hmmm...nice nice....lets gets busy on the keyboard,shall we???
I will try to post my arguments in an organized manner....
1. maoists and nexalites have been waiting to be delivered for 60 years, not even a iota of considerations. In Democracy allpeople share it equaly.
The rivers of democracy don't start flowing from the barrel of a gun.....enough said....
I dont know what definition of Democracy you follow.
While you are half way around the World in Canada(I assume),I was born and brought up in a place which is considered to be one of the most naxalite infested region..Be rest assured,I know more about ground realities.I know for a fact that these people are of no good.
2. Kashmiris have a genuine objection to the forced amalgamation and of their land and of Indian rule, if u have iota of decency and Indian had the real Democracy it will not continue to kill for 60 years no matter if they are as u lebal them infiltrators. u honestly do something about this and must stop killing. Remember killing one humn is as if killed the whole humanity.
The insurgency problems in Kashmir are due to external agencies which are based mainly in Pakistan.The idea of employing terrorism as external state policy was originally formulated by Zia ul Haq.Even former President of Pakistan Parvez Musharraf admitted to using this policy in his own autobiography, "In the Line of Fire: A Memoir".The paperback edition comes for $20.47 at amazon.U can have a look at it if u want to....
The Indian Army is basically stationed in Kashmir because the Democratic Republic of India reserves its rights to protect its territories from external threats,threats which are very much real and much more than any other province in India.Events like the Kargil war has infact proved and thereby proved this ...
Reference reading....
3. In a real Democracy as it is in Canada u listen to the greviences and allow people to choose as Cananda did in the case of Quebec, What a great Country run by and for Democracy. I stand and salute Canada.
No comments.I never been to Canada.I think I know very little about Canada,and I dont like to comment on anything I dont have proper knowledge about....
4. your statement about Indian never allowing plebicite is a statement of a DICTATOR and that is what India is as it did not hasitate for a second to attack Sikh Holy places to kill people who questioned the rule and wanted more say as they wanted to say that punjab is for Punjabis. it is a shame that India used force and killed hundereds of which many innocents. A shamefull act. very unlike a Democratic country.
I will assume that u r talking about Plebiscite in the state of Jammu & Kashmir.Well,at this point let me tell u that I ll have to play the role of a myth buster over here.One of the condition for Plebiscite according to Article 47(1948) of UNSC was "To secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistani nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purposes of fighting, and to prevent any intrusion into the State of such elements and any furnishing of material aid to those fighting in the State"...This clause was never fulfilled considering Pakistan still holds a part of the territory,the part which was actually annexed by these fighting tribesmen.So,I dont find a reason for India to hold its own end true while the other party has not complied to its own part.
U can have a look at a copy of the original resolution and tell me whether I am giving the correct information or not.Here is a link...
RESOLUTION 47 (1948) ON THE INDIA-PAKISTAN QUESTION SUBMITTED JOINTLY BY THE REPRESENTATIVES FOR BELGIUM, CANADA, CHINA, COLUMBIA, THE UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ADOPTED BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL AT ITS 286TH MEETING HELD ON 21 APRIL, 1948. (DOCUMENT NO. S/726, DATED THE 21ST APRIL, 1948).
Reference reading.....
Now let us move our focus to the Sikh issue.I think u r addressing Operation Bluestar launched by the Indian Govt.I just wonder what were all those guns,grenades and rocket launchers doing inside the Golden temple of Amritsar if the movement was at all a peaceful one.Can u tell me where from all these weapons came??The whole of Punjab is definitely not separatist.On contrary the brave sons of Punjab are as patriotic as anyone in India can be.
I ll post an entire video documentary that shows the arms haul inside the Golden Temple after the operation.
Almost similar situations were faced in Pakistan during the Lal Masjid event.Care to tell me ur views about it???
u can call it Democracy, but if u have even a spec of decency u will refrain from calling it so. Reasons are following.
Last but not the least...I have already posted my arguments to ur reasons...Please go through them...But I must address this part i particular....Its rather funny to see this coming from someone of Pakistani origin....a country where Democracy had been regularly strangled by frequent military coupe..
I will give u an entire list:
1. 1958:Military coup in Pakistan. Army Chief and Defence Minister Gen. Ayub Khan overthrows the government of Iskander Mirza and becomes President after a winning a rigged referendum.
2.1969:Military coup in Pakistan, Army Chief Gen. Yahya Khan forces President Field Marshal Ayub Khan (who himself came to power in a coup) to hand over power to him.
3.1977:Military coup in Pakistan with U.S. support. Army Chief Gen. Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq overthrows the civilian government and hangs Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in 1979 after a sham trial.
4.1999:Military coup in Pakistan. Army refuses to obey Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's government. General Pervez Musharraf becomes president (with the title "Chief Executive") and exiles Sharif to Saudi Arabia allegedly on a self-exile ten-year contract of not participating in politics, after he was convicted of hijacking and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Having said all these,many people may think that I am prejudiced against Pakistanis or Pakistan,which is not true.I just expect some people to do a bit of retrospection before actually posting ...........