What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
The moment millions of refugees started to flood into India's NE and Bengal it ceased to be an internal affair of Pakistan.
There was nothing illegal in India intervening at thast time as the migrants were weakening our economy and changing the NE demography.

None of this is true in case of Kashmir

As per plans by Traiter Mujib they went to India. a planned exedus to attack and it was not possible without an excuse, this was an excuse to attack as an internal traiters Mukti Buhinis and exteranl invadors cooperating to set up a stage.

Pakistan Army had no gains from those who left East Pakistan. Gains were only to be had by India enabling it to use this staged plan.
 
.
ok then we will put kashmir on the list of specially administerd region,have a proxy president,set up a proxy supreme court,and will rename it independent jammu and kashmir,ur issues will b solved?:no:

No u canot do anything unilatertaly in Kashmir, it has to be done under U.N supervision and agreed to by Pakistan.

Kashmir is a disputed territory
 
.
Well I want to understand the strike, it does not seems just a simple one. There are definitely a lot of anti India people there, not sure how many are pro Pakistan. Also some of this anti India feeling is manufactured. If they were against India since 1947 then why did they supported India in 1965, also why no demonstration happened at the time of Kargil? Doing a similar strike at that time would have meant a lot. Why only after 1980 they started doing this? The generation of 1947 which wanted to decided was almost dead and new generation took over.
 
.
Well I want to understand the strike, it does not seems just a simple one. There are definitely a lot of anti India people there, not sure how many are pro Pakistan. Also some of this anti India feeling is manufactured. If they were against India since 1947 then why did they supported India in 1965, also why no demonstration happened at the time of Kargil? Doing a similar strike at that time would have meant a lot. Why only after 1980 they started doing this? The generation of 1947 which wanted to decided was almost dead and new generation took over.

Strange questions, Clearly they are shouting anti Indian slogans, so they are anti Indians gatherings.

If it was manufrctured than why would they shout such slogans and in such great numbers.

About Kagil, most of the info about kargil at the time was under controls by India. A black out of sort.

They were roiting before 1980 but it was not as fierce as it is now, the reason was that India did amulgamate Kashmir unilatarly into Indian union and that was the catalyst for Kashmiris to revolt, before 1980 it was undestood that it will be dicided by the chioce of People of kashmir.
 
Last edited:
.
India urged to prosecute soldiers for IHK killings

* HRW says army should hand over soldiers to police for trial in civilian court

SRINAGAR: The Human Rights Watch on Tuesday urged India to prosecute soldiers accused of killing three men during an alleged fake gunbattle in Indian-held Kashmir (IHK).

The Indian military said the victims were rebels who were killed when it foiled an infiltration by militants along the Line of Control, the de facto border that divides Kashmir between India and Pakistan.

But the victims’ families said they were innocent civilians who had been abducted by the army three days before the supposed battle on April 30.

The army has suspended an officer and removed another from his command pending enquiries into the killings.

“If the army is serious about punishing those responsible for this latest incident, it will transfer the suspects to the police for trial in a civilian court,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, a senior researcher at the Human Rights Watch.

“Given the army’s poor record in holding its soldiers accountable, there is no reason to believe that a military court can be trusted to deliver justice,” she said. Ganguly said the killing of the three men underscored the urgency for the Indian government to repeal the Armed Forces Special Powers Act.

The act gives soldiers wide powers to shoot, arrest and search suspects, and is widely detested by the people of IHK. afp

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
.
Indian state sponsored terrorism needs to be made public. 1 fake encounter out of thousands is a drop in the bucket.
 
.
BBC News - The valley at the centre of the Kashmir insurgency

No, not the Kashmir Valley - but the Neelam Valley. This shows how the people of Pakistan occupied Kashmir are being coerced into terrorism by Pak govt agencies.

The recent disappearance of two men in the Pakistani-administered Kashmir has once again raised questions over Pakistan's role in the murky militant war in Kashmir.

They had once worked as guides, who are used by militants needing their local and navigational expertise to traverse the treacherous mountain passes that separate Indian-administered Kashmir from Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

Relatives of the missing men say they were "picked up" by a couple of Pakistani intelligence officials on the morning of 25 May from their houses in Falakan - a village in the Neelum valley region - and coerced into once again working as guides.

The story is a familiar one for most Kashmiris living near the 720km (447 miles) Line of Control (LoC) - the de facto boundary that divides the disputed Kashmir region between India and Pakistan.

But this is the first time the locals have been willing to speak publicly about it.

Relatives of the men and other residents of Falakan village blocked the main road between Athmuqam and Muzaffarabad on Thursday.

The protest took place because the administration failed to provide them with any information about the missing guides by the promised date of 10 June.

The local assistant commissioner and senior police officers negotiated with the protesters, who gave them another week to investigate the matter.

The protesters have threatened further demonstrations if either the men or their bodies are not handed over to the relatives.

'No contact'

"Two men of the agency [the name used by local people to describe Pakistan's ISI intelligence services] came to our house on 25 May and asked my husband, Mohammad Iqbal, to accompany them," Zulfan Bibi, a mother of five, told the BBC Urdu service.

"My husband told them he was getting old and his eyesight had weakened and so it was difficult for him to walk the mountain trails he used to cover in the past. But they threatened us with consequences if he did not go," she said.

"Later in the evening, those officials came back to inform me that my husband went across the LoC and has since made no contact with them."

Another woman, Taslim Bibi, whose husband Mohammad Salim was taken away by the same officials, tells a similar story.

"They wanted him to lead mujahideen [militants] to the other [Indian] side," she says.

Their story came to light on 2 June when the people of Falakan village blocked traffic on the road that connects Athmuqam, the administrative centre of Neelum valley, with the regional capital Muzaffarabad.

They were protesting over the refusal of local intelligence officials and the administration to inform them about the status of the two men.

Militant manpower

An embarrassed local administration ordered a police inquiry, but residents believe the police have no leverage over the security agencies operating in the area.
Neelum valley The area has frequently been subjected to Indian shelling

The question is, why would the Pakistani intelligence officials "abduct" these men?

Two reasons come to mind.

One, the men received advance fees for leading a group of militants into the Indian part of Kashmir and then became reluctant to fulfil their promise.

Second, like most guides and porters, they switched to other professions when Pakistan put tabs on militant activity in 2004, and were therefore not willing to get back into the game.

Pakistani intelligence services are widely believed to have organised and regulated the infiltration of Islamist militants into Indian-administered Kashmir since 1988-89.

That year, the Soviet pullout from Afghanistan left a surplus of trained militant manpower which they could divert to Kashmir, analysts say.

Since most of these militants were non-Kashmiri, their handlers needed local people with the knowledge of the terrain to work as guides.

Worst hit

During 1990s, tens of thousands of villagers from the LoC region were earning a living by working as guides and porters for the "agency" during the May-September timeframe used by militants to launch their attacks.
Soldier in Indian-administered Kashmir The mountains of Kashmir are renowned for their harsh terrain

Every time the Indians suspected a forthcoming incursion, they would start shelling the Pakistani positions and militants' camps - both invariably located in or close to villages on the Pakistani side.

Neelum valley was the worst hit.

The entire 200km (124 miles) stretch of the Neelum River gorge that runs in an east-west direction is exposed to Indians who command heights along the left bank of the river.

Along with Bagh region and Lipa valley to its south, Neelum valley is also the most suitable launching point for militants, as it offers plenty of cover in terms of forests, deep ravines and high altitude passes that are difficult to traverse.

In the 1990s, the Neelum valley was subjected to devastating Indian fire that completely destroyed its roads, health and education infrastructure.

For more than a decade, it remained under virtual siege. Bunkers became an essential part of civilian life.

The situation eased in November 2003, when Pakistan and India called a ceasefire across the LoC and started peace talks.

The ceasefire still holds, but since 2008 there have been reports of renewed militant activity along some sections of the LoC.

The first independent confirmation of this came in May 2009 when 12 people died in an avalanche in the desolate Bimla mountain range of Neelum valley, close to the LoC.

Official sources have since confirmed the victims were members of a militant team trying to cross the boundary.

In June 2009, the BBC Urdu service published excerpts from a secret police report confirming that militants had started setting up bases close to the LoC in Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

These developments are making the people of Neelum valley nervous.

In August 2008, hundreds of people twice hit the streets in Athmuqam town to protest against renewed militant activity in the area, saying they feared the Indians may resume shelling of their villages and homes.

The protests of 2 and 10 June are the latest reminder that Pakistani officials may not have abandoned the militant option just yet.
 
.
and the source is bbc...................CAN BE CLAIMED AS CREDIBLE.

good to see people of Pakistan administered kashmir raising their voice against terrorism
 
.
DAWN.COM | Columnists | The Kashmir dilemma

Gen Ayub Khan, when at the helm of the Pakistan government, is believed to have told Soviet Union’s Prime Minister Kosygin that if India were to come to a settlement with Sheikh Abdullah, heading the Jammu and Kashmir government at that time, Pakistan might accept the agreement.

Soon after, Sheikh Abdullah was detained for more than 11 years in India. He had reportedly asked New Delhi to make the terms of the Instrument of Accession good. The state had given to the centre only three subjects: defence, foreign affairs and communications.

Since then the All Parties Hurriyat Conference has jumped into the arena. Its agenda goes far beyond Sheikh Abdullah’s or, for that matter, that of the ruling National Conference. Unfortunately, the Hurriyat has split into hardliners and moderates.

Whatever its verdict on the government headed by Omar Abdullah, Sheikh Abdullah’s grandson, the latter has made the security forces accountable. The suspension by the army of a major and removal of a colonel from service for their ‘role’ in dubious encounters is not a small achievement. In fact, he has ordered an inquiry into fake encounters of the past, and strict orders have been given to the security forces not to violate human rights.

Hurriyat chairman Mirwaiz Umar Farooq said: “We expected the prime minister to start a bold political initiative on Kashmir but nothing of that sort has come through.” Obviously, the Hurriyat has not taken into account Dr Manmohan Singh’s message that the government was committed to pushing forward the process of negotiation.

The Indian prime minister wanted the Hurriyat to come on board before India held a series of ministerial-level meetings with Pakistan. It is naïve on the part of Mirwaiz to demand a public announcement on what the government has in view. A dialogue is the only way to hammer out differences. In the case of Kashmir, Pakistan is also a party.

True, Srinagar was shut and hundreds were on the street when the prime minister arrived there. But this is the exercise over which the Hurriyat has gone many a time before. People are tired. They see very little on the horizon. They have sacrificed nearly all that they had.

I think the failure of the Hurriyat is in having preferred the bullet to the ballot. They revolted when they, young and idealistic, witnessed elections in Kashmir in 1987. Indeed, the polls were rigged. But going across the border, getting training and returning with weapons was the reaction of angry, helpless people. Violence, as some Hurriyat leaders have realised, was not an option which could have yielded results. Coming into conflict with the state which is many times stronger was foolhardy.

Believe me I am not underestimating the sacrifices of the people. Very few movements in the world have been so determined and so sustained.

The Hurriyat should have returned to the ballot box after the violent agitation it had launched was having diminishing returns. In violence, the people in India witnessed a forceful cessation of Kashmir, considered part of the country. The Hurriyat movement was seen as a challenge to the country’s integrity.

The Hurriyat should have tried to capture the Jammu and Kashmir assembly. Instead, they propagated the boycott of elections. Their argument was that the polls under the aegis of the Indian Election Commission were not acceptable to them. They proposed supervision by UN observers. No sovereign country could have accepted this.

Had the Hurriyat leaders demanded that Indian human rights activists should be the observers, they might have had the consent of New Delhi. But would the Hurriyat have won? This uncertainty might have been the main reason for it not participating in elections which have their own dynamics. Popular agitators are not normally put in charge.

The Hurriyat’s tilt towards Pakistan, probably necessitated by the situation in which they were, has distanced it from India. That the solution of Kashmir is not possible without Islamabad is understandable. But the Hurriyat did not have to play the Muslim card. It only created further doubts in the mind of the majority in India. After the exodus of most Hindu Pandits from Kashmir, the valley has nearly 96 per cent Muslims.

But this is the Hurriyat’s weakness, not strength. Not having the support of the Hindu-majority Jammu and the Buddhist-majority Ladakh, the Hurriyat has forfeited the right to speak for the entire state. It should have at least wooed the Kashmiri Pandits, many still in camps, to return their homes. Some Hurriyat leaders have realised this a bit late. But the party as such still cannot pursue the matter wholeheartedly because a few among them do not want Hindus back till the Kashmir solution is finally settled.

Even in their demand, the Hurriyat has been equivocal. They have oscillated between autonomy and independence. Realising that Pakistan is equally opposed to independence, as India is, the Hurriyat wants a solution which is acceptable to the people of Kashmir. But that has not been spelled out. The fact that Jammu and Ladakh are nowhere in the picture means that the Hurriyat’s demand is only for the Valley. This brings the Hurriyat in conflict with what Manmohan Singh has said many a time that he has no mandate to change the borders.

After the 9/11 attack in New York, the scenario in the region from Afghanistan to India has changed beyond proportions. America and Pakistan one hand and India and Pakistan on the other are trying to come to terms with new developments. Kashmir too figures but in the larger context.

The Hurriyat might do better if it were to confine talks between Srinagar and Delhi till India and Pakistan reach a settlement on Kashmir. The Hurriyat should ask New Delhi first to restore the ante-1952 situation where Srinagar gave it three subjects: foreign affairs, defence and communications.

The writer is a senior journalist based in Delhi.
 
.
Too much water has flown under the bridge to expect a return to pre 52 status.

The selective demands relating to Kashmir only & not Jammu & Laddakh to smells of ulterior motives.

The Communists too often feel differently with GOI on numerous issues yet seek change by participating in the electoral process. Sticking to the stand of ' not accepting' the Indian constitution etc is making Hurriyat dig itself deeper into the hole it now finds itself in.

In India change happens only thru the ballot box. As MMS has also said changing borders is not an option.
 
.
Prime Minister uses Urdu to connect with Kahsmiris | ummid.com

Srinagar: His finger right on the pulse of his audience, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Monday connected well with Kashmiris when he addressed a gathering in the language they understand the best - Urdu.

At the fifth convocation of an agricultural university here, Manmohan Singh, who loves listening to Urdu poetry of Ghalib, spoke in chaste Urdu for his nearly 25-minute speech praying to "khuda" (god) for the "taraqqi" (prosperity) and "kaamyaabi" (success) of Kashmiris.

He addressed them as "doston" (friends), knowing the "ahamiyat" (importance - the word he used frequently) of the language while addressing the "naujawan" (youth) of the state that has been battling separatist violence since 1989.

"Hamare naujawan hamaare mulk ka mustaqbil hain. Hamein apne naujawanon se bahut badi umeedein hain," he said about the expectations he has from the youth of the only Muslim majority state in India. Urdu is the official language of Jammu and Kashmir.

The prime minister chose to call it "Hindustan" rather than India or Bharat "where Kashmiri youth can find lots of avenues for their 'zahni (psychological), jazbaati (emotional) and peshawarana (professional) taraqqi".

It was Manmohan Singh's empathetic tone toward disillusioned Kashmiris that attracted rapt attention from the audience inviting frequent applause.

"Main jaanta hoon ki behtareen taaleem haasil karne ke baad bhi kam mauqe milne se kis qadr maayoosi hoti hai... Hum rozgaar ke mufeed mauqe faraham karenge," the prime minister said sharing the disillusion of Kashmiri youth and assuring them that adequate employment opportunities will be created.

He did mention that he was aware of the alleged human rights violations in Jammu and Kashmir by security forces, particularly in the context of three Kashmiri civilians purportedly killed by army in a staged shootout.

"Human rights ki paamali (abuse) se mutalliq aapki shikayaton se main waaqif hoon," he said, adding "salaamati ke daste (security forces)" have been strictly ordered to show "sabr-o-tahammul (patience)" and protect "huqooq (rights)" of the people.

About the economic reconstruction and development of the state, he said the government had initiated a programme of "iqtisaadi taameer-e-nau aur taraqqi" for which he had consulted "behtareen iqtisaadi maahireen (the best economic experts)".

He also congratulated the students of the university who were handed over degrees.

"Main unko mubarakbaad deta hoon jinhone aaj degree haasil ki... Kucch pecheeda masaail ke bawajood main aap sabe ke liye roshan mustaqbil dekh raha hoon... Khuda kare aap ke raaste roshan hon," he said praying for the bright future of Kashmiri youth.
 
.
BBC News - The valley at the centre of the Kashmir insurgency

By M Ilyas Khan
BBC News, Islamabad

The recent disappearance of two men in the Pakistani-administered Kashmir has once again raised questions over Pakistan's role in the murky militant war in Kashmir.

They had once worked as guides, who are used by militants needing their local and navigational expertise to traverse the treacherous mountain passes that separate Indian-administered Kashmir from Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

Relatives of the missing men say they were "picked up" by a couple of Pakistani intelligence officials on the morning of 25 May from their houses in Falakan - a village in the Neelum valley region - and coerced into once again working as guides.

The story is a familiar one for most Kashmiris living near the 720km (447 miles) Line of Control (LoC) - the de facto boundary that divides the disputed Kashmir region between India and Pakistan.

But this is the first time the locals have been willing to speak publicly about it.

Relatives of the men and other residents of Falakan village blocked the main road between Athmuqam and Muzaffarabad on Thursday.

The protest took place because the administration failed to provide them with any information about the missing guides by the promised date of 10 June.

The local assistant commissioner and senior police officers negotiated with the protesters, who gave them another week to investigate the matter.

The protesters have threatened further demonstrations if either the men or their bodies are not handed over to the relatives.

'No contact'

"Two men of the agency [the name used by local people to describe Pakistan's ISI intelligence services] came to our house on 25 May and asked my husband, Mohammad Iqbal, to accompany them," Zulfan Bibi, a mother of five, told the BBC Urdu service.

"My husband told them he was getting old and his eyesight had weakened and so it was difficult for him to walk the mountain trails he used to cover in the past. But they threatened us with consequences if he did not go," she said.

"Later in the evening, those officials came back to inform me that my husband went across the LoC and has since made no contact with them."

Another woman, Taslim Bibi, whose husband Mohammad Salim was taken away by the same officials, tells a similar story.

"They wanted him to lead mujahideen [militants] to the other [Indian] side," she says.

Their story came to light on 2 June when the people of Falakan village blocked traffic on the road that connects Athmuqam, the administrative centre of Neelum valley, with the regional capital Muzaffarabad.

They were protesting over the refusal of local intelligence officials and the administration to inform them about the status of the two men.

Militant manpower

An embarrassed local administration ordered a police inquiry, but residents believe the police have no leverage over the security agencies operating in the area.

The question is, why would the Pakistani intelligence officials "abduct" these men?

Two reasons come to mind.

One, the men received advance fees for leading a group of militants into the Indian part of Kashmir and then became reluctant to fulfil their promise.

Second, like most guides and porters, they switched to other professions when Pakistan put tabs on militant activity in 2004, and were therefore not willing to get back into the game.

Pakistani intelligence services are widely believed to have organised and regulated the infiltration of Islamist militants into Indian-administered Kashmir since 1988-89.

That year, the Soviet pullout from Afghanistan left a surplus of trained militant manpower which they could divert to Kashmir, analysts say.

Since most of these militants were non-Kashmiri, their handlers needed local people with the knowledge of the terrain to work as guides.

Worst hit

During 1990s, tens of thousands of villagers from the LoC region were earning a living by working as guides and porters for the "agency" during the May-September timeframe used by militants to launch their attacks.

Every time the Indians suspected a forthcoming incursion, they would start shelling the Pakistani positions and militants' camps - both invariably located in or close to villages on the Pakistani side.

Neelum valley was the worst hit.

The entire 200km (124 miles) stretch of the Neelum River gorge that runs in an east-west direction is exposed to Indians who command heights along the left bank of the river.

Along with Bagh region and Lipa valley to its south, Neelum valley is also the most suitable launching point for militants, as it offers plenty of cover in terms of forests, deep ravines and high altitude passes that are difficult to traverse.

In the 1990s, the Neelum valley was subjected to devastating Indian fire that completely destroyed its roads, health and education infrastructure.

For more than a decade, it remained under virtual siege. Bunkers became an essential part of civilian life.

The situation eased in November 2003, when Pakistan and India called a ceasefire across the LoC and started peace talks.

The ceasefire still holds, but since 2008 there have been reports of renewed militant activity along some sections of the LoC.

The first independent confirmation of this came in May 2009 when 12 people died in an avalanche in the desolate Bimla mountain range of Neelum valley, close to the LoC.

Official sources have since confirmed the victims were members of a militant team trying to cross the boundary.

In June 2009, the BBC Urdu service published excerpts from a secret police report confirming that militants had started setting up bases close to the LoC in Pakistani-administered Kashmir.

These developments are making the people of Neelum valley nervous.

In August 2008, hundreds of people twice hit the streets in Athmuqam town to protest against renewed militant activity in the area, saying they feared the Indians may resume shelling of their villages and homes.

The protests of 2 and 10 June are the latest reminder that Pakistani officials may not have abandoned the militant option just yet.
 
.
“India can chain my limbs but she cannot shackle my heart; India can break my bones but she cannot crush my will and determination,” Jalil Andrabi, the Ex-Chairman, Kashmir Commission of Jurists uttered these words in Geneva, addressing the UN Sub Commission on Kashmir, on August 17, 1995. He is no more in this world but his words are still resounding in the blood-dripping valley of Kashmir providing an everlasting, never ending warmth and courage to the freedom-fighters in the Indian Held Kashmir. A few months after his address, he was picked up by notorious Indian Rashtria Rifles, tortured and finally killed in custody. But his brutal murder could not suppress the blazing passion of the helpless Kashmiris and today after so many years, we can see the freedom movement still going on in a more zestful manner. In the Occupied Kashmir the Indian security forces are doing their best to curb and crush the freedom movement but the freedom fighters are more determined. Fake encounters, rapes, kidnapping and so many other ruthless weapons seem ineffective in front of their determination. The Kashmiris are determined to prove that they are not slaves; they are the masters of their own destiny.

Killing of innocent Kashmiris under the shield of ‘fake encounters’ has become a routine matter, says The Hindu on 15th of May ,2010.According to the details, a few Army men killed five civilians in a fake encounter in Jammu and Kashmir. They entered into a conspiracy to pick up a few innocent civilians and stage-managed an encounter to create the impression that militants responsible for the killing of 36 Sikhs on March 20, 2000 were neutralized. Their purpose behind this fake encounter was to get out of turn promotion and win cash awards. In another incident of the same nature earlier in Siachen, a few Indian army officers had constructed bunkers, and had them demolished by firing a rocket. They ordered soldiers to act to be video-graphed as dead soldiers. They made them swear before God that they would not reveal the fake killing.

The helpless people of Machil area of Kupwara District would never be able to forget the intervening night of April 29 and 30, when three residents of Nadihal Rafiabad, Muhammad Shafi Lone, Shehzad Ahmed and Riyaz Ahmed were killed in a staged encounter. Their bodies were exhumed from a graveyard in Kalaroos, Kupwara and identified by their families According to the details, on the directions of Major Opinder of 4 Rajput Rifles, a trooper of Territorial Army, a former SPO and an army agent had motivated the youth to work as laborers for the army in lieu of handsome money. It is stated that later the youth were handed over to the army and subsequently killed in a fake encounter on the orders of the Major. During the investigation the army officials had claimed to have foiled an infiltration bid and recovered 5 AK rifles, over 200 rounds of ammunition and even Pakistani currency from the killed youth. The 4 Rajput Rifles unit of the army involved in the killing is yet to handover to the police the arms and ammunition, which it claimed to have recovered from the youth. The rage and fury over this fake encounter has created a lot of law and order disturbance in the area. People are demanding an open judicial inquiry of this fake encounter.

All time increasing atrocities against the innocent people have made the social religious, economic and political life of Kashmiris very agonizing and painful. The Kashmiris are of the opinion that there could be no peace in the region unless the valley is in the cruel clutches of the Indian security Agencies. The government of India has provided a legal shelter to these atrocities through the inhuman law called Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA). In fact this act was designed for the North Eastern Indian States in 1958 for a year but it is still very successfully being used in the Indian Held Kashmir. The Indian army has been given a free hand to use AFSPA in the name of insurgency and militancy. International Commission on Human Rights has recently issued a report which points out the missing of more than ten thousand people in the last twenty years in the Indian Occupied territory of Kashmir. It is feared that most of these missing people have been killed in fake encounters. The commission has pointed out towards another very pathetic situation; the people killed in fake encounters and in police custody are usually buried in mass graves near Army and Police camps which are usually out of the access of media or the common public.

The Kashmiris are so helpless that they are unable even to protest against Indian atrocities. Those who raise their voices against the Indian cruelties have to face inexpressible torture and turmoil. They are pushed into dark and narrow prison cells without any reference or record. Their families are most of the time unaware of their being in the custody of the Indian army. It has also been reported that such protestors are so inhumanly tortured that they very often lose their lives. The atrocities chalked out by the Indian government in the Occupied Kashmir sometimes become unbearable even for the military officers. Inwardly so many of them don’t want to be a part of this viciousness and cruelty; the only door left open to them is to quit the army services. An increasing trend of army officers leaving the force mid-way has been very much alarming for the Indian government in the last five years. More than 1,000 officers quitted the army between 2005 and 2007. The number of officers who sought premature retirement in 2008 is reportedly more than a 1,000 -- almost equal to the number who left in the past three years.

The Kashmir issue is a continuous bone of contention between the two nuclear countries Pakistan and India. The two countries are always in a state of war heading towards the brink of nuclear catastrophe just because of the Kashmir dispute. The confrontation on this issue is destroying peace of the whole of South-Asian region. The government of Pakistan has always been eager to settle the issue through negotiations and table talk. So many confidence building measures have been suggested to the Indian authorities but India never showed any positive gesture in this regard. Whenever there is a peace process going on between the two countries, India tries to disrupt it. The basic purpose behind this disruption is to keep Pakistan away from the demand of peace and prosperity of the Kashmiri people.

Unluckily the international community has been ignoring the human rights violation in the Occupied Kashmir for the last 63 years. During all this period the people of Kashmir have suffered senseless oppression at the hands of the occupying power. Thousands have been incarcerated; an untold number tortured or maimed. The families of over 10,000 people disappeared within the past twenty years, are still waiting for the return of their loved ones without knowing whether they are dead or alive. This entire tragic situation is simply because of the denial of the right of self-determination to the people of Kashmir. The people of Kashmir need justice. They are silently looking towards all those forces which claim to be the care-takers of universal peace and harmony. Such forces must keep in their mind a time-tested principle, ‘Justice delayed, justice denied’.

The writer is a Pakistan based analyst on defense and strategic affairs.

MTT%20-%20Pakistan%20-%20Syed%20Salahuddin%20vowed%20to%20wage%20a%20holy%20war%20to%20liberate%20the%20Himalayan%20state%20of%20Kashmir%20from%20Indian%20Occupation.jpg

MTT - Pakistan - Syed Salahuddin vowed to wage a holy war to liberate the Himalayan state of Kashmir from Indian Occupation

MTT%20-%20Pakistan%20-%20Rape%20and%20killing%20incidents%20triggered%20a%20wave%20of%20protests%20across%20the%20Muslim-majority%20Kashmir%20valley.jpg

MTT - Pakistan - Rape and killing incidents triggered a wave of protests across the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley


MTT - Pakistan - Ten to One - That is how the Indian Army treat the Kashmiris in Occupied Kashmir

Kashmir - The Land of Passions
 
. .
One question to Mod ..Personal blogs are allowed in PDF?????...... if yes so have many more than this
 
.
Back
Top Bottom