What's new

Khilji, the first Afghan dyansty of Hindostan

look at group pictures of Pakistani Punjabis and group pictures of Sikhs all of you know who are jatts nd who are chamar..if Pakistanis ancestors converted to islam one day doest mean that changed their identity of being low casts.

Let the truth be told

Coward hindus got converted to muslims under sword

And sikhs got converted from hindus just to fight the muslims.

As u can see,u guys occupy the bottom pool of subcontinent.
 
Indians were probably better off at our Turkic boot.

I saw documentary of India last day, omfg, it looked like a turd world country. Garbage and grossness all over the place. They don't even clean their holy places.

That is what you expect if you pray to a cow.


Atatwat

Why are Turks considered as culture less barbarians, worldwide?

Turks have zero contribution towards science, literature or mathematics. Why?
 
Sigh - I am an Indian - at least try and understand the context before typing away.



Oh I don't know - probably because it is not considered fun? You think?

Sorry yaar
It was for the one whose comment u quoted:eek:
 
All Indians have Central Asian origin as it was one of the migration routes of Ancestral North Indians. About 40000 years ago, people from Central Asia settled and interbred with another Indian population which had arrived in India around 65000 years back. They have interbred ever since till it stopped about 2000 years ago on account of the caste system getting rigid.

Hence, the bottomline is, any Indian with ANI genes had forefathers from Central Asia, and all Indians have ANI genes.

Question is, Are Central Asians from 40000 years ago the same as Central Asians now.

You are going back 60.000 years. Brahmins are recent migrants thats why they have less asi ancestry, because of caste system also.

And ASI-ANI admixture is only 1900-4200 years old, not 40.000. In Pakistan its only 2000 years old and in North India 2500 years and in South 4200 years old according to latest genetic study.

So the theory of 40.000 old mixture has been proven wrong.
 
Let the truth be told

Coward hindus got converted to muslims under sword

And sikhs got converted from hindus just to fight the muslims.

As u can see,u guys occupy the bottom pool of subcontinent.

probably that's why Pakistani made world record in surrendering..and loose matches in pressure situation like today match. they don't have it in them
 
that's futile for you as I said our identity from Bharat varsha existed since eternity unlike the confused people the East and West of Indus.

Not since before the Indus Valley Civilisation, which by the way was a civilisation of people based "East and West of the Indus valley".
 
probably that's why Pakistani made world record in surrendering..and loose matches in pressure situation like today match. they don't have it in them

They can't disagree on facts,can they?

93000 meekly surrendered
 
Sikh religion was started so chura hindus would not be discriminated against. That's why sikhs consist entirely of churas and chamars.
 
They are Pakistanis because of a common religion, the Pashtuns-Baloch of Pakistan see Punjabi-Sindhi Muslims as Indian by race and only find the common religion which connects them and nothing else.

Yes you're right! One little mistake: "India" and "Indian" never were an ethnic group. It's a term denoting a geographical region after which a political entity is named after.
EDIT: and that geographic region itself is named after a river.
 
Sikh religion was started so chura hindus would not be discriminated against. That's why sikhs consist entirely of churas and chamars.

And ur forefather had no balls to stand up to invader and got converted.

Ja ro baith ke kone ch hun
 
Not since before the Indus Valley Civilisation, which by the way was a civilisation of people based "East and West of the Indus valley".

East is Punjabi-Sindhi, West is Pashtun-Baloch. Yes, it was since Vedic culture, not IVC but still its very very ancient.
 
Let the truth be told

Coward hindus got converted to muslims under sword

And sikhs got converted from hindus just to fight the muslims.

As u can see,u guys occupy the bottom pool of subcontinent.

Sikhs have reduced to jokes in Hindu india. After 84 sikh genocide by hindus now days the only thing they do is tell the world how tall they are compared to tamil hindu. Jatt+gutts have similar complex, developed after being slaves yet again. One operation was needed to kill rightfull and valid claims of sikhs.

All sikhs demanded was protection of their faith ad culture, the result now is poorbias from bihar and up have invaded punjab.
 
People need to stop trolling. Let's have a civilized discussion without name calling, shall we?
 
Pakistan can choose the heroes it wants to from history. They have picked Ghauri and Aurangzeb. Picking Khilji is not a surprise. In the long run, it will only lead to a more fractured Pakistani society - the chasm between the liberals and the conservatives will only increase. Pick heroes because they inspire you - not because they happen to appeal the idea of them being anti-India.
 
You are going back 60.000 years. Brahmins are recent migrants thats why they have less asi ancestry, because of caste system also.

And ASI-ANI admixture is only 1900-4200 years old, not 40.000. In Pakistan its only 2000 years old and in North India 2500 years and in South 4200 years old according to latest genetic study.

So the theory of 40.000 old mixture has been proven wrong.

Any references on how and where the theory has been proven wrong?

Even the most remote tribes in South India have ANI genes, which obviously hasn't taken place in the last 2000 years. The ANI genepool has had a number of additions over the centuries. But it's virtually impossible for the so-called Aryan tribes to have arrived in India and propagated their genes into every Indian population in just 3-4 thousand years. The interbreeding has a 40000 year timeline, not 2000-4000, even in regions that comprise modern-day Pakistan.
 
Back
Top Bottom