Kashmir is Pakistan!

[American Pakistani]

Mate looking at the map India belongs to pakistan

No Pakistan doesn't need india, it is like saying Somalia belongs to great britain, both different race, culture, history, etc etc.

Biggest comedy... if pakistan attacks it is called 'liberation', when india counter attacks, its international aggression and violation
This is more definition of hypocricy...

Pakistan has never attacked india, Kashmir is not india & is occupied territory, so your post is total B.S.

 

[American Pakistani]

Which parts of J&K were ' liberated' in 65 other than Chamb where the IA fell back from ??? Pak reached almost upto Akhnoor & fell back when pressure was put on Lahore.

India sees J&K as India. Therefore if India is attacked it reserves the perogative to counter attack at any place of its chosing - some thing Pak learnt the hard way.

As regards 48, India couldnt have stepped in till Hari Singh signed on the dotted line. India does not covet what Pak has - no anymore now. Pak is welcome to the 7 distts.

J&K is India and so shall it remain. It makes perfect sense to us Indians - thats why its been like this since accession.

The rest of the world will have to reconcile to this.

Your dream stories have no following in Pakistan so cut the cr@p.

Hitler use to see that he could capture the world, Japenese used to see the could kill all Chinese & occupy their land, Somalia use to see they could become Super power,etc etc, if india see IOK as their part doesn't mean it will happen.

Even after your army entered Kashmir in 47-48 you were loosing & then begged UN to intervene.

Yes it may make perfect sense only to indians just like it make perfect sense, india is supa pawa in india.

 

[Bang Galore]

What you indians don't realise is that in 65 war Pakistan has liberated many parts of Kashmir whereas india did a clear violation & attacked Pakistan crossing legally marked borders gaining few areas in Punjab & Sind, even when Pakistan had almost no army force in Punjab at the start of war still it had pushed indian forces not only back into their territory but capturing few parts also. Later at Tashkent deal, Pakistan & india both agreed to move to pre-65 controlled areas. 48 is visible victory even now, 7 districts of Kashmir are called Azad Kashmir.

This is so funny. If you start a war, don't expect your enemy to play by your rules. If you launched an attack in 1965 in Kashmir, it was mighty foolish & stupid of your planners to assume that the enemy will do what they want them to do. Little wonder that some of you end up being the butt of jokes. If this is the level of intellect among the educated, you chaps have a serious problem.

IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is not part of india it is Occupied territory & disputed, so rest all your post makes no sense.

It is part of India, what you think is irrelevant. If tomorrow we decide that Baluchistan is disputed, will it suddenly cease to be a part of Pakistan? Only when a territory is separated from a country that claims it, can you argue that it is not part of that country. Until then, it simply matters not what you think. India considers the part of Kashmir administered by it as Indian territory & any transgression will be dealt with accordingly, regardless of the expectation of the enemy.

 

[third eye]

Your dream stories have no following in Pakistan so cut the cr@p.

Hitler use to see that he could capture the world, Japenese used to see the could kill all Chinese & occupy their land, Somalia use to see they could become Super power,etc etc, if india see IOK as their part doesn't mean it will happen.

Even after your army entered Kashmir in 47-48 you were loosing & then begged UN to intervene.

Yes it may make perfect sense only to indians just like it make perfect sense, india is supa pawa in india.

I am still waiting to know of the areas ' liberated' in 65 .

There is no ' if ' as regards to J&K ( and NOT Kashmir) being India.

It already is !! Notice ?

The examples given of hitler etc are out of context - J&K is India for 60+ years.

Dont worry, you'll get over it.

 

[American Pakistani]

This is so funny. If you start a war, don't expect your enemy to play by your rules. If you launched an attack in 1965 in Kashmir, it was mighty foolish & stupid of your planners to assume that the enemy will do what they want them to do. Little wonder that some of you end up being the butt of jokes. If this is the level of intellect among the educated, you chaps have a serious problem.

It was sad part of Pakistan's planners that they thought india of a country of civilised world.

It is part of India, what you think is irrelevant. If tomorrow we decide that Baluchistan is disputed, will it suddenly cease to be a part of Pakistan? Only when a territory is separated from a country that claims it, can you argue that it is not part of that country. Until then, it simply matters not what you think. India considers the part of Kashmir administered by it as Indian territory & any transgression will be dealt with accordingly, regardless of the expectation of the enemy.

Firstly Balochistan is an offtopic. Secondly Balochistan's majority population had & wants to live with Pakistan. Few rich sardars doesn't want to. Thirdly Balochistan is legally & accepted part of Pakistan by UN & whole world. Balochistan can be compare to Tamil ettas, Mughalistan etc whereas Kashmir is disputed area by UN & whole world.

 

[American Pakistani]

I am still waiting to know of the areas ' liberated' in 65 .

There is no ' if ' as regards to J&K ( and NOT Kashmir) being India.

It already is !! Notice ?

The examples given of hitler etc are out of context - J&K is India for 60+ years.

Dont worry, you'll get over it.

I'm not wasting time to tell you go read Pakistan sources.

Yes because IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is illegally occupied territory & disputed.

Is it really?

IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is Occupied for 60+ years still isn't settled.

I wanna post a link for that but Mods will be angry.

 

[third eye]

I'm not wasting time to tell you go read Pakistan sources.
I wouldnt waste my time if you did.

Yes because IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is illegally occupied territory & disputed.

Is it really?

IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is Occupied for 60+ years still isn't settled.

I wanna post a link for that but Mods will be angry.

I am still waiting to know what parts of J&K were liberated in 65 .

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

Which parts of J&K were ' liberated' in 65 other than Chamb where the IA fell back from ??? Pak reached almost upto Akhnoor & fell back when pressure was put on Lahore.

India sees J&K as India. Therefore if India is attacked it reserves the perogative to counter attack at any place of its chosing - some thing Pak learnt the hard way.

As regards 48, India couldnt have stepped in till Hari Singh signed on the dotted line. India does not covet what Pak has - no anymore now. Pak is welcome to the 7 distts.

J&K is India and so shall it remain. It makes perfect sense to us Indians - thats why its been like this since accession.

The rest of the world will have to reconcile to this.

Except that when you force your views on somebody, a whole people, that's tyranny; then it's irony when you claim to be a democracy. You also conveniently forgot to mention how the Northern Areas liberated themselves.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

No Pakistan doesn't need india, it is like saying Somalia belongs to great britain, both different race, culture, history, etc etc.





Pakistan has never attacked india, Kashmir is not india & is occupied territory, so your post is total B.S.

Ur post is being total BS.. Now u say, india and pakistan have no cultural affinities.. But in any cultural thread or IVC threads, i find pakistanis saying " we were same till 1947, but not now" kinda posts...
Regarding 2nd part... Is pakistan on Mars? Everytime pakistan have been the aggressor starting the war... Operation Gibraltor failed and u had to start war UNNECESSARILY....
Whateva u say, kashmir might have been completely settled in 1947, in full favour of pakistan, if it had waited...
But the greed of land was too much for pakistani leaders to wait patiently.. By allowing tribals to invade kashmir (when standstill agreement with pakistan was in force) and Jinnah publicly asking British general to aid tribals(which he refused), it made maharaja hari Singh to sign the Accession to India...
Pakistanis alone are to have the blame for it... Now its 60 years plus, and u cannot do or cry anything about it,,.. kashmir will be india's whatever u say...

 

[American Pakistani]

Ur post is being total BS.. Now u say, india and pakistan have no cultural affinities.. But in any cultural thread or IVC threads, i find pakistanis saying " we were same till 1947, but not now" kinda posts...
Regarding 2nd part... Is pakistan on Mars? Everytime pakistan have been the aggressor starting the war... Operation Gibraltor failed and u had to start war UNNECESSARILY....
Whateva u say, kashmir might have been completely settled in 1947, in full favour of pakistan, if it had waited...
But the greed of land was too much for pakistani leaders to wait patiently.. By allowing tribals to invade kashmir (when standstill agreement with pakistan was in force) and Jinnah publicly asking British general to aid tribals(which he refused), it made maharaja hari Singh to sign the Accession to India...
Pakistanis alone are to have the blame for it... Now its 60 years plus, and u cannot do or cry anything about it,,.. kashmir will be india's whatever u say...

Dumb guy Pakistan have different culture from india, our culture is Sufiesm which is being followed long before your great great grand parents came to this world. In IVC threads no one said Pakistan & india were same till 47, we said that only during Mughul rule & British rule they forcefully make it as one country.

Rest all of your post is utternonsense & B.S, same old parrot story coming from indians again & again.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

Dumb guy Pakistan have different culture from india, our culture is Sufiesm which is being followed long before your great great grand parents came to this world. In IVC threads no one said Pakistan & india were same till 47, we said that only during Mughul rule & British rule they forcefully make it as one country.

Rest all of your post is utternonsense & B.S, same old parrot story coming from indians again & again.

Even before PBUH great great grandfathers came, my forefathers have been following the same culture Mr.Dumb...
Y dont u care to reply my second half of message?

 

[Ammyy]

I'm not wasting time to tell you go read Pakistan sources.

Yes because IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is illegally occupied territory & disputed.

IOK/Maqbooza Kashmir is Occupied for 60+ years still isn't settled.

I wanna post a link for that but Mods will be angry.

I love the way you people laughing on your self

60+ years are kashmir still belongs to India ... and always will

 

[American Pakistani]

Even before PBUH great great grandfathers came, my forefathers have been following the same culture Mr.Dumb...
Y dont u care to reply my second half of message?

I can do same favour to your religion but i won't cuz our religion doesn't teach us to do so, same can't be said for you.

lolgreat going after borrowing name from Sind/Indus now you want our culture also. wow, priceless

Because your second part has been addressed severl zillions times but your indian education has done deep effects to your brains & you guys keep on bringing same f@rt story again n again.

I love the way you people laughing on your self

60+ years are kashmir still belongs to India ... and always will

we laughing on delusional indians who think they can occupy Kashmir forever.

60+years Kashmir still fights to get right of self determination even when india tried military oppression.

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

I can do same favour to your religion but i won't cuz our religion doesn't teach us to do so, same can't be said for you.

lolgreat going after borrowing name from Sind/Indus now you want our culture also. wow, priceless

Because your second part has been addressed severl zillions times but your indian education has done deep effects to your brains & you guys keep on bringing same f@rt story again n again.



we laughing on delusional indians who think they can occupy Kashmir forever.

60+years Kashmir still fights to get right of self determination even when india tried military oppression.

My Indian books never dealt with situations i posted above.. Jinnah was always shown in respective manner... I had to study this from internet out of ma love of history...
After all Indians are not murderers of history like pakistanis, who take inheritence from murderers and invaders, and also from local culture when u want...
Regarding the kashmir Question, u can do all fun u want... Cos i am really glad, u are not able to answer that with ur straight face, Mr.Internet warrior...

And secondly, u started the terrorisn in kashmir and u are reaping the benefits everyday...
As u sow, so shall u reap..
even for 600 years kashmir will be with us...
Now Change ur diapers and sleep .. Kashmiris have been progressing with the rest of the country well... The main problems are with just 2 districts, which can be controlled soon through development projects..

 

[Ammyy]

we laughing on delusional indians who think they can occupy Kashmir forever.

60+years Kashmir still fights to get right of self determination even when india tried military oppression.

Yes you can laugh .... lol

Your elders watched same dream ... dnt worry you will also pass this dream to your children and this chain will never gonna break