Trac
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2010
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 0
No - the blood of the 11 year old is on the hands of every Indian who supports the occupation and subjugation of Kashmir and the denial of the right to self-determination to them, promised them by the Indian State and the International community through the UNSC resolutions.
Had the Kashmiris been allowed to exercise their right to self-determination, there would be be no riots against Indian occupation.
This morally bankrupt argument regurgitated by many Indians is the equivalent of a rapist accusing a woman being raped for being responsible for her injuries because she 'struggled and fought back' against her ****.
Give me a break ... No one is taking a 11 year old boy in protest i think you are also agree with me
But those terrorist using women and kids as their shield so that they fire bullets to Indian arm forces and in response when Police fire bullets so those innocent women and kids got killed and terrorist can make profit of their dead just like this issue
What a low level techtics ... sham on them