But, sir your constitution doesn't provide the right for 'Self determination' and 'Succession' - Which are fundamental human rights by birth. How do you make a choice between denying your fellow citizens their Bhagwan given right to Self determination & Succession , and enforcing by armed lethal force, a constitution upon them which many of them don't bear allegiance to? - Please make me understand how do you make that distinction and how is it justifiable?
origins of self determination, succession, Armed rebellions originates from discontent from the governing body and in some cases state sponsored insurgencies. For the discontent of folks, talks and amalgamation in society will solve the problem, for internal armed rebellions, the once that can be drawn into negotiations shoul be negotiated with, the ones that cant might rest in peace or pieces.
whereas armed rebellion sponsored by foreign state will stand against the national security and will jeopardize national security and security, hence needs to be terminated with extreme prejudice.
distinction:
maoists leaders that are basically goons trying to exploit the tribals into submission - 7.62 x 39
Maoist cadre brainwashed into believing that exploitations by some greedy people reflects the entire nations rhetoric- Talks and rehabilitate
Kashmiri Separatists that are bombing that are insuinating violence against the state - 7.62 x 39
Kashmiris who are brainwashed by these leaders - Talks and rehabilitate in society
Foriegn Mercenaries - one way ticket to paradise.
that should be the brief distinction
