Kashmir was never an integral part of India

[Indika]

If miss roy is paid for air fare,food, accommodation @5star hotel, good moolah and an oppurtunity for catwalk at seminars with her boyfriends she will sell the moon to the sponsor.

 

[pakdefender]

Kashmir neither was nor is "integral" part of india

 

[Centurion2016]

All of us will leave this earth.

Kashmir will still be in India,

It will not change in your life times

I'm sorry

 

[danger007]

No. Under indian occupation yes. Part of...no.
If indians are certain then they should pull their forces and see how long it takes for Kashmir to declare indpendence.

All the best.

and it is part of India... Recently India conducted elections... not Pakistan... stop pretending guys... why don't you accept war is for water resources.. there are elements backed by Pak, obviously Pak lurking around kashmir ...during winter once we pulled back our forces in kargil but Pak did big mistake by occupying empty posts... now or never..

 

[Mangus Ortus Novem]

and it is part of India... Recently India conducted elections... not Pakistan... stop pretending guys... why don't you accept war is for water resources.. there are elements backed by Pak, obviously Pak lurking around kashmir ...during winter once we pulled back our forces in kargil but Pak did big mistake by occupying empty posts... now or never..

Kind sir, thank you for your reply and stating your view point.

Were election free and fair?

Were there international monitors?

Instead engaging in the war of words here...which would results in denegration...let us part ways...

Let us see what the momentum of life has to say...

Once upon a time your good country was occupied by external invaders.. in the end momentum of life saw you gain independence ...

Momentum of life always takes it course... that is how the universe works.

 

[Sneaker]

Almost clicked the link, then saw arundhati... ooof..saved my eyes from reading load of BS

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

I dont understand. Kashmir has been a place for hinduism since centuries. People convert for a variety of reasons. There was even a period of forced conversion in Kashmir. People also converted voluntarily. So does this mean people are not part of Bharat?
So IVC is not part of Pakistan just cos people converted to Islam? Its the people who make the country. Not religion. Pakistan has started this religious poison in this world, and it will be consumed by it, sooner or later.

 

[Joe Shearer]

No. Under indian occupation yes. Part of...no.
If indians are certain then they should pull out all their forces and see how long it takes for Kashmir to declare indpendence.

All the best.

Interesting.

Would you do the same in Tibet? And in Xinjiang?

All the best.

 

[ssethii]

Interesting.

Would you do the same in Tibet? And in Xinjiang?

All the best.

Wouldn't that make India the second biggest democracy. just saying.

 

[scionoftheindus]

There was a time when people took seriously what see wrote, not anymore.

The article he pasted was from 2010...too old

 

[noksss]

http://m.thehindu.com/news/national...ral-part-of-india-arundhati/article847323.ece

 

[Post Colonnial]

Pakistani bubbles unfortunately and as usual burst again. This piece from Arundhathi Roy has been picked up from 2010. It has been roundly disproven a thousand times since then.

Politically, historically, culturally - whichever way you see it, Kashmir is India, has always been and will always be.

But one thing I have noticed is that whenever Pakistan rachet up about Kashmit it is has been an indication that the tensions between military and civilian agencies of Pakistan have intensified; in order to deflect and distract the gullible Pakistani public, they start blabbering about India, Hindus, Kashmir etc, And again in a few months this bubble bursts and if the tensions still persists there is usually a coup.

Let us is if Gen.Raheel does the same thing that his predecessors have done and capture Pakistan

 

[Joe Shearer]

Wouldn't that make India the second biggest democracy. just saying.

Sorry, I am feeling stupider than usual (and that's pretty stupid, as you have pointed out from time to time). Would you like to send me a dumbed-down version? Why would an act by an undemocratic Communist tyranny make India the biggest, or the second biggest, or the third biggest democracy? Why would such an act affect the adjective attached to the size of Indian democracy at all?

Please earn merit and help your intellectually handicapped fellow human being.

Kind sir, thank you for your reply and stating your view point.

Were election free and fair?

Were there international monitors?

Instead engaging in the war of words here...which would results in denegration...let us part ways...

Let us see what the momentum of life has to say...

Once upon a time your good country was occupied by external invaders.. in the end momentum of life saw you gain independence ...

Momentum of life always takes it course... that is how the universe works.

I agree, we should not enter into a war of words. Let us count the ways not to do so.

• We should not ask about elections, which were held, if we do not hold them ourselves;
• We should not ask about their being free and fair, when we look at it from the point of view of a single party dictatorship;
• We should not ask about international monitors when we cannot tolerate international rulings on points of law ourselves; that sounds hypocritical, to those who do not realise that our solicitous query about monitors is born out of concern for mankind in general, unconnected to concern for our own condition or concern for our conquered subject races;
• We should not ask our slighting questions and then suggest that the conversation should cease, before similar questions might be asked back by those whom we have slighted;
• We should not, as materialists and active destroyers of religion and the religious, talk about abstracts such as the 'momentum of life';
• We should not remind others about our own history by talking about others having been occupied by external invaders;
• We should not allow people to recall that we had to battle to get rid of our own external invaders, when they achieved it through peaceful means, and we should not allow neutral observers to wonder if that approach has entered into our DNA, making others peace-loving while we are naturally belligerent;
• We should stop gazing at the universe and gaze at the little planet that we occupy, and we should not try to push smaller neighbours into smaller corners of the little planet.

Very valuable advice, and we will no doubt all benefit from it, including your good selves.

 

[MilSpec]

classic Joe Shearer !!

Sorry, I am feeling stupider than usual (and that's pretty stupid, as you have pointed out from time to time). Would you like to send me a dumbed-down version? Why would an act by an undemocratic Communist tyranny make India the biggest, or the second biggest, or the third biggest democracy? Why would such an act affect the adjective attached to the size of Indian democracy at all?

Please earn merit and help your intellectually handicapped fellow human being.



I agree, we should not enter into a war of words. Let us count the ways not to do so.

• We should not ask about elections, which were held, if we do not hold them ourselves;
• We should not ask about their being free and fair, when we look at it from the point of view of a single party dictatorship;
• We should not ask about international monitors when we cannot tolerate international rulings on points of law ourselves; that sounds hypocritical, to those who do not realise that our solicitous query about monitors is born out of concern for mankind in general, unconnected to concern for our own condition or concern for our conquered subject races;
• We should not ask our slighting questions and then suggest that the conversation should cease, before similar questions might be asked back by those whom we have slighted;
• We should not, as materialists and active destroyers of religion and the religious, talk about abstracts such as the 'momentum of life';
• We should not remind others about our own history by talking about others having been occupied by external invaders;
• We should not allow people to recall that we had to battle to get rid of our own external invaders, when they achieved it through peaceful means, and we should not allow neutral observers to wonder if that approach has entered into our DNA, making others peace-loving while we are naturally belligerent;
• We should stop gazing at the universe and gaze at the little planet that we occupy, and we should not try to push smaller neighbours into smaller corners of the little planet.

Very valuable advice, and we will no doubt all benefit from it, including your good selves.

 

[DesiGuy1403]

Arundhati Roy and The Hindu....probably made for each other.
Both the person and news paper have as much credibility as Pakistani PM in his own country