Land Forces Weapons for Export

[shuttler]

Many brainwashed people are still sleeping with western hogs regardless of their look! That is pathetic to the core having no clue of what the priorities for procurement are and to talk aesthetics without sense of aesthetics themselves are more pathetic!

If Chinese or Russian designed hardware are so bad as to dispel buyers, how come they have become 5th and 2nd largest military exporters of the world! Get a fhugging commonsense to begin with!

 

[Beidou2020]

chinese and russian products are fugly, because they are mostly designed by engineers with little artistic ability.
in the west, they use industrial designers to come up with ideas and concepts, then their engineers and scientists help to make those concepts a reality using their maths and science knowledge.
chinese universities should include 1 year industrial design a compulsory in all engineering degree courses, so that students don't just only know how to crunch numbers.. lol

Its ugly because its designed by useless state-owned companies. SOEs are never as good as private companies. Private companies actually care about profit and making a product that will sell. This is why American weapons look so badass. This is why American weapons are technologically far superior and why countries like India are now buying American weapons instead of Russia weapons so they can close the technology gap with China.

 

[cnleio]

Now they looks good or ugly ?

I think the best look land weapon made in China, is ZTZ99A2 MBT but we won't export it.

As for weapon production, the best choise is the price cost down↓, cost down↓... or no nation can join the war.

 

[Martian2]

Serious military enthusiasts focus on performance, not subjective looks

A quick comment to the newbies on this forum.

Lay people focus on subjective looks.

Serious military enthusiasts focus on military specifications. If you want to compare range or a specific performance parameter, go right ahead. I'm all ears.

Do us all a favor and refrain from commenting on ridiculous "looks." The first Chinese 3.3-megaton hydrogen bomb looked like a fat bomb. So what? It delivered 3.3 MEGATONS of firepower.

 

[Kompromat]

Any update on MBT-3000?

 

[Akasa]

Any update on MBT-3000?

Still offered for export, possibly a domestic induction might happen in 2014...

 

[Kompromat]

Still offered for export, possibly a domestic induction might happen in 2014...

I haven't seen any new prototypes or pictures.

 

[Zarvan]

I haven't seen any new prototypes or pictures.

According to @cirr this is MBT-3000

 

[Akasa]

I haven't seen any new prototypes or pictures.

That would be the photo of the tank in this thread, the very first post.

 

[Kompromat]

That would be the photo of the tank in this thread, the very first post.

I said no new photos etc.

 

[Akasa]

I said no new photos etc.

That is the new photo.

 

[cirr]

I said no new photos etc.

MBT-3000 ammos(38+22 in the autoloader)
（1）Gun launched missile with an effective range of 5km
（2）Fin stabilized APDS
（3）HEAT
（4）HE

 

[Kompromat]

MBT-3000 ammos(38+22 in the autoloader)
（1）Gun launched missile with an effective range of 5km
（2）Fin stabilized APDS
（3）HEAT
（4）HE

What about armor?

AK-II will have 49 rounds in total.

 

[cirr]

What about armor?

AK-II will have 49 rounds in total.

Indigenous 1200HP/1500HP（option）twin turbo engine、72km/h top speed、500km max range at 48km/h、2nd generation thermal imaging、partial hydropneumatic suspension chassis，indigenous stepless hydraulic transmission gear box、360-degree turn in situ。。。

 

[Akasa]

Are any of the below systems in service?
-SY400 MRL
-WS2 MRL
-SR5 MRL
-BP12A SRBM
-B611M SRBM
-SH1 SPH
-PLZ52 SPH