Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would you apply the same lense when a TTP terrorist blows up a bus full of people in peshawar or Quetta. After all, PA is also targetting TTP cadres in a KP areas and a lot of civilians are also getting killed as collatoral damage and they are not even throwing rocks. They get killed just because they are in proximity of a suspected militant camp and a bomb from F 16 can not distinguish between the two.
So apart from the oft repeated mantra of Disputed area, the 2 situations are not too different. If you justify a mumbai, then you are in same vain, justifying a Lahore, Quetta or Peshawar.. Aren't you?
funny they are also protesting Obama and USA.
Kashmiri Freedom fighters have legitimate right of self determination and that has been recognized by UN . You may term those resolutions as mantras, but it remains a fact. Basing on those resolutions they have some demands. But who are TPP and what are their demands, what is basis of their terrorist act. Moreover they are recognized as terrorist all over the world even by Indian government but few Indian members of this forum have different opinion.
You say if we justify Mumbai, how can we justify Mumbai once we have passed through that pain number of times. No act can be justified where unarmed , untrained and peaceful citizens are put into such situations may it be anywhere in the world.
Buring is church and burning a Quran is not the same thing from a legal stand point in a secular country
While I totally oppose the burning of Quran in the US, its not legally a crime (as long as it is the property of the one burning it)
Buring a church or any building so to say, is legally a crime.
Hence the difference..
Let me draw it out for you...
1. Kashmir Resolution does not give a right to LeT to do a Mumbai 26/11
2. People who caused 26/11 are also termed as Terrorists by the whole world like TTP and even by Pakistani govt, but few Pakistani members of this forum have different opinion.
My post was in response to Gazzi's post who did sound like as if he felt Mumbai was acceptable
"If India says it is a democracy, then why not let us protest?" Sultan said. "When they stop us, we throw stones, and then they fire at us."
Wasim Khalid, a reporter for the Rising Kashmir newspaper, said journalists were unable to do their job Monday after the government imposed an embargo on local reporting. "The curfew is so strict, even ambulances can't go," he said. "There is so much anger."
you miserably fail to convince.....
and you are forgetting to look at the broader picture
back on point, anti-indian sentiment in the valley is at an all time high. hindustan will sooner or later realize that status quo is un-sustainable.
the ground realities simply wont be on their side in the long run; what is important is that Pakistan continues its moral support to Kashmiris under occupation.
Please refer to second para of my quoted post it addresses your point 1 and 2
If it is to respond Gazzi then you may quote his post. Thanks buddy
Here is the largest "democracy" again killing innocent Kashmiris because they speak out and protest.
india is not the largest democracy, its the largest hypocrisy, and those who shamelessly support the killings of Kashmiri people, just because Kashmiris protest, are just as bad as those who kill these innocent Kashmiris.