What's new

Land Forces Weapons for Export

125mm tank ammo
173223bkldebgbzvblecxa.jpg




155mm SPH ammo
173357dn6llpnr9laof946.jpg




122mm SPH ammo
173516njzbqbbbmrpaj1tx.jpg




Other ammo/bombs
173553y2zsweyce3370sj0.jpg


YiTian short-range air-defense system
231347eq0t1l4fib20r2vz.jpg




TianLong medium-range air-defense system
231619dhny2pnyp0f0jxh8.jpg




AF902 air-defense system
231702p9ezj2yyy6zoediy.jpg

231826b113ju37jj39nujh.jpg




AF902A air-defense system
231906hvoajebr2gogwzex.jpg



Land Shield-2000 CIWS
232014mi02w2wib5l02cac.jpg
 
Last edited:
Some of those designs look very cheap. Typical of state-owned products. The American weapons just look so smooth and real with a lot of style. State-owned companies don't have the ability to make products with style and smoothness. They are too rugged.

Cheap weapon systems arent necessarily bad but I agree that the Chinese need to work on the aesthetics of some of their weapons, especially for export. The Sh1 artillery is especially ugly. Oh so ugly. Makes me cringe.
 
Cheap weapon systems arent necessarily bad but I agree that the Chinese need to work on the aesthetics of some of their weapons, especially for export. The Sh1 artillery is especially ugly. Oh so ugly. Makes me cringe.

The ugly look makes it look cheap and technologically inferior.
 
The ugly look makes it look cheap and technologically inferior.
In military market,things work differently. Its useless to make those things nice and it still cannot work well.

Making thing look nice cost money too and unnecessary bring up the cost of its product. China military product still needs to win deal mostly based on lower cost but better operation than peer product. All this will put cosmetic appearance the last criteria.
 
In military market,things work differently. Its useless to make those things nice and it still cannot work well.

Making thing look nice cost money too and unnecessary bring up the cost of its product. China military product still needs to win deal mostly based on lower cost but better operation than peer product. All this will put cosmetic appearance the last criteria.

People buy on look too. If it looks cheap, it probably doesn't work properly.
 
boeing-bell-v22-osprey.jpg

credit: hightech-edge.com

Osprey looks very ugly
Does it sell?

One of the worst looking guns in the world but a top seller

Ak47-e1363724603451.png


credit: dailycaller.com

One fcuking ugly jet to have ever been designed
many yankies are crying for its retirement not due to its look


warthog4_s640x427.jpg

Credit: washingtontimes.com

640_a-10.jpg

credit: eandt.theiet.org

Its nicknamed Warthog

Warthog2.jpg

Credit: thelife-animal.blogspot.com

A display of several howitzers designed and made in usa - uglier than shit but all are sold very well overseas (Those designed and made by other countries are stated )

Source: wikipedia

800px-Artillery_Corps_Fires_Practice_Cannon3.jpg

M109 howitzer

800px-M55_8_inch_Self-Propelled_Howitzer_3.JPG

M55_8_inch_Self-Propelled_Howitzer

800px-203mm_Self-Propelled_Howitzer_M110A2.JPG

8 inch (203 mm) Self-Propelled Howitzer M110

800px-M37_SPH.jpg

M37 105 mm howitzer

Germany
Panzerhaubitze 2000
PzH2000_houwitser.png
 
Last edited:
In military market,things work differently. Its useless to make those things nice and it still cannot work well.

Making thing look nice cost money too and unnecessary bring up the cost of its product. China military product still needs to win deal mostly based on lower cost but better operation than peer product. All this will put cosmetic appearance the last criteria.


For domestic use, it doesn't matter how it looks provided that it performs. But selling the arms to foreigners, there must be an attempt to appear modern and respectable. Seriously, how much can it cost to streamline the shape - its just panels of steel.
The SH1 looks so bad it hurts. It would be a shame it loses sales because of how it looks.
 
A display of several howitzers designed and made in usa - uglier than shit but all are sold very well overseas (Those designed and made by other countries are stated )

Source: wikipedia

800px-Artillery_Corps_Fires_Practice_Cannon3.jpg

M109 howitzer

800px-M55_8_inch_Self-Propelled_Howitzer_3.JPG

M55_8_inch_Self-Propelled_Howitzer

800px-203mm_Self-Propelled_Howitzer_M110A2.JPG

8 inch (203 mm) Self-Propelled Howitzer M110

800px-M37_SPH.jpg

M37 105 mm howitzer

Germany
Panzerhaubitze 2000
PzH2000_houwitser.png

Some more uglier than shits and exports:

France
GCT 155mm

800px-AuF1_of_Saudi_Arabia.JPEG


France Caesar

800px-CAESAR-openphotonet_PICT6026.JPG


Russia 2S19 Msta

800px-Msta-S_-_TankBiathlon2013-26.jpg


Israel
Atmos 2000
800px-Atmos_2000.jpg
 
Red Arrow-8 anti-tank missile system
171938gmg2o2zqz2pqoi8o.jpg

Here is older version of HJ-8L launcher and the optics module is far larger. That smaller optic system is probably more robust and is less prone to damage in combat environment.
PtVjRR1.jpg
 
chinese and russian products are fugly, because they are mostly designed by engineers with little artistic ability.
in the west, they use industrial designers to come up with ideas and concepts, then their engineers and scientists help to make those concepts a reality using their maths and science knowledge.
chinese universities should include 1 year industrial design a compulsory in all engineering degree courses, so that students don't just only know how to crunch numbers.. lol
 
People buy on look too. If it looks cheap, it probably doesn't work properly.
You are wrong on this part. Military weapon are purchased based on country relation, weapon effectiveness based on test field result. Price is also one big factor. If a minister approved a military deal based on look. He will be the biggest idiot.
 
Back
Top Bottom