Khalistan Movement Gains Momentum as Registration Starts Today

[GumNaam]

Again please have a look at the difference between region and a country. A person from romania is european and an irish is also european. Doesn't make them from one nation.

Do you have any evidence of some sort of central governing body ruling current Pakistan+india+bangladesh of that ideological geographical india?

if you study history very carefully, you will realize that one of the fundamental differences between indians and others would be that an irish trader would identify himself as an irishman, a trader from venice would identify himself as a venusian, same with french, russian, heck even the Chinese...but from south asia, regardless of which kingdom or princely state a trader was from, he would always identify himself as a hindustani, not a marashtran or meysoori, etc what have you.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Again please have a look at the difference between region and a country. A person from romania is european and an irish is also european. Doesn't make them from one nation.

Do you have any evidence of some sort of central governing body ruling current Pakistan+india+bangladesh of that ideological geographical india?

Do you have ANY evidence they didn't?.......

 

[Ace of Spades]

Do you have ANY evidence they didn't?.......

Empires ruled at certain point in time with varying geographical extent but never under the banner of Indian identity. Just to prove the wrong point please don't group subcontinent region under indianism.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Empires ruled at certain point in time with varying geographical extent but never under the banner of Indian identity. Just to prove the wrong point please don't group subcontinent region under indianism.

So which of those empires decides what constitutes as "real" indian history or the legacy of an undivided, "united" india? Who has the prerogative and right to say so and why?

 

[Ace of Spades]

So which of those empires decides what constitutes as "real" indian history or the legacy of an undivided, "united" india? Who has the prerogative and right to say so and why?

None of them; they were empires of rulers from certain regions/outsiders. There is no real "indian history" as a "collective indian history".

India what she claims today; is claiming stolen history of other adjacent regions of today's India, if not all still quite much of it...

Indian state is nothing but an artificial construct with ideology wrapped under ambiguous statements and gross paint brushing of regional history. Artificial state, artificial construct and fake history.

 

[FuturePAF]

whole india in one .no wastage of water .

As long as you let the people know the water is going into the desert without an effective plan to use the water. When upstream farmers (Sikh or otherwise) realize water is being wasted in such a way, well ...

p.s. watch the video before making a rhetorical point

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

If you consider after independence i.e from 1947, then no we have only added more territory to our union.
But in historical context, we have lost more than 50% territory.
We can consider everything from Afghanistan to Burma in the India empire (erstwhile).
We can in theory claim Central Asia, some parts of Iran, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia and some parts of Indonesia (thanks to chola empire)

Did you learn your history in RSS training camps. You must be out of your mind or just extremiest.
India was not india before british came it was hindustan or British india moslty it was called bar e saghir and it was never united under one rule s india is just an artificial state which might not last if war broke out one last time.
Better for you realize that Kashmir is not india if you want to extend this artificial unions life.

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

KHALISTAN MOVEMENT GAINING MOMENTUM.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Serves the sikhs right for what they did to 1 million innocent Pakistanis in August 1947.

Didn't Pakistanis also kill over 1 million Sikhs in 1947?

- PRTP GWD

 

[WinterFangs]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1519976281265553408

https://twitter.com/x/status/1519983993793437697

https://twitter.com/x/status/1520015908139241473

 

[cloud4000]

Ah, yes. Another thread on Khalistan in PDF, as if there's ever a chance of that happening.

1. Kalistan can be created. No problem...just not in India. I hear Canada is nice.
2. The most rabid supporters of Khalistan live overseas in exile. The only thing they can do is conduct non-binding referendum that has no influence whatsoever.
3. If there's Khalistan, it will also incorporate Pakistani territory, so be careful what you ask for.
4. There's no love for Pakistan among Sikha. During Partition, they made their decision when they chose to migrate to India.
5. Pakistan does not care about the Sikhs whatsoever except for the interest of hurting India.
6. Pakistan continues to underestimate the resilience of India. Still incredible, even to me, the country has survived given its heterogenous population.

That is all...