When did I say Bongs are are responsible for easy come and go between borders ?
How is this even relevant ?
The preventive action is when political parties do not pander to ISI agents and provide them cover.
Where did I say it does not happen elsewhere ?
It is YOU who wants to adopt the aadharsh Liberal attitude of dragging in everybody else in an article about ISI Agents CAUGHT IN BENGAL
I work in the defence sector so I have a pretty good understand of how it works. I am certain it is much better than your theoretical models.
No one is expecting Trinamool to weed out moles, the whole argument was about Trinamool weeding out "minority appeasement" and "jihadi appeasement" which leads you to pander to criminals and anti nationals who then go on to support the ISI as the news has so readily demonstrated.
No amount of obfuscating this reality can work. Nor can strawmen which you are trying to build and demolish give you any moral victory here.
BD because I mentioned BSF, not to mention that the ISI agent mentioned frequent travel of BD made possible by a blooming industry in W.B than support such activity.
Such a boring fella you are. Can't even remember what you wrote a few minutes earlier. The entire incident is not even closely related to 'Muslim appeasement' or Jihadi appeasement. The Burdwan blast has been probed by NIA which I assume to be a quite competent authority to conduct such investigation. And nothing as sort has been found that it was TMC that was unofficially harboring the Jamaat militant wing. Nor in this case, there was no appeasement policy working here in appointing a Muslim as a party member, or is it how any political organisation works in this country? Your entire lecture that Bengal needs a course correction for 1. the culprit getting an ID 2. Bengal's porous border 3. Appeasement politics is nothing but lame rant.