What's new

Kashmir; Aggressive diplomacy begining to have its effects

eliminating support from support from across the Pakistani border.
India till date has never presented any evidence that can be accepted on an international arena with regards to this.

instead of 'aggressive diplomacy' the title should be 'aggressive mud slinging'. Because all those, including Imran Khan who allege atrocities and human rights violations at the same breadth complain against the complete blockade of communications. So how do they know what's going there?

This mud slinging was combined to some effect with the hiring of the lobbying firm Holland & Knight, did get them some press and even had a couple congressmen speak out of turn. Hopefully the general public in the US and in INdia can see through this charade
What did IK do? He didn't pass any law against minorities....so kindly stop derailing the thread
 
.
So what has Pakistan achieved by diplomatically highlighting the issue of Kashmir issue like never before???


Kashmir_Reuters-1200x600.jpg


A Kashmiri woman walks through an empty street in Anchar neighbourhood during restrictions, in Srinagar.
Photo: Reuters/Danish Siddiqui/File Photo

POLITICS
The Siege in Kashmir Is Damaging India’s Image Abroad
Foreign governments are aware of the disconnect between independent media’s reportage on conditions in Kashmir and Delhi’s narrative.

dNc4OOx2_400x400.jpg

Sushil Aaron
DIPLOMACY
POLITICS
10/OCT/2019
The world will not care about what India does in Kashmir. That seemed to be the key assumption of the Narendra Modi government (and its supporters) when it set out to change Kashmir’s special status and impose a communications blockade on the Valley. The belief was that India’s stature as a big market for weapons, goods and services would elicit no more than murmurs abroad – contracts always trounce ethics in a Realist universe, we are often told.

That view is now coming unstuck as criticism from foreign leaders and the international media is gathering momentum. The US political class is resolutely getting involved, notwithstanding Modi’s rally in Houston with President Donald Trump or foreign minister S. Jaishankar’s recent briefings to think-tank and policy elites in Washington and New York.

The House Foreign Affairs Committee issued a strong tweet on the impact of the communications blackout and asked India to lift restrictions. The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee flagged the humanitarian crisis in Kashmir in one of its reports and US Senator Chris Van Hollen has questioned why he was denied permission to visit Kashmir. Leading Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren shared an article titled ‘Two months of misery in Indian Kashmir’, expressing her concern and saying the rights of the people of Kashmir must be respected. The US State Department mentions Kashmir as a topic of discussion in its readout of recent meetings with the Indian side.

Also read: Home Ministry Believes in Internet Ban, Mass Detention But Not in Paperwork

Other nations have joined in too. The Chinese envoy in Pakistan said his country will stand by Islamabad in comments related to Kashmir, and Beijing has in a joint statement with Pakistan referred to Kashmir as a dispute that should be resolved “based on the UN Charter, relevant UN Security Council resolutions and bilateral agreements”. Prominent leaders in Muslim-majority nations have spoken out, such as Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Delhi is trying to manage the blowback by announcing that tourists can return to Kashmir starting this week but how many visitors there will be and how they can manage without mobile and internet services remains unclear. It’s also not clear when political leaders will be released or when the curfew will be relaxed.

Regardless of how things pan out, the crisis has already significantly damaged India’s and Modi’s reputation abroad. Foreign governments will be aware of the disconnect between independent media’s reportage on conditions in Kashmir and Delhi’s narrative.

Also read: The Stories of Yawar Ahmed Bhat

India has been maintaining its all-is-well spin for two months, while an entire generation of politicians and activists are under arrest, children incarcerated, youth tortured and the public denied access to doctors, schools and jobs. Jaishankar offered a progressive gloss on changes to Kashmir’s status, telling audiences in Washington that recent measures would confer rights under the Indian constitution that they were hitherto being denied. He entirely passed over the fact that Kashmiris are being denied the right to assemble and speak on a matter concerning their future – and that Kashmir was being turned into an “open air detention centre”, as The Economist put it, while the Indian government was flying in liberalism along with thousands of fresh troops.

howdy-modi-pti-1.jpg

Indian PM Narendra Modi and US president Donald Trump at the ‘Howdy Modi’ event, Sunday, September 22, 2019. Photo: PTI/PIB

Jaishankar has also floated a literal reading of Article 370 arguing that because the word “temporary” was in the Article, India was free to change it. “By any standards, 70 years is a long definition of that term,” he wrote in the Financial Times last month. This argument has since been debunked. Historian Srinath Raghavan, a leading authority on India’s international relations, has in a public lecture of piercing clarity busted the myths and claims of the government and the Indian Right.

He notes that Article 370 was “temporary” for two reasons: one that J&K’s own constituent assembly was to decide which provisions of the Indian Constitution the state wanted to adopt beyond the three subjects of accession and, two, it was temporary in relation to the conduct of a plebiscite that was to decide the future of Kashmir, which the government of India “had committed” to. In other words, Kashmir’s special status was contingent on anticipated political processes at that stage, not simply a function of time as the government now seems to be arguing.

Also read: Jammu and Kashmir Police Has Violated the JJ Act in Detaining Children

Raghavan also points out that Article 370 remains in the constitution and has not been revoked for doing so would make Article 1, which defines the Indian union, inapplicable to the state. This underlines that India and Jammu and Kashmir continue to be legally conjoined via Article 370 even if the latter is “hollowed out”. Such textured readings of history will, in times ahead, cascade through world capitals and undercut India’s arguments further.

The situation in Kashmir has also firmly brought into focus the wider decline of democracy in India and has garnered Modi a lot of unhelpful coverage. His US trip may have been hailed as a success by the Indian media but he has been subject to scathing commentary abroad. The New York Times, Washington Post and other publications have published several news and opinion pieces critical of Modi’s record. Pratap Bhanu Mehta expounded on the “gutting” of India’s democracy in Foreign Affairs. An Indian-American student published a piece in CNN arguing that Modi and Trump were two sides of the same coin. The Guardian published a letter by academics arguing against the Gates Foundation award to Modi. Gloria Steinem, the feminist icon, and philosopher Akeel Bilgrami also wrote a column deploring the Foundation’s award for Modi.

The result of all this is that Modi has been implanted afresh among readers of international media and the global left as an illiberal figure in the league of Vladimir Putin of Russia, Viktor Orban of Hungary and Erdogan in Turkey. Whatever distance and immunity he secured from the 2002 Gujarat riots after becoming prime minister has now been lost owing to the relentless anti-Muslim posturing of his party and the situation in Kashmir.

Also read: ‘Graves Don’t Lie’: Srinagar Family Rubbishes Govt Report Denying Their Son’s Death

Looking ahead, the international climate is unlikely to get any friendlier for Modi. There is no telling which way the US presidential election will go, given the impeachment proceedings against Trump. In the event someone like Elizabeth Warren becomes president – one can anticipate that the administration will be forced to move leftward by younger politicians like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (‘AOC’), Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and others. This has implications both for Modi and the Indian diaspora that backs him in the US. Those like AOC, who has already tweeted about Kashmir, will likely step up their rhetoric in the near future if the situation persists or worsens. It’s worth noting that other figures like Omar and Tlaib have issued statements of support for Kashmir, as has Bernie Sanders.

All this can draw Indian-American supporters of Modi more and more into the glare of the liberal establishment in the months to come. These can generate undesirable consequences given that Modi supporters in the US and elsewhere are known to pushback aggressively against left-wing activism, often indulging in hate speech directed at liberal US-based academics. Given the experience of AOC and others, a Democrat administration is likely to take online abuse more seriously and it is not inconceivable that zealous Indian Americans also come up for scrutiny from law enforcement authorities in the process.

Watch: Kashmir Today is Like The Emergency

To frame it differently, a post-Trump world will potentially bring on a regime of inquiry into right-wing networks via the lens of understanding how platforms like Facebook enable political manipulation. An American establishment peering into the interplay of politics and technology from a liberal vantage can be a very different proposition for Modi and his supporters at home and abroad, especially if Kashmir continues to be on the boil.

Modi is thus in a difficult situation on several fronts, despite his dominance in India’s political sphere. He is not able to persuade Trump to isolate Pakistan and appears unsighted about the possibility of Democrats coming to power in Washington. He is neither winning the public diplomacy battle on Kashmir now nor is he likely to in the future. He cannot rollback the changes to Kashmir’s status for fear of alienating his base nor can he ease the armed presence to placate international opinion, for that will unleash unrest in the Valley.

The world hasn’t yet heard from Kashmiris and their stories will last far longer than the current blockade. No prime minister since the Emergency has faced this kind of international scrutiny – and Indians in general have scarcely faced questions about their ethical disposition and fair-mindedness earlier, committed as they seemed to pluralism and diversity. The siege of Kashmir is thus, unbeknownst to much of Indian media, accumulating its own wave of perceptual and political effects for India.

The temptation in such circumstances is to stick with hardline policies in Kashmir. It looks like only the Supreme Court can undo the mess the political leadership has created by ruling against the August 5 changes.
 
.
India till date has never presented any evidence that can be accepted on an international arena with regards to this.


What did IK do? He didn't pass any law against minorities....so kindly stop derailing the thread

Actually it has been formally proven and placement in the grey list for terror financing and monely laundering failures was one of the verdicts.

What did IK do? he has been talking up a storm alleging atrocities even as communication has been blocked out - so how does he know anything? He had to do this for his domestic audience of course but elsehwhere he just came of too shrill due to lack of any actual substance

You are some devious RSS goon to play a victim of mudslinging here.

This is the truth that puts to shame RSS supporter maggots here trying to justify Indian Occupation, ethnic cleansing and efforts to change the demography of Kashmir to subjugate the Muslim majority as it stands today.

@waz @The Eagle @Dubious @Khafee @ghazi52 @IceCold @Mangus Ortus Novem @PakSword @Signalian @Path-Finder @ps3linux @Reddington @Verve
Here is one voice of the truth like many others that mainstream Indian media does not cover but such sane voice are coming out from India :


my question has been very simple and you just keep obfuscating with random clippings. There has been a communication block out from Kashmir, so how do you, Imran Khan and anyone else know there are atrocities going on there? when you slander someone without underlying evidence that's called mud-slinging.
 
.
.
@Mangus Ortus Novem
Mangus Ortus Novem said:
@Shane @PakSword @Verve @ps3linux

WE cann't trust these Gangufied, IoJK-sellers, these sarkari Muslims... they have blood of PakKashmiris on their hands.

Let us NEVER be misled by their tweets or their statements... all are designed to garner respect/legitimacy among PakKashmiris in occupied JK.

These are all scripted and designed from day 1!

All those house arrests are/were for show.... on flip of dime these same 'KashmiriLeaders' will be yapping Tarrorisht, Tarrorisht... and blaming Pakistan as always.

We stand with PakKashmiris not with these 'Gangufied, paid Leaders"


Sir they are in the same league as Master Tara Singh, Hasrat Mohani, Attaullah Bokhari misleading the nation for petty monetary gains.

I would agree that Pakistan is using the same tactics as the Indians used after "Mumbai Attacks", and labelling "Modi" as new hitler or RSS as the new face of fascism.

Perception about India has started to slightly change, of course due to economic concerns it will take a longer while if we keep at it consistently.

IK's mention that when two nuclear armed nations take a dig at war the repercussion are not limited to their countries only has certainly been noted by at-least some fund managers in wall street. Few friends from there have informed me that they have started to raise the risk level for India as well particularly when it is observed in conjunction with india's ailing economy, if the ball keeps rolling well let see I see interesting times ahead.:azn:

In another thread gangustani/bhindians got the proverbial on fire after my post, without reading my signature one of them actually two disgusting things went to to quote/requote without understanding that I have always avoided their kind as one would avoid animal poop while walking down a road.
 
.
Actually it has been formally proven and placement in the grey list for terror financing and monely laundering failures was one of the verdicts.
Never proven.
Mostly based on cries of a few....

What did IK do? he has been talking up a storm alleging atrocities even as communication has been blocked out - so how does he know anything? He had to do this for his domestic audience of course but elsehwhere he just came of too shrill due to lack of any actual substance
He is not Modi nor are we modi supporters. We don't give votes based on what will happen to our neighbour.
 
.
Never proven.
Mostly based on cries of a few....


He is not Modi nor are we modi supporters. We don't give votes based on what will happen to our neighbour.

FATF verdict wasn't just proof, it was and is binding remedial requirement. there's no denying that and you know it.
 
.
. .
17 October 2019
Losing Kashmir
Modi has gambled, and he may have lost!

BY AMIT SENGUPTA


GettyImages-1164777798.jpg


On Monday, for the first time in ten weeks, cell phones worked in Srinagar. Networks had been shut down as part of a full-scale communications blackout and military occupation of Kashmir ordered by India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi.

Why this story?
The world’s attention is on northern Syria, but the risk of a major war is as acute in the confrontation between India and Pakistan in Kashmir.

In those ten weeks, thousands of Muslim Kashmiri activists and politicians have been detained. Hundreds have been moved to prisons far from Kashmir, while normal life in their towns and villages has been brought to a standstill by day and night curfews and razor wire.

Teenage boys have been taken from their homes at the dead of night. Stories of children shot by police with special pellet guns go largely unreported in India but are all too true.


There are two ways of looking at Kashmir’s latest emergency. The more charitable one is that Modi has sought to move the goalposts in a 70-year-old conflict with a view to ending it, creating two new federal territories – one Hindu, one Muslim – directly controlled by Delhi.

GettyImages-1162631852.jpg

An injured Kashmir protester in hospital during the curfew in Srinagar
The worldlier view is that Modi is fanning the flames of Hindu nationalism with a manufactured crisis in which the news blackout has meant a widening gulf between mainstream Indian perceptions of what is happening, and a tense and lethal reality.


That reality includes running battles between Indian troops and Islamist militants across the disputed Line Of Control between India and Pakistan. Civilians are constantly at risk. Al Jazeera reported that three were killed, including two children, on Tuesday alone.

Two of India’s three wars with Pakistan started in Kashmir. The question now is whether a fourth is avoidable.

I gained access to the region with the photographer Aritra Bhattacharya a month into the blackout.
The military clampdown was evident on every street of Srinagar. Shops were shut, doctors were unable to open their clinics and the local economy was collapsing. Ripe apples, pears and walnuts waited to be packed as government hospitals and schools stood empty. People stayed at home protecting their food supplies while security forces in camouflage and armoured vehicles stalked the city.

“If this is not a military occupation, what is it?” a local journalist asked.

This state of suspended animation began on 4 August, when Modi’s government abrogated Article 370 of the Indian constitution, stripping Kashmir of much of its autonomy.

GettyImages-1159685104.jpg

Indian paramilitary troopers stand guard at a roadblock at Maisum, in Srinagar
In Muslim-majority areas this made non-Muslim Indians the enemy. “Please go back and write that all we want is azaadi (freedom),” one old man said to me.

Indian journalists are hated in Kashmir because their coverage tends to repeat the propaganda of the ruling nationalist party, the BJP. Its message is that everything is normal in Kashmir, but the truth is otherwise.

Anchaar and Saura, not far from Downtown Srinagar, is a “liberated zone”. No Kashmiris from Uptown go there for fear their cars will be smashed. Even local Kashmiri journalists are not invited and the army dare not enter.

The entire area has been barricaded by the locals. Huge holes have been dug in the streets and backstreets. Major roads are blocked. Most days are quiet, but young men in groups patrol the area all night. One Friday, early in the lockdown, protests erupted in which more than 200 people were hit by pellet guns. Reports said 80 children were among those hurt.

Kashmir diary
August 5
My internet stopped working at midnight – confirmation of what until then had been rumors. The internet has always been the first casualty when the Indian government wants to contain information in Kashmir. Minutes later, my phone signal went and the landline dropped dead.

Pharmacies across Kashmir are open for a couple of hours a day. Most private hospitals are shut. The pregnant sister of a fellow reporter lost her baby because a gynaecologist could not be contacted by mobile or landline
. An 85-year-old man died because he was hit by a car on the road. He was picked up by neighbours, but their vehicle was stopped so often that by the time it reached the hospital he was dead. There are so many similar stories that one Kashmiri woman accused the government of “organised murder”.

GettyImages-1171529228.jpg

Kashmiri protesters burn the Indian Flag during protests after Friday prayers in Srinagar
We were told that at least 4,000 people have been arrested in the Valley, including mainstream politicians and former senior ministers, many of whom have been detained in the five-star Centaur Hotel near Srinagar’s Dal Lake – an eerie echo of the 2017 imprisonment of Saudi notables in the Riyadh Ritz Carlton.

Most disconcerting are the midnight-raids. Scores of young boys and men have been picked up by police and reportedly sent to jails in other states including Uttar Pradesh. Anyone can be picked up in the night and charged under the draconian Public Safety Act with no requirement for a trial or judicial accountability. The fear is palpable, but it is not necessarily driving Kashmiris towards Pakistan.

“We want to live in Indian democracy,” a local Shia leader told me in Lal Bazar during the festival of Moharram. “So why is India losing Kashmir with this mindless oppression? We are secular. We want dialogue and progress. We want good business and the local economy to flourish. We want our children in schools and our women safe on the streets. We want peace.”

There seems little chance of that, especially if the reopening of cellphone networks makes it easier to organise mass protests and resistance. Police are bracing for the worst. One senior officer told me bluntly: “India has lost Kashmir.”

@Mangus Ortus Novem the last few highlights and the bold parts...really interesting read.
 
.
Shaheed Burhan Wani R.A. has given the Gift of Freedom to PakKashmiris with His Blood.

#KashmirIsPakistan
#PakistanIsKashmir

@Shane my dearest YoungPak, my PakBrother, may Allah bless you with all His Blessings... for keeping the Voice of PakKashmiris alive here on PDF.

My thanks and tributes to @Shane and to you @Mangus Ortus Novem, for keeping us aware of what is going on in IoJK.

"Khud bakhud toot kay girti naheen zanjeer kabhi
Badli jaati hae, badalti naheen taqdeer kabhi
Rang laaye ga shaheedon ka lahoo
Ye lahoo surkhi hae azadi kay afsaanay ki"

خودبخود ٹوٹ کے گرتی نہیں زنجیر کبھی
بدلی جاتی ھے بدلتی نہیں تقدیر کبھی
رنگ لائے گا شہیدوں کا لہو
یہ لہو سرخی ھے آزادی کے افسانے کی
 
Last edited:
.
Gandhi_thinking_mood_1931-870x600.jpg

Gandhi Photo: Wikimedia Commons

HISTORY
When Gandhi Argued in Favour of Kashmir's Right to Self-Determination

"The people of Kashmir should be asked whether they want to join Pakistan or India. Let them do as they want."

wire-logo.png

The Wire Staff
HISTORY
RIGHTS
23 HOURS AGO

The Wire brings you a short excerpt from Gandhi’s prayer discourse of July 29, 1947, from The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Volume 88, as published online by the Gandhi Heritage Portal.

§

Kashmir has a Maharaja and also the subjects of the Maharaja. I am not going to suggest to the Maharaja to accede to India and not to Pakistan. This is not my intention. The real sovereign of the State are the people of the State. If the ruler is not the servant of the people then he is not the ruler. This is my belief and that is why I became a rebel because the British claimed to be the rulers of India and I refused to recognise them as rulers. Now they are about to leave India…

So long the Maharaja of Kashmir could do as he liked under the protection of the Viceroy. Now the power belongs to the people…In Kashmir shawl-making, embroidery, etc., are well-developed handicrafts. The charkha has also done good work there. The poor people of Kashmir know me.

The people of Kashmir should be asked whether they want to join Pakistan or India. Let them do as they want. The ruler is nothing. The people are everything. The ruler will be dead one of these days but the people will remain.

 
.
Gandhi_thinking_mood_1931-870x600.jpg

Gandhi Photo: Wikimedia Commons

HISTORY
When Gandhi Argued in Favour of Kashmir's Right to Self-Determination

"The people of Kashmir should be asked whether they want to join Pakistan or India. Let them do as they want."

wire-logo.png

The Wire Staff
HISTORY
RIGHTS
23 HOURS AGO

The Wire brings you a short excerpt from Gandhi’s prayer discourse of July 29, 1947, from The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Volume 88, as published online by the Gandhi Heritage Portal.

§

Kashmir has a Maharaja and also the subjects of the Maharaja. I am not going to suggest to the Maharaja to accede to India and not to Pakistan. This is not my intention. The real sovereign of the State are the people of the State. If the ruler is not the servant of the people then he is not the ruler. This is my belief and that is why I became a rebel because the British claimed to be the rulers of India and I refused to recognise them as rulers. Now they are about to leave India…

So long the Maharaja of Kashmir could do as he liked under the protection of the Viceroy. Now the power belongs to the people…In Kashmir shawl-making, embroidery, etc., are well-developed handicrafts. The charkha has also done good work there. The poor people of Kashmir know me.

The people of Kashmir should be asked whether they want to join Pakistan or India. Let them do as they want. The ruler is nothing. The people are everything. The ruler will be dead one of these days but the people will remain.

@Shane , please stop clutching at straws man. It is embarrassing
 
. .
How the dimwitted nin com poops supporters of RSS keep pointing figures elsewhere to divert attention from Hindutva Champions Wagging the Dog i.e. India as in slum dwelling millions of voters... to vote for Modi, why?

screenshot_2019-10-23-01-18-00-1-png.585579
 
.
Back
Top Bottom