What's new

Kuwait ‘gay-o-meter’? Clinical screenings to ‘detect’ and ban homosexuals

.
the pot calling the kettle black :omghaha:

First, learn how to write and then we can debate on grammar :rofl: ...
Dafuq?

Its still not too late to take some grammar classes...

1-Reported statement: Arab logic at its best = Similar to what Some Indians do.
2-Responsive statement Arab logic at its best = Not far from SOME Indians do.

So, the word NOT here is being used as an agent linked to the original statement being responded to which is Arab logic at its best.

I hold a B.A. & an M.A in Translation my dear boy. Don't you ever think for a second that someone like yourself is going to intimidate me out of nowhere, let alone in the web.
 
. .
Haha the guy goes on to make excuses about his grammar fail. Classic!

With all due respect, but the very least thing I would make an excuse for is to someone on the web. It isn't my fault that you can't take someone picking on your fellow countrymen, if there is anything you would put the blame on then it has got to be your poor attitude, and racist behavior.
 
.
the pot calling the kettle black :omghaha:

First, learn how to write and then we can debate on grammar :rofl: ...


1-Reported statement: Arab logic at its best = Similar to what Some Indians do.
2-Responsive statement Arab logic at its best = Not far from SOME Indians do.

So, the word NOT here is being used as an agent linked to the original statement being responded to which is Arab logic at its best.

I hold a B.A. & an M.A in Translation my dear boy. Don't you ever think for a second that someone like yourself is going to intimidate me out of nowhere, let alone in the web.

Internet thug life aside, the closest thing that sounds grammatically correct to what you said is:

Not far from what some Indians do

What you wrote is 100% wrong grammatically.

Anyways silly debate, moving on.
 
.
Internet thug life aside, the closest thing that sounds grammatically correct to what you said is:

Not far from what some Indians do

What you wrote is 100% wrong grammatically.

Anyways silly debate, moving on.

No, not in responsive statments, omitting what may not be false but semantically sound. Feel free to hold the stick from wherever you like though :wave:
 
.
No, not in responsive statments.

Well you are wrong, again, for the 355766847th time.

Feel free to hold the stick from wherever you like though

Is that supposed to be some kind of immature "diss", kinda like your immature behavior of not admitting your mistake in grammar. How old are you kid? 12?
 
.
@Yzd Khalifa Brother don't waste your time with this troll, look at his Nick, its (grandtiger) i mean the guy who don't even know about some thing called "Capital Letters" talks about the grammar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
With all due respect, but the very least thing I would make an excuse for is to someone on the web. It isn't my fault that you can't take someone picking on your fellow countrymen, if there is anything you would put the blame on, then it would have (not 'has got') to be your poor attitude, and racist behavior.

With all due respect, I don't give a rat's backside about what you have to say about Indian people, 'cause quite frankly, your opinion does not matter, and not everybody's perfect. Your response was not only completely off, but also hard to decipher (as is the part in bold in your post I've quoted). Now, coming to your response - what is it supposed to mean? "Not far from SOME Indians do? Do you mean some Indians are gay? Of course some are, just like some people from every other nationality/ethnicity on the planet are, and the "phenomenon" is as natural as you, I, or anyone else, having sex with a woman. You'd be fooling yourself if you thought otherwise. Blame? What? Were? What the heck are you on about? Hahaha


1-Reported statement: Arab logic at its best = Similar to what Some Indians do.
2-Responsive statement Arab logic at its best = Not far from what SOME Indians do.

^^there, fixed it for you. :)


P.S: even if your statement were grammatically correct, and easy to decipher at the first instance, it still doesn't make complete sense.
 
.
Yeah India has no problem with the Gay community their leader was Gay too :D

oh I did NOT mean that.

Another pathetic attempt by the so-called "journalist" to drop her measly 2 paise wherever she can. Get a proper education, you. :lol:

:what: what was there to take education or even anything to do with two paisa or ten paisas??
 
.
Well you are wrong, again, for the 355766847th time.



Is that supposed to be some kind of immature "diss", kinda like your immature behavior of not admitting your mistake in grammar. How old are you kid? 12?

:D forgive him for the mistake. They were not colonized by Brits like you and me .
 
. . . .
^^there, fixed it for you. :)


P.S: even if your statement were grammatically correct, and easy to decipher at the first instance, it still doesn't make complete sense.


I've already dissected the blueprints to your friend. :)

As for the rest of your post, I chose to drop the stick here by now as I happen to have aplenty of good Indian friends of mine. One incidents shall not affect my judgment on Indians in general.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom