Kevin Courtney singled out the finding as a reason for concern and added that reading should be fostered as a habit for life.

He said: “The finding that globally fewer than 1 in 10 students was able to distinguish between fact and opinion is extremely worrying in an era of fake news.

“As the OECD points out, reading is no longer mainly about extracting information; it is about constructing knowledge, thinking critically and making well-founded judgements.

"We need to ensure that our education system focuses on developing these skills in our young people, not simply on cramming them with facts."

For the first time in 2018, the reading test was carried out in most countries with a computer-based, adaptive test.

The new assessment was developed in response to criticisms that the tests are “one-size fits all”.

Read more about the Pisa results 2018 here.

https://www.tes.com/news/chinese-students-better-spotting-fake-news-pisa
 
.

Shouldn't we congratulate him on being honest?

It would be naive that states do not lie, cheat or steal. He seems to have said what's obvious.

But, that's beside the point. What happened to him?

He was criticized, ridiculed, belittled (as much as the vice versa) in his national media and social media.

His party lost elections.

He had to peacefully quit his job in the government, and become a private citizen.

No one got arrested for criticizing him, his party, his boss, the President.

People enjoyed full freedom of speech.

Now, take this case and apply it to any tyranny? Would it be possible?

Now, is it always because governments are so great hence lack of criticism in the media.

Again, you are enjoying freedom of expression provided in the US even though you may not be living there. Now that's positive externality, and that's your advantage on this board.

Other people cannot find such hit-points in English media in China.

I see you enjoy your freedom of speech.
 
. .
You can, go ahead, give him a hug.

That's your way of debating.

Shouldn't we congratulate him on being honest?

It would be naive that states do not lie, cheat or steal. He seems to have said what's obvious.

But, that's beside the point. What happened to him?

He was criticized, ridiculed, belittled (as much as the vice versa) in his national media and social media.

His party lost elections.

He had to peacefully quit his job in the government, and become a private citizen.

No one got arrested for criticizing him, his party, his boss, the President.

People enjoyed full freedom of speech.

Now, take this case and apply it to any tyranny? Would it be possible?

Now, is it always because governments are so great hence lack of criticism in the media.

Again, you are enjoying freedom of expression provided in the US even though you may not be living there. Now that's positive externality, and that's your advantage on this board.

Other people cannot find such hit-points in English media in China.

I see you enjoy your freedom of speech.

Their pairs in China are having their Weibo/Weixin being closed down.

Their smartphones being checked by the he Party police.

Their teachers' textbooks being inspected by the party committees nestled in departments.

They remain fearful of criticizing even slightly the government.

Yet, the free world is so stupid that they do not see despotic regimes produce smarter youth.

Now, back to the thread topic, you need to consider your efforts to vindicate a certain party by pointing fingers at others' problems thanks to the wealth of information the free media in those countries produce on a daily basis.
 
Last edited:
.
I see you enjoy your freedom of speech.
There is a limit on everything, freedom of speech can mean freedom of lying and rumor mongering which can result in massive deaths and communal violence in some places. I don't believe total freedom of speech in the first place.
Besides, I care more about getting problems fixed rather than criticizing just for being able to criticize but nothing can be fixed. here in China we see problem and public grievances being fixed after people raised their voice, cleaner air, ease of water shortage in north China, better food safety, better health insurance, much lowered price for medication....
But in "free speech" US and India, nothing get fixed, gun crimes, drug problems, homelessness, rundown public infrastructure.....
You can shout about freedom of speed around the clock, but it's just hot air and nothing else.
 
.
There is a limit on everything, freedom of speech can mean freedom of lying and rumor mongering which can result in massive deaths and communal violence in some places. I don't believe total freedom of speech in the first place.
Besides, I care more about getting problems fixed rather than criticizing just for being able to criticize but nothing can be fixed. here in China we see problem and public grievances being fixed after people raised their voice, cleaner air, ease of water shortage in north China, better food safety, better health insurance, much lowered price for medication....
But in "free speech" US and India, nothing get fixed, gun crimes, drug problems, homelessness, rundown public infrastructure.....
You can shout about freedom of speed around the clock, but it's just hot air and nothing else.

Certainly there's a limit to everything. Such as term limits? Do you believe in that? Or should it be limitless? Interestingly, whereas freedom of speech is virtually limitless and hence chaotic in the US, governments are limited.

Besides, don't you believe that there should also be a limit to the lack of freedom of expression or a limit to the state control over the media. Now that you hate limitless things.

Or, should that be limitless, even in your very limited universe?

Not that I like to criticize you for who you are. But, your Western media crusade makes you vulnerable. Otherwise, I believe all societies have advantages and disadvantages.
 
Last edited:
. .
The details are interesting. Guns are not the most common cause of death until age 14, and then there is particular rise in the 15-19 year old demographic, mostly in certain areas, that cause the statistical spike, making for a nice headline, for obvious reasons. It's okay. Most children remain safe, and it is not the parents providing the guns. But let the commiebots hype it up, as usual. :D
exactly! nothing is wrong in Cutipies Heaven!

no mass shootings,no race murders,no war crimes! nothing!
 
.
Certainly there's a limit to everything. Such as term limits? Do you believe in that? Or should it be limitless? Interestingly, whereas freedom of speech is virtually limitless and hence chaotic in the US, governments are limited.

Besides, don't you believe that there should also be a limit to the lack of freedom of expression or a limit to the state control over the media. Now that you hate limitless things.
Who is there to dictate where the limit should stop and where it should stretch? the world police US? Did US reallly listen to its public when it started wars after wars arround the world?

微信图片_20211219123545.png
 
.
no mass shootings,no race murders,no war crimes! nothing!


Where have I said that?

I clearly state: "Guns are not the most common cause of death until age 14, and then there is particular rise in the 15-19 year old demographic, mostly in certain areas, that causes the statistical spike."


Is that too hard for you to understand?
 
.
Who is there to dictate where the limit should stop and where it should stretch? the world police US? Did US reallly listen to its public when it started wars after wars arround the world?

View attachment 902831

Don't sidetrack, as you always do.

So, you deny people a limitless freedom of speech.

But limitless power grab with no end in sight is fine.

You must be re-programmed.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom