LCA tejas fighting fit

[zebra7]

you have any video of JFT firing Bullets?
You have any video of JFT firing LGB's?

Can you Quote the status of IOC/ FOC? parameter for JF-17 IOC / FOC?

let me tell you , Tejas FOC's One parameter is it should have Fuel Probe. / can fire bullets / Can have Beyond Visual A2A and should have LBG's.

Now compare you JF-17, LBG's and Firing bullet and fuel probe parameters

Beta-Fighter you are on fire and firing like the bullets of AK-47.

IOC is the initial operation clearance meaning it is cleared for the doing basic operation and is air worthy certified and pilot could fly safely (not the test pilot). There is no relation of firing the bullets or LGB or BVRAAM parameter. For Tejas IOC was devided into IOC-1 and IOC-2 phase.

FOC means that its certified and all subsytems and weapons are tested, verified and certified and cleared by the OEM that they are working fine and could join the active duty.
Without getting FOC certification the plane could be inducted and could be used for the training the pilots.

Pls note both JF-17 and LCA tejas Mark 1 are in IOC.

 

[majid mehmood]

JF -17 has Max. takeoff weight: 12,500 kg (28,000 lb)

LCA Has Max. takeoff weight: 13,200 kg (29,100 lb)

i wrote about weapons pay load which tejas have 3500 kg while jft has 3800 kg for block 1 and 4000-4500kg for block 2
all block 1 would be brought to block 2 standard in 2017
klj v2 would be there
service ceiling for tejas is 15 km while jft is 16.5 km
as for elta i want links other than wiki and deagel
so u should accept that jft is better
about rcs jft has dsi and 10% ram while jft block 2 incorporate more use of composites
tejas has also low rcs but doesnt have dsi less ram but heavily use of composites so it could be less rcs

 

[zebra7]

i wrote about weapons pay load which tejas have 3500 kg while jft has 3800 kg for block 1 and 4000-4500kg for block 2
all block 1 would be brought to block 2 standard in 2017
klj v2 would be there
service ceiling for tejas is 15 km while jft is 16.5 km
as for elta i want links other than wiki and deagel
so u should accept that jft is better
about rcs jft has dsi and 10% ram while jft block 2 incorporate more use of composites
tejas has also low rcs but doesnt have dsi less ram but heavily use of composites so it could be less rcs

Better in what sense ?? One is for multirole and another one for point defense and COAS.
Google and go to directly ELTA site (no indians ref. required) Can you provide me KLJ v2 site link BTW.

Does DSI makes the plane low RCS ? F-22 Raptor don't have that either
RAM coating --- Tin iridium compound coating/paint does it makes the plane invisible to the radar, DRDO have developed it, I will them know.

You need to study more and get information first before coming to some discussion starting from JF-17 thread and substantially LCA.

 

[cerberus]

i wrote about weapons pay load which tejas have 3500 kg while jft has 3800 kg for block 1 and 4000-4500kg for block 2

3500 Kg is of Weapons Payload of IOC-2 configuration the FOC LCA has payload of 4000 Kg
Block-2 is Still in production yet not operational
JF -17 has Max. takeoff weight: 12,500 kg (28,000 lb)

LCA Has Max. takeoff weight: 13,200 kg (29,100 lb)

JF-17 Block -1 Load is 3,629 kg Kg
Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Kamra - JF-17 Thunder Aircraft

about rcs jft has dsi and 10% ram while jft block 2 incorporate more use of composites

over 65% of the body LCA is of Carbon Fiber & Kevlar composites

RCS of LCA is 2/3 of a Mirage-2000 which has Frontal RCS of 2m2

Better in what sense ?? One is for multirole and another one for point defense and COAS.
Google and go to directly ELTA site (no indians ref. required) Can you provide me KLJ v2 site link BTW.

Does DSI makes the plane low RCS ? F-22 Raptor don't have that either
RAM coating --- Tin iridium compound coating/paint does it makes the plane invisible to the radar, DRDO have developed it, I will them know.

You need to study more and get information first before coming to some discussion starting from JF-17 thread and substantially LCA.

guy is Amatuer Let it be

 

[cerberus]

Can you pls tell me what is the rate of climb of tejas & jf17. I tried to Google it but failed.

Well Climb Rate of Jf-17 is 249 m/s with TWR of 0.94
JF-17 perfectly suited for low-mid level combat, and slightly less suited to high altitude

LCA . Its Climb rate More than 255 m/s with TWR of 0.98
LCA is Suited to Mid-high Altitude Combat Slightly Less For Low Level

 

[volatile]

Quantity has its own quality.

Quantity with amount of numbers you can build plus ease of operation and availability

What a magnificent brain fart. Care to elaborate what is 3rd generation in JF-17 ? you are seriously ignorant about the recent JF-17 updates. By all means continue to live in ignorant land

Chinese 3rd Gen is 4th Gen West ,may be he is quoting on this

 

[Assange]

LCA might not be the answer for IAF's questions....

But yes HAL has created something now they have to find out what is lacking in their design and should rectify it in their future design....

I feel something odd because whenever India invents something in the defense field everyone just points out to its negativity no one appreciates the people who created it....I feel the PR industry of global weapons industry is at work here to keep India dependent on their weapons....

 

[indiatester]

I do.

HAL

You work at HAL? Which one?

 

[majid mehmood]

3500 Kg is of Weapons Payload of IOC-2 configuration the FOC LCA has payload of 4000 Kg
Block-2 is Still in production yet not operational
JF -17 has Max. takeoff weight: 12,500 kg (28,000 lb)

LCA Has Max. takeoff weight: 13,200 kg (29,100 lb)

JF-17 Block -1 Load is 3,629 kg Kg
Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Kamra - JF-17 Thunder Aircraft
over 65% of the body LCA is of Carbon Fiber & Kevlar composites

the pac website has not updated from 2010
even lca foc will have 3500 kg because it is mark 1

http://www.tejas.gov.in/ADA-Tejas Brochure-2015.pdf
it is a 2014 brouchure and payload is 3500 kg
max take off weight is 9800 kg
please give me solid proof about it can take 13500 kg
jft has good fuel economy so has to carry less fuel than tejas while ge 404 consumme more

 

[cerberus]

the pac website has not updated from 2010
even lca foc will have 3500 kg because it is mark 1

http://www.tejas.gov.in/ADA-Tejas Brochure-2015.pdf
it is a 2014 brouchure and payload is 3500 kg
max take off weight is 9800 kg
please give me solid proof about it can take 13500 kg
jft has good fuel economy so has to carry less fuel than tejas while ge 404 consumme more

Kid The 9800 kg is loaded weight with clean configuration

Same is of JF-17 which has 9100 Kg of love Loaded weight with clean configuration

The maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) or maximum gross takeoff weight (MGTOW) or maximum takeoff mass (MTOM) of anaircraft is the maximum weight at which thepilot is allowed to attempt to take off, due to structural or other limits. The analogous term for rockets is gross lift-off mass, or GLOW. MTOW is usually specified in units of kilograms or pounds.

Maximum takeoff weight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[cerberus]

the pac website has not updated from 2010
even lca foc will have 3500 kg because it is mark 1

http://www.tejas.gov.in/ADA-Tejas Brochure-2015.pdf
it is a 2014 brouchure and payload is 3500 kg
max take off weight is 9800 kg
please give me solid proof about it can take 13500 kg
jft has good fuel economy so has to carry less fuel than tejas while ge 404 consumme more

Kid The 9800 kg is loaded weight with clean configuration

Same is of JF-17 which has 9100 Kg of love Loaded weight with clean configuration

The maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) or maximum gross takeoff weight (MGTOW) or maximum takeoff mass (MTOM) of anaircraft is the maximum weight at which thepilot is allowed to attempt to take off, due to structural or other limits. The analogous term for rockets is gross lift-off mass, or GLOW. MTOW is usually specified in units of kilograms or pounds.

Maximum takeoff weight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia