What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
It would've been if India would've controlled its mobs... But with this attack Indian democracy has earned a big fat Zero.

Mob ?? It was just one guy who climbed on the table and gave him a couple of slaps and he was thrown out promptly along with rest Kashmiri Pandits.

Now Mirwaiz can press charges if he wants but this something like the shoe throwing incident on Zardari. One guy lost his cool and thats about it but people can draw conspiracies out of it, that it was preplanned and right wing parties were involved.
 
Oh bahi, this has now been proved that the Indian position on Kashmir is just that, violent. He was merely narrating the human rights violations, not campaigning for Azadi in the Indian states.

India is wrong, Kashmiris are right. This is now set in stone.

He is not campaigning for Azadi, but Azadi is his stated position. So the attack has more to do with his ideology but him narrating human right violations. A lot of people including many Kashmiri Pundits have been vocal against any Human Rights violation in Kashmir.
 
Mob ?? It was just one guy who climbed on the table and gave him a couple of slaps and he was thrown out promptly along with rest Kashmiri Pandits.

Now Mirwaiz can press charges if he wants but this something like the shoe throwing incident on Zardari. One guy lost his cool but thats about it.
Then why have 20 guys been arrested? Obviously there were more!
 
Oh bahi, this has now been proved that the Indian position on Kashmir is just that, violent. He was merely narrating the human rights violations, not campaigning for Azadi in the Indian states.

India is wrong, Kashmiris are right. This is now set in stone.


And how did we come to that conclusion? Just because Pakistan says so?

Its true India's approach could have been to the issue could have been better. But that doesnt mean that India has been proved wrong.
 
Oh bahi, this has now been proved that the Indian position on Kashmir is just that, violent. He was merely narrating the human rights violations, not campaigning for Azadi in the Indian states.

India is wrong, Kashmiris are right. This is now set in stone
.

The Term Human right Violations are Only Subjected to Democratic Nations, It is so... When there is Voice raised over it ,consider the Nation is Democratic... Other wise In How Many other Nations Have the "Human Right Activists" Survived???
 
Then why have 20 guys been arrested? Obviously there were more!

We have already earned a big fat zero from you, not much motivation left for us.
What should we do to satisfy your bleeding heart, do tell.
 
He is not campaigning for Azadi, but Azadi is his stated position. So the attack has more to do with his ideology but him narrating human right violations. A lot of people including many Kashmiri Pundits have been vocal against any Human Rights violation in Kashmir.
The human rights wasn't there to save them coming out. At that time where was it? My relatives (now in Ladakh, thanks to "oppressed poor Kashmiri radicals") also suffered what the Pandits suffered. My faith from human rights has waned and I find it only a tool to appease separatists and anti-national forces in Asia, so as to keep the conflicts up.

The commission should not be allowed in the state and warned not to meddle in national matters.

Kashmiri radicals have no right to ask for human rights after what they did to pandits and our people who were their fellow Kashmiris. At that time religion was of supreme importance to them for ethnic cleansing. And now they speak of "Kashmiri" independence. Yeah right...:coffee:
 
.

The Term Human right Violations are Only Subjected to Democratic Nations, It is so... When there is Voice raised over it ,consider the Nation is Democratic... Other wise In How Many other Nations Have the "Human Right Activists" Survived???
The question is that he is voicing India's human rights violations against Kashmiris to Indians so that Indians may wise and prevent their government from committing them further.

This act of violence against Mirwaiz is only to allow India to continue with its acts of human rights violations. He wasn't speaking for, against either the Pandits or the Azadi. He only pointed out the human rights violations committed by the Indian army

Furthermore I must point out one thing Human rights are accorded to everyone that is human. Not by governmental system.
 
:disagree:

You can't forgot, that

THAT 400,000 Kashmiri Pandits, which constituts 99% of the total population of Hindus living in Muslim majority area of the Kashmir Valley, were forcibly pushed out of the Valley by Muslim terrorists, trained in Pakistan, since the end of 1989. They have been forced to live the life of exiles in their own country, outside their homeland, by unleashing a systematic campaign of terror, murder, loot and arson...and Kashmiri pandits were angry cause whenever there is talk about kashmir why they were excluded?? kASHMIRI PANDITS needs to be included whenever any seminar or talk about kashmir will raised.....


Although this is not the right way to protest but they were in condition of rage cause of continuel denail of there existence in kashmir by political parties of kashmir...
 
The question is that he is voicing India's human rights violations against Kashmiris to Indians so that Indians may wise and prevent their government from committing them further.

When It comes to state of Internal Affairs the Govt is not single eyed, but the Public Cannot be diplomatic like Govt is, There anger was Even More Ignited When he Termed "Human Rights" Which Was Not Given to the Kashmiri Pandits By the so called Innocent Muslims of the Kashmir Vally , How Can You Expect the Crowd to be silent when the Guy tries to play Innocent in front of a Wounded Crowd??

This act of violence against Mirwaiz is only to allow India to continue with its acts of human rights violations.

You can not Use the Term Human Right Violation here as in here Public got Violent , You dont call Mob Wars "Human Right Violation" Do you??


He wasn't speaking for, against either the Pandits or the Azadi. He only pointed out the human rights violations committed by the Indian army

My dear Indian Army is Not Present in the the vally, How can You rise Questions and Displeasure against an Imagined enemy??

Furthermore I must point out one thing Human rights are accorded to everyone that is human. Not by governmental system.

I agree....;)
 
The question is that he is voicing India's human rights violations against Kashmiris to Indians so that Indians may wise and prevent their government from committing them further.

This act of violence against Mirwaiz is only to allow India to continue with its acts of human rights violations. He wasn't speaking for, against either the Pandits or the Azadi. He only pointed out the human rights violations committed by the Indian army

Furthermore I must point out one thing Human rights are accorded to everyone that is human. Not by governmental system.

If you have followed this news closely, you would have realised the Kashmiri pandits were not angered by his remarks on human right violations but were provoked by his comments on "Kashmir is not a part of India"...there fore the slogans of "Bharat Mata ki Jai" was being continuously raised outside the hall.
 
mirwaiz thought he could pull a nice stunt in Chandigarh but guess it boomeranged.. ha.. nice..
 
They were attacked by vishwa hindu pareshad saffron terrorist party not K pandits.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom