Just in: India's Nirbhay cruise missile blasts off from Integrated Test Range, Odisha. Details await

[Zee-shaun]

Phir se fail ho gaya?
Naya record banayega kya?

 

[ashok321]

 

[ejaz007]

HN-1B is identical to Babur in every aspect, Babur is nothing but HN-1B

pakistani and its nation has always been behind India in each and every sector of science and technology.

pakistan's newest ballistic missile Shaheen-3 is not even canisterised

pakistan cannot even launch a 20 kg satellite.

Not just that pakistan is unable to build even a 10 km range surface to air missiles

pakistan aviation is so backward that they cannot even build a two seat helicopter.

Being identical means the missile is a copy. Great logic.

 

[Dean Winchester]

Being identical means the missile is a copy. Great logic.

Well Babur has the exact same dimensions and performance as the HN-1B.

 

[WaLeEdK2]

Well Babur has the exact same dimensions and performance as the HN-1B.

If you want to compare it to something compare it to the tomahawk. In the late 90's tomahawks crashed in Pakistan. Pakistani scientists studied it to the core and probably gave China some information as well.

 

[Dean Winchester]

If you want to compare it to something compare it to the tomahawk. In the late 90's tomahawks crashed in Pakistan. Pakistani scientists studied it to the core and probably gave China some information as well.

Pakistanis were unable to get anything useful from the tomahawks as most of its electronics as well as its engines were burnt in the crash as the tomahawk mainly crashed due to a short circuiy fire in the rear equipment cabin causing it to plummet head first to ground destroying its guidance cibtrol section even though the midsection of airframe remained intact, Babur is directly Chinese HN-1B which itself is reverse engineered Ukrainian KH-65SE, which Ukraine admitted selling to China & Iran in 1999-01.

 

[graphican]

View attachment 362354

Failures are not those who try and fail, but those who claim to develop "State of the art of every freaking thing" and fail and never stop failing ever after.

On a soft note, I imagine this is the creed of DRDO.

"There are more ways to fail than we know and we never stop discovering more. But there is one way to succeed and that is what we never know. Our commitment to trying is never ending and when our failures get us paid, who on earth needs to be successful. For the next state of the art thingy, our ambitions are bigger than realities and we are all up to discover a million + more failures + few more failures at your expense. Come join us, come to get paid regardless."

Proud defenders - DRDO.

 

[Dean Winchester]

Failures are not those who try and fail, but those who claim to develop "State of the art of every freaking thing" and fail and never stop failing ever after.

On a soft note, I imagine this is the creed of DRDO.

"There are more ways to fail than we know and we never stop discovering more. But there is one way to succeed and that is what we never know. Our commitment to trying is never ending and when our failures get us paid, who on earth needs to be successful. For the next state of the art thingy, our ambitions are bigger than realities and we are all to discover a million + more failures at your expense. Come join us, come to get paid regardless."

Proud defenders - DRDO.

On the other hand We have Pakistan, which hides the missile failures from it's public and even Army Generals:

Over a year earlier, on April 6, 1998, Pakistan had carried out what it described as a successful first test of the intermediate-range ballistic missile, developed by Khan Research Laboratory with North Korean assistance.
Even Musharraf, who witnessed that Ghauri launch as a local corps commander, had been led to believe it was a success then, according to the nuclear scientist, who until recently had long been closely associated with the country’s nuclear and missile programs.
The truth, he said, is that the ballistic missile failed to reach its predesignated impact point in Pakistan’s southwestern province of Baluchistan and its debris could not be found — something that would have undermined the missile’s deterrent effect if it were made public.

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/20...siles-tied-to-musharraf-blunder/#.WFqgpjNw0t8

 

[assassin123]

Hey didn't I just correct you in another thread, on why there is ramjet listed there? You are just spreading poo around the forum. The ramjet/scramjet was listed for India because of the 'in testing' scramjet for the so called spaceplane. Brahmos engine is Russian. Can you etch this in yr smart Indian brain? What do you even mean by global production hub, I only see the word production, global what? Hub what? You are just adding words to make it sound advance.


