What's new

JNU is a den of organised sex racket, says dossier prepared by university teachers

Probably you should, especially if you have low esteem and could not get a girlfriend. In that case JNU would make you feel better of yourself and give you super-easy opportunities to have casual sëx.

Only people outside Delhi would be surprised at antics of JNU. People who live in Delhi know very well how JNU rolls. I even know the place where JNU students do drugs and sëx in public. It is a small hill in middle off the forest inside JNU campus. I have forgotten the name but remember the route as I have visited it a couple of times, once through main gate and another time by scaling a wall (as the Bhasha Indonesia student which was showing us around was stoned (and drunk too) and had forgotten his ID in his hostel). My College is just 500m away from JNU and we come across a lot of JNU students whenever we venture outside.

The only problem is that girls in JNU are unattractive (even if they are more available ). If you want to see pretty girls, best place is M-Block market of Grater Kailash-I followed by mostly colleges like Gargi and LSR. I am talking from South Delhi perspective as in North Delhi, most of pretty girls are in all-female colleges of DU usually doing graduation in useless subjects like English literature.


JNU is visit worthy if you want good food at low cost (Ganga dhaba) or want to score casual sëx with some stoner chick (washed, rather than the smelly dirty one you find on street). The accusation of organized sëx raket may or may not be true, but all tales of free sëx certainly are. And given that JNU students have filmed pörn in their hostel, it being true has higher probability than it being a lie.

Now here I would clarify that I have not partaken in these activities, but that is because I have better standards and capability; but if you have low standard, are desperate, and want to score with some stoned girl, be free to visit JNU. Just tag along someone from JNU and ask direction for that hill. And don't worry about place. JNU is sparsely populated and 3/4 of campus is composed of Babul and Kikar forest. You would have no problem in finding a spot (if hostel is not available).
thanks for the aweful lot of useless info. only a pimp would know better.
 
. .
Yes, you are right. Only a pimp would have known better about JNU than someone who lives in same area.

Which also explain why this information is useless to you. After all you would certainly know better.
yes, thank you. i have a job which keeps me busy most of the times. rest of the time, i follow jokers who feel "a kick" while counting used condoms.
 
.
yes, thank you. i have a job which keeps me busy most of the times. rest of the time, i follow jokers who feel "a kick" while counting used condoms.

The only ones who went to count used condoms were Liberal icons like Burkha Dutt. So no surprises there about your getting a kick from following her. The BJP minister though got his count from the condom vending machines installed in the campus, i.e. fresh packed and sealed condoms.
 
.
I wonder if any parent would be ready sent their daughter to JNU after the news coming out of that hell hole!
 
. .
The only ones who went to count used condoms were Liberal icons like Burkha Dutt. So no surprises there about your getting a kick from following her. The BJP minister though got his count from the condom vending machines installed in the campus, i.e. fresh packed and sealed condoms.
then what did they do after the count ? film the act ???
 
.
want for sex is primal instinct, it has got nothing to do with west.. people are not having casual sex because they became westernized.... they are having because they got freedom..
earlier society had lot of influence in stopping it, by keeping women in jail and taking away their freedom.
whats wrong with casual sex..
as to prostitution, again we Indians dont need western influence, we are among the oldest civilization and world's oldest profession is certainly not new to us, west cant possibly teach us these things.

See, we are the only civilization that has a sex smruti. So what u say is right. My personal point of view is that, this oldest civilization had a different aura of dimension towards sex and casual sex. A similar connotation could be drawn that in older days women were also allowed to choose a groom of their own and their was large scale awareness albeit limited to upper class but it was there. Ad far as freedom is concerned it was existent.

The only drastic change that happened was the start of 11th century where the very definition of our laws and way of life started to bxome diluted.

Since then, it became what it is which is described by you. Some draconian draconian and barbaric laws like sati, women suppression came into existence in that period. Whether u own it to foreign influence then which was becoming a periodic phenomenon by the invasion of outside culture or not, is debatable. But changes did happen.

Now you will agree that in 1050 AD condom and contraceptive pill was not there relating to a lower climb in the number along with the fear attached to it. In 1250 along with moghuls kothas came into existence in India.

Sex was a purely dignified system on its own in our civilization. The kind of sex we see today is not what it was supposed to be according to this old civilization.

What we see today is misuse of sex in the name of freedom just how much we misuse freedom of expression and other things alike.

I have to quote a lady here to validate my position @Levina
 
.
then what did they do after the count ? film the act ???
It is well known that JNU campus its students and around routinely films MMS and posts them online.
Maybe you should check their acts there.
 
.
See, we are the only civilization that has a sex smruti. So what u say is right. My personal point of view is that, this oldest civilization had a different aura of dimension towards sex and casual sex. A similar connotation could be drawn that in older days women were also allowed to choose a groom of their own and their was large scale awareness albeit limited to upper class but it was there. Ad far as freedom is concerned it was existent.

The only drastic change that happened was the start of 11th century where the very definition of our laws and way of life started to bxome diluted.

Since then, it became what it is which is described by you. Some draconian draconian and barbaric laws like sati, women suppression came into existence in that period. Whether u own it to foreign influence then which was becoming a periodic phenomenon by the invasion of outside culture or not, is debatable. But changes did happen.

Now you will agree that in 1050 AD condom and contraceptive pill was not there relating to a lower climb in the number along with the fear attached to it. In 1250 along with moghuls kothas came into existence in India.

Sex was a purely dignified system on its own in our civilization. The kind of sex we see today is not what it was supposed to be according to this old civilization.

What we see today is misuse of sex in the name of freedom just how much we misuse freedom of expression and other things alike.

I have to quote a lady here to validate my position @Levina

I usually don't like dwelling on this topic, but I am making an exception here because I felt ppl 've misunderstood the Indian culture to such an extent that they assume, "this" 3 letter word was considered a taboo in ancient India.
Could somebody take them to Khajrahu temple?
Yes there was a time when Kunti was allowed to have sons born to "devtas", Sita was allowed to choose her groom, and so was Panchali. Women were given enough respect in ancient India.
Indians became prudes after we were attacked and captured by foreigners to whom love and lust meant the same. Interestingly this the time when women in Indian society were relegated to a secondary role.

Ending this conversation with a line by Shashi Tharoor,
The more I seep myself in tradition the more liberal I become...


I am moving out of this thread...
Ciao
 
Last edited:
.
Ending this conversation with a line by Shashi Tharoor,

Madam, that man you quoted is perhaps not the ideal person to quote since there is a lot of grey area in what he did to his last wife.
 
.
It is well known that JNU campus its students and around routinely films MMS and posts them online.
Maybe you should check their acts there.
I m sure you meant well, but the (only) three videos I found online had some objectionable content, one of them being the kissing incident. However, to my surprise, I also got innumerable videos do such content from different educational institutions. So I don't understand why JNU is getting the limelight.
 
.
For the same reason Kanaiya kumar got the lime light. Student union leaders of other universities do not get such limelight, do they ?

If they want the applause, they need to accept the brick bats too.
Hmmmm, so it's not the problem with JNU, but the student leader it hosts. Very accurate logic.
 
.
When I watch an Indian channel, I see a lot of ads of condoms and other advertisements that are suggestive in one way or another of extra marital relationships.

To me, Indian culture would be very similar to what we have back in Pakistan - generally conservative. But watching their movie trailers (I dont watch Bollywood movies) and TV, it does not seem like.

My question to Indian members would be - How rampant is pre-marital sex and consensual relationships without marriage in India? Is it slowly becoming acceptable?

I know for certain media in not representative of a society. It glamorizes and exaggerates but still I would like to ask.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom