What's new

Khalistan?

its a reality... they are many nations living in sub continent.. modi was forced to speech in local or english but not in hindi, in south india.. so here 'national' identity is an issue not joke..

lol, modi gives speeches in hindi while he is in south India.. there will be a translator to translate his speech... the same is the case with mms and sonia...
 
Hi all

I was thinking is it possible to allow a semi independent small state of Khalustan, in Pakistan. Examples are Vetican city or Monaco.

Its just bcz Sikh is a separate nation and with Huge numbers but with no 'national' identity. However, Sikhs's dreamland home include both pujab, haryana and jammu.. which will abstain us, mainly, any opportunity to give them a thought/seed of separate homeland...

Your thoughts..
(editing bcz I have over estimated that all members would know about small and enclave semi independent states all over the world) Pakistan will given nothing to anybody. Its just like giving Pakistani sikhs to control their Holy land of Nankana more according to their beliefs. (considering muslims live their too).. Have you forgotten State of Bhawalpur, which formally entered in Pakistan in 56 i think...so a solution like that
i think perhaps like allowing sikhs a small city of their own in pakistan would be good. letting them have their own laws ect. but they would have to use pakistani passports and we would provide security...
and it can be a base for sikhs to unite and get khalistan from india.
 
Lahore lahore aye!
it belongs to Pakistan.. any one welcome to visit and thru a process if someone wish to get Pakistani citizenship and wants to live in Lahore they are more than welcome.. but giving away a inch to anyone is out of context.. they can get their seprate land we support them as hindu did it in Bangladesh since their claim was it was indigenious movment.. so we have all the right to support indigenious movment as they did...
we can live how Us and Canada lives together can travel either way on ID.
 
Sikhs to get a separate homeland, typical separatist
though that moment had differnet palyers involved also.. listen S.Swami about russian interests in that.. though this "Khalistan" I am talking about a small city like semi independent state...like pricely states but with less autonomy

lol, modi gives speeches in hindi while he is in south India.. there will be a translator to translate his speech... the same is the case with mms and sonia...
so its not a nation then by definition... I mean if langauge is way different then what is left.. India is technically like EU, with one central government of different nations... like Rajhistani, Gujrati, Bengali, Punjabi, etc

and it can be a base for sikhs to unite and get khalistan from india.
i have no that far stretched intentions but rest u said is my point....
 
i think perhaps like allowing sikhs a small city of their own in pakistan would be good. letting them have their own laws ect. but they would have to use pakistani passports and we would provide security...
and it can be a base for sikhs to unite and get khalistan from india.
:) bas kerday yaar... sikhon ko bolnay day...
 
Pakistanis so concerned about Sikhs of India while conveniently forgetting (or not knowing perhaps) the amount of goodwill Sikhs enjoy in this country, how economically powerful they are and what are their contribution to institutions like defense etc. Truly amusing to say the least :lol:
 
though that moment had differnet palyers involved also.. listen S.Swami about russian interests in that.. though this "Khalistan" I am talking about a small city like semi independent state...like pricely states but with less autonomy

If that's how it starts, where will it end ? Did you think about that ? Today, they are happy with semi-autonomous state, tomorrow they want full autonomy. Today it's only Lahore and tomorrow, it's entire Punjab that they want. :lol:

So, no.. bad idea..Such ideas, that is dividing land and authority on the basis of religion has already divided the subcontinent more than once, has already created so big problems that we are still dealing with. Why create any more such problem ? What is there to gain ? No return on investment :D
 
Why should we be concerned about what happens to sikhs in India the sikhs jhutas murdered millions of muslims during partition
 
I was thinking is it possible to allow a semi independent small state of Khalustan, in Pakistan. Examples are Vetican city or Monaco.

I cannot think of a better idea to break up your nation than this. Please go ahead.

This will set a wonderful precedent for the Baluch, Sindhi, KP , GB to seek similar status. RAW will have to shift its office for it will need more space to open a few more ' desks' in their office .

Please give us some notice so that land can be identified for a new office building.
 
So, no.. bad idea..Such ideas, that is dividing land and authority on the basis of religion has already divided the subcontinent more than once, has already created so big problems that we are still dealing with. Why create any more such problem ? What is there to gain ? No return on investmen
I know stakes are very high...

Why should we be concerned about what happens to sikhs in India the sikhs jhutas murdered millions of muslims during partition
bcz they are a reality, human beings, part of jammu etc etc...
 
bcz they are a reality, human beings, part of jammu etc etc...
I dont give a flying,swimming,sub atomic or intergalatic f they are not our problem even if india burn them on hot coals and feed their bits to fished it should not be our problem
 
Meanwhile....


200,000 Hindus and Sikh refugees from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan currently living in India.


The changes in the Citizenship Act that ensure faster disposal of citizenship requests have the potential to open up the floodgates, swelling the number of those (Sikh and Hindu refugees from pakistan, afghanistan and bangladesh) eventually allowed to be permanently based in India to around
10 lakhs by December 2016.



557e286b82264.jpg



17cfa18ef2d52b2427e640131d2b769a.jpg


Over 4,000 Hindus and Sikhs from Pakistan and Afghanistan granted Indian citizenship - The Express Tribune

 
I cannot think of a better idea to break up your nation than this. Please go ahead.

This will set a wonderful precedent for the Baluch, Sindhi, KP , GB to seek similar status. RAW will have to shift its office for it will need more space to open a few more ' desks' in their office .

Please give us some notice so that land can be identified for a new office building.
i think thats a major hurdle besides Sikhs might grow thr ambitions of greater punjab etc.... though the rest ethnicity have also deep attachment to their roots but not facing identity issues.. yes they have legitimate rights which some how neglected by politicians..rest they have no intentions of separate homeland as neither they had it in past... not sindh, not KP.. however Balochistan had cluster of small states (pricley like) under leadership of Khan of Qallat..
 
so its not a nation then by definition... I mean if langauge is way different then what is left.. India is technically like EU, with one central government of different nations... like Rajhistani, Gujrati, Bengali, Punjabi, etc

First things first, stop defining India by taking a country or eu as a referrence.. we are special in our own way.. A nation's definition is not limited to jst common language, history, descent and culture are among other things. The constitution of India follows a bilingual approach were both hindi and english are given official status. there are more than 30 languages in India spoken by more than a million people and more than 130 languages spoken by more than 10,000 people, adding to this countless dialects for each of these specific languages.
 
200,000 Hindus and Sikh refugees from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan currently living in India.
some migrated bcz of TTP... anyway Muslims also suffered in the hands of those vicious hounds..howverm number remained near one thousand... not much
 
Back
Top Bottom