Yah another typical Indian, please read about why the MOM was started, it was a reaction to the failed Chandrayaan-1. The PSLV is old tech by Chinese standards and the MOM is just a Chandy clone. So tell me what is stopping China?

Chandrayaan1 failed?
It was the v first to find water on the moon and you called that failed
Yep China has got better rockets and a hell lot more budget to spent in space research and still has not managed to reach Mars shame on you!!
Keep trying anyways

 

[Bad Guy]

Failures are not those who try and fail, but those who claim to develop "State of the art of every freaking thing" and fail and never stop failing ever after.

Sure, just remember how badly Pakistanis used to troll us over our GSLV failures (case is different that they even not have it).

And since, it has got a string success, nobody dares to even open ISRO thread.

@waz keep an eye on this thread. You may have close it anytime.

 

[ejaz007]

Well Babur has the exact same dimensions and performance as the HN-1B.

Hong Niao Series at a Glance
Originated From: People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Possessed By: People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Alternate Name: Hongniao, Red Bird, DH-10, X-600, HN-1A, HN-1B, CJ-10, YH-4, HN-2A, HN-2B, HN-2C, HN-3A, HN-3B, HN-3C, C-602
Class: Subsonic cruise missile
Basing: Ground/ship/air/submarine-launched
Length: 6.4 m (7.2 m with boost motor)
Diameter: 0.5 m
Launch Weight: 1,200 kg
Payload: Single warhead
Warhead: 400 kg HE or submunitions, 20-90 kT nuclear
Propulsion: Turbojet (HN-1), Turbofan (HN-2/-3)
Range: 600-3000 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 1996

Hatf 7 “Babur” at a Glance
Originated From: Pakistan
Possessed By: Pakistan
Class: Subsonic Cruise Missile
Basing: Ground launched
Length: 6.2 m
Diameter: 0.52 m
Launch Weight: 1,500 kg
Payload: Single warhead, 450-500 kg, nuclear capable
Warhead: 10-35 kT nuclear, HE, submunitions
Propulsion: Turbojet
Range: 350-700 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 2010

Exact same dimensions??

 

[Dean Winchester]

Hong Niao Series at a Glance
Originated From: People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Possessed By: People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Alternate Name: Hongniao, Red Bird, DH-10, X-600, HN-1A, HN-1B, CJ-10, YH-4, HN-2A, HN-2B, HN-2C, HN-3A, HN-3B, HN-3C, C-602
Class: Subsonic cruise missile
Basing: Ground/ship/air/submarine-launched
Length: 6.4 m (7.2 m with boost motor)
Diameter: 0.5 m
Launch Weight: 1,200 kg
Payload: Single warhead
Warhead: 400 kg HE or submunitions, 20-90 kT nuclear
Propulsion: Turbojet (HN-1), Turbofan (HN-2/-3)
Range: 600-3000 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 1996

Hatf 7 “Babur” at a Glance
Originated From: Pakistan
Possessed By: Pakistan
Class: Subsonic Cruise Missile
Basing: Ground launched
Length: 6.2 m
Diameter: 0.52 m
Launch Weight: 1,500 kg
Payload: Single warhead, 450-500 kg, nuclear capable
Warhead: 10-35 kT nuclear, HE, submunitions
Propulsion: Turbojet
Range: 350-700 km
Status: Operational
In Service: 2010

Exact same dimensions??

The dimensions you gave are of X-600C which was test fired in 1996, as it did not perform well, Chinese had to wait till they got KH-65SE from Ukraine.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Timing can't be more perfect. Epic failure in D*** measuring contest, coming days after this:

 

[K210]

Yah another typical Indian, please read about why the MOM was started, it was a reaction to the failed Chandrayaan-1. The PSLV is old tech by Chinese standards and the MOM is just a Chandy clone. So tell me what is stopping China?

Chandrayaan-1 failure? Have you been living under a rock?

Chinese should be ashamed that even with greater budget and more powerful rockets than india they were beaten

 

[muhammadali233]

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=685912438240599

The video