What's new

Joe Biden elected the 46th President of the United States

Caitlin Johnstone: Biden's prospective new defense secretary is another professional war profiteer

1607519005635.png




By Caitlin Johnstone, an independent journalist based in Melbourne, Australia. Her website is here and you can follow her on Twitter @caitoz
Joe Biden’s possible new secretary of defense pick may be celebrated by the MSM, but his nomination only serves to underline the grim truth: corporations are running America’s war machine, and they’re doing it for profit.
The mass media are reporting that the Biden camp has selected former general Lloyd J. Austin III to be the next secretary of defense, assuaging fears among antiwar activists that the position would go to bloodthirsty psychopath Michele Flournoy as commonly predicted.
As has become the standard ritual for Biden's cabinet picks, the mass media are holding a parade to celebrate the fact that Austin would be the first black chief of the US war machine, while virtually ignoring the murderous agendas he has facilitated throughout his career. As head of Central Command, Austin actively campaigned to resurrect the Pentagon's spectacularly failed program of trying to arm "rebels" in Syria to fight ISIS, and in 2014 he backed immunity for US troops from war crimes prosecutions by the government of Afghanistan. He helped spearhead the Iraq invasion, and he is a member of the same private equity fund which invests in defense contractors as Flournoy and Biden's warmongering pick for secretary of state, Tony Blinken.
 
.
Senior Republican says Trump's final election challenge will ‘go down like a shot dog’

Trump continues to make baseless claims of mass electoral fraud, and has reportedly attacked both McConnell and Pence
Dusk falls over the White House in Washington DC on Monday.

Dusk falls over the White House in Washington DC on Monday. Photograph: Samuel Corum/AFP/Getty Images

Donald Trump has reportedly acknowledged in private that his attempt to overturn the election result will fail, while a senior Republican in the Senate said on Monday a challenge coming in the House of Representatives will “go down like a shot dog”.
But amid reports of a president unhinged – one report said: “We cannot stress enough how unnerved Trump officials are” – and while Trump continued to stoke a Republican civil war by attacking Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, a group of GOP representatives visited the White House to plan one final push to reverse the will of the American people.
Congress meets to validate the electoral college result, a 306-232 win for Joe Biden, on 6 January. On Monday, Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama led a delegation of about 12 Republicans to the White House, where they discussed how their challenge to that result will proceed.
“It was a back and forth concerning the planning and strategy for January the 6th,” Brooks told Politico, adding: More and more congressmen and senators are being persuaded that the election was stolen.”
There is no evidence that this is the case, and Brooks notably declined to identify any of the supposed doubters. By all the evidence, challenges to the result in the House and the Senate will not have the votes to be sustained.
On Monday, No 2 Republican senator John Thune told CNN the move was “going down like a shot dog” and added: “I just don’t think it makes a lot of sense to put everybody through this when you know what the ultimate outcome is going to be.”
Nonetheless, Trump continues to make baseless accusations of mass electoral fraud and reportedly to rage against aides he deems insufficiently zealous in his defence. According to the news site Axios, White House counsel Pat Cipollone and chief of staff Mark Meadows are prominent among such hapless targets.
So is McConnell, whom Trump claims to have saved in his re-election fight this year, the president sending a slide to Republicans in Congress which purported to show the restorative effect of a presidential tweet and robocall.
“Sadly, Mitch forgot,” the slide said. “He was the first one off the ship!”
The wisdom or otherwise of attacking the Republican Senate leader two weeks before run-off elections in Georgia that will decide control of the chamber, and with it much of Biden’s chances of legislative success, seems lost on the president for now.
Meadows was once a member of the hard-right Freedom Caucus in the House, and his former allies were among those visiting the White House on Monday. One was Jim Jordan of Ohio, a renowned attack dog so loyal to Trump that he has claimed never to have heard the president lie. (The Washington Post’s count of Trump’s lies in office stands at 26,000.) Also there was Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, an open supporter of the far-right QAnon conspiracy theory preparing to take a seat in Congress.
Mike Pence, who will preside over the joint session of Congress on 6 January, also attended the meeting.
Trump is even reported to have soured on the vice-president, his loyal lieutenant since joining the ticket in 2016. The president is reported to believe Pence is “backing away” from him – notably, a claim advanced in a recent ad by the Lincoln Project, a group of dissident Republicans.
“When Mike Pence is running away from you,” the ad says, “you know it’s over.”
The Lincoln Project ad.
Brooks said the Republicans were “trying to make sure that we understand what [Pence’s] view of the procedural requirements are, so we can comply with them. Pence will have a tremendous amount of discretion, though I think the rulings he will make will be pretty cut and dry.
“It’s still somewhat fluid, since this does not happen very often.”
Trump remains actively engaged in the fundamentally anti-democratic campaign. He is said to have spent an hour poring over the details of the 6 January session with the group from Congress.
The closer the president gets to removal from office, the more volatile he becomes, and the more wild his invective grows. According to Olivia Nuzzi of New York magazine, since election day White House aides have been “outright avoiding the president out of concern he might end up using any nearby staffer as a human stress ball”.
In a meeting at the White House last Friday, Trump is reported to have floated the idea of the arch-conspiracy theorist and lawyer Sidney Powell being appointed a special counsel to investigate voter fraud during the election.
According to the New York Times, Trump asked advisers at that gathering about whether the military could be mobilised to “rerun” the election. The idea was the brainchild of Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser pardoned by Trump for lying to the FBI, who was present at the Friday meeting.
As Trump digs himself ever further into his “stolen election” rabbit hole, other key figures in his administration are gently but firmly moving in the other direction. William Barr, the US attorney general who has been willing to accommodate many of Trump’s whims, has distanced himself.
On Monday Barr bluntly squashed the idea of a special counsel.
“If I thought a special counsel at this stage was the right tool, I would name one, but I haven’t and I’m not going to,” he said.
No. 2 GOP senator: Efforts to overturn election would 'go down like a shot dog'

