ice_man
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2009
- Messages
- 6,727
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Bangladesh was too far gone by 1971. 24 years of poison is a long time. Had it happened earlier, maybe India would have taken it back into her fold. As things stand now, we would like to keep them confined to their borders. Strategically, it makes no difference. Something Pakistan has for long looked at Afghanistan as.
Well, I don't know about hypocrisy, but what should one call it when a Muslim laments about someone being forced out of their own land and asked to convert by force? The Jews are re-taking what was always theirs. They want a Jewish state. They do not have an issue with the natives being there as long as the re-vert. Is that so alien a concept for you?
was it 24 years of poision against india? IF so then East Paksitan would have not tried for independence would they because clearly then there enemy would have been India & not their western wing? so clearly they were not poisoned by us & hence the mualana's theory is a flop. they preferred to go their own way & not even consider rejoining "all muslims of india united" theory that 7 times president of congress (mualana) had supported.
now turning to the jews of israel who said it was their land? & this whole thing of if palsetanians convert they can stay logic do you apply to india? because clearly you can't have 2 views to a similar situation? jew under salahudin were protected & allowed to practise their religion.
even in the 40s when they came to the palestanian lands the palestanians treated them well only for them to turn around hit the actual settlers of the land.