I'm sorry, but I am sick of the parallels being drawn between 26/11 and this and by extension India and Pakistan. 26/11 is an entirely separate case where ti has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt the perpetrators were Pakistani, were trained in Paksitan, launched from Paksitan and were controlled from Pakistan. Of course I don't expect many Pakistanis to accept this but the world does (even your own govt) and that is good enough for me.
You can't compare India being the victim of terror to Pakistan being the main hub/exporter of terror. It was an ACTIVE policy by your establishment to create and nurture unconventional forces to bleed India dry, whether this is still the case is another argument. India has never had this sort of terror infrastructure in place to use against Pakistan, I'm not even going to claim this is because India is the more morally superior nation but mostly because India has the clear conventional military edge that it doesn't need to seek to undermine Pakistan like this.
Anyway the jump that was made in India even during the 26/11 event to claim Pakistan as the likely culprit is perfectly logical as there is precedent- 1993 bomb blasts, 2001 Parliament attacks, Pak involvement to this day in sending terrorists into India through Kashmir and even ISI support for the Khalistan movement in the 80s. Yes, I see a lot of Pakistani members like to claim an Indian hand in Balouchastan but there is zero credible evidence for this. As such it is a perfectly fair assumption to have made during the audacious 26/11 attacks had a Paksitani hand in them and this was proven to be 100% true. I'm not going to say every single act of terror in India is the result of a Pakistani hand, most of the smaller acts of terror are homegrown and this most security agencies in India will freely admit. But even during and after Mehran and Kamra an Indian (foreign but this was often implied to be India) was speculated by many Pakistanis but this has never even remotely been proven or taken up at a govt level. if there was any truth to it the GoP would surely have asked for the wrongdoers in India to be prosecuted like the senior leadership in India has constantly asked the Paksitani side to do on the accused in 26/11. In no act of terror in Pakistan has the preverbal smoking gun been found to hint at Indian involvement but in almost every large scale act of terror in India there has been proof of Pakistani involvement.
I and the world need proof. If you as the Head of RAW or the COAS they will give you a detailed map of Paksitani terror camps aimed at India ( I think the last count was 42) in "Azad" Kashmir, ask any Paksitani to do the same and they'll say "something something Afghanistan, consulates blah blah blah"
The simple fact is that the homegrown terror groups in India don't have the capacity to launch a large-scale attack in India but the same is not true for the home-grown elements in Pakistani who DO have the capacity to commit such large scale attacks in Pakistani and have proven this again and again- Mehran, Kamra, KIA, GHQ, Red Mosque etc
The fallacy that many Pakistanis hold is that India is just like Pakistan in every way and its tactics and thus that because they have a hand in terror in India the reverse must be true also. But India is a very different country than Pakistan and in India there Military and Intel agencies don't have a free hand and are 100% subservient to the civilian leadership.
short of saying they control your minds that was amusing list to read....