By Jordain Carney - 12/21/20 11:22 PM EST 2,166


Sen. John Thune (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, warned on Monday that efforts to challenge the Electoral College vote in Congress next month would fall short in the Senate.
The GOP senator — who has publicly and privately pushed back against the effort being led by Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) — argued that it would be futile to force both chambers to vote on an objection to the Electoral College vote that is "not going anywhere."
"I mean, in the Senate, it would ... go down like a shot dog," Thune told reporters. "I just don't think it makes a lot of sense to put everybody through this when you know what the ultimate outcome is going to be."
His comments come after a group of House conservatives met with President Trump and Vice President Pence on Monday at the White House to strategize on the effort to challenge the Electoral College votes when Congress formally convenes to count and certify the votes next month.
"Big meeting today with @realDonaldTrump, @VP, the President's legal team,
@freedomcaucus and other Members of Congress. I will lead an objection to Georgia's electors on Jan 6. The courts refuse to hear the President's legal case. We're going to make sure the People can!" Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) tweeted about the meeting.
Brooks has said he's spoken with Senate Republicans who are receptive to his plan, though none have said they plan to object. Sen.-elect Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) has said he's considering it, something that earned him public praise from Trump. A group of 2024 hopefuls is also being watched closely.
Thune said on Monday that he didn't know of a GOP senator, or an incoming GOP senator, who had committed to challenging the election results on Jan. 6.
"I don't know where they're getting that. I've seen public statements from a couple of Republicans, incoming Republicans, but I don't know that anyone is committed to doing it," he said when a reporter noted that House Republicans claim that a senator supports their effort.
The push by Brooks and others to use Congress's vote to prolong the election fight has put a spotlight on divisions between House and Senate Republicans, who have made it clear they are ready to move on.
Thune, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), a member of GOP leadership and the Senate Rules Committee chairman, used a private caucus call last week to warn members of the caucus against challenging the results on Jan. 6.
Several House Republicans have said they are backing Brooks's effort, but to successfully force a debate and vote on his objection, he’ll need support from at least one GOP senator. That’s only happened twice since 1887, according to the Congressional Research Service.
If both a House member and a senator object, the two chambers would have to meet separately, debate the issue and then have a majority in both chambers vote to uphold the objection to a state’s slate. A lawmaker has never been able to successfully throw out a state's results.


 
.
Joe Biden: I've Never Been More Optimistic About America Than I Am This Very Day
Of course he's optimistic. He forgot what happened.
 
.
Congratulations to Biden and Kamila. I pray that Allah makes Pakistan successful

k
 
.
I don't like Joe Biden. He look like more dangerous than Trump
 
. . . . .
.

I have great doubts of Beijing betting on Putin now. Instead, Li Zhanshu, or possibly Zhong Shaojun has convinced Xi to hedge his bets.

If anybody noticed, Beijing has invited on its own initiative Russian prime minister for talks. Normally you don't invite a premier of a country with a presidential system for a chitchat, you either invite diplomats, or heads above the executive line.

While, per Russian constitution, a vice president is the next in line of succession if Putin dies, or is indisposed, the prime minister is effectively allowed to carry executive orders on his own, until the vice president is inaugurated.

So, if Putin kick the bucket, Russian premier has a short window in which he can both sign on an instrument of surrender, and oust any competitors out of power.
 
. .
Former U.S. General Michael Flynn has called for the removal of President Joe Biden from office, urging Vice President Kamala Harris to invoke the 25th Amendment. Flynn's comments stem from Biden's recent decision to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied ATACMS missilesfor strikes deep into Russian territory, which he claims could provoke World War III.

Key Points from Flynn's Statements:​

  • Urgent Call for Action: Flynn expressed that Biden is "sleepwalking" the nation into a potential global conflict and emphasized that the current House of Representatives should impeach him for endangering national security. He argued that Biden's actions amount to acts of war without a formal declaration, which he believes is unconstitutional.
  • Concerns Over Military Escalation: Flynn's remarks reflect growing concerns among some political figures regarding the escalation of military support to Ukraine and its implications for U.S.-Russia relations. He highlighted that Biden's approval of missile usage could lead to further military confrontations.
  • Historical Context: Flynn referenced his own experiences during the Trump administration, suggesting that incoming officials should engage with Russian President Vladimir Putin to deescalate tensions. He drew parallels between his past discussions with Russian officials and the current geopolitical climate.
  • Public Reaction: Flynn's call for Biden's removal has sparked debate, with supporters agreeing on the need for accountability, while critics argue that such actions may further polarize political discourse in an already divided environment.
This situation underscores the heightened tensions surrounding U.S. foreign policy decisions related to Ukraine and Russia, as well as the ongoing political ramifications within the U.S. as various factions respond to these developments.

1732437626228.jpeg
1732437632900.jpeg
1732437639582.jpeg
 
.
On December 1, 2024, President Joe Biden issued a full and unconditional pardon to his son, Hunter Biden, who had been convicted of federal gun and tax evasion charges. This decision marks a significant reversal from Biden's previous statements where he indicated he would not intervene in his son's legal matters.

Background on Hunter Biden's Legal Troubles​

Hunter Biden faced serious legal challenges stemming from two main cases:
  1. Gun Charges: In June 2024, Hunter was convicted on three felony counts related to the illegal purchase of a firearm. He had purchased a Colt Cobra revolver in 2018 while under the influence of crack cocaine and provided false information on the purchase form regarding his drug use. The maximum penalty for these charges could have reached up to 25 years in prison.
  2. Tax Evasion Charges: Hunter also pleaded guilty to multiple tax-related offenses, admitting to failing to pay over $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019. This case involved allegations of filing false returns and misrepresenting personal expenses as business-related to evade tax assessments. He faced a potential maximum sentence of 17 years for these offenses.

The Pardon Decision​

In a statement released from the White House, President Biden expressed that the decision to pardon Hunter was made after careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding his son's prosecution. He argued that Hunter had been "selectively and unfairly prosecuted" due to their familial relationship and emphasized that no reasonable person could conclude otherwise.
  • Biden's Statement: "From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department's decision-making, and I kept my word... No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter's cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong."
  • Political Context: The pardon comes at a politically sensitive time, as it occurs just weeks before Hunter was scheduled for sentencing on December 12 for the gun charges and December 16 for the tax charges. This timing has led to criticism from various political opponents who view the pardon as an abuse of presidential power.

Implications of the Pardon​

The issuance of this pardon raises several important considerations:
  1. Political Repercussions: The decision is likely to provoke backlash from both Republican lawmakers and some Democrats who may view it as undermining the rule of law. Critics argue that it sets a troubling precedent regarding the use of presidential powers for family members.
  2. Public Perception: The move could influence public opinion regarding both President Biden and Hunter Biden, especially as the nation remains polarized over issues related to privilege, accountability, and justice.
  3. Legal Precedents: This pardon could set a precedent for future cases involving political figures or their families, potentially leading to calls for stricter regulations on presidential pardons.
  4. Impact on Future Elections: As President Biden navigates his remaining time in office and prepares for potential political challenges ahead, including the return of Donald Trump to the political arena, this decision may play a role in shaping electoral dynamics.

Conclusion​

President Biden's decision to grant a full pardon to Hunter Biden represents a significant moment in U.S. politics, intertwining issues of family loyalty, legal accountability, and presidential authority. As reactions unfold from both sides of the political spectrum, this development will likely continue to be scrutinized in the context of broader discussions about justice and privilege in America. The implications of this pardon will resonate beyond Hunter's individual case, influencing perceptions of presidential power and its limits in future administrations.

1733121013301.png
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom