What's new

JF-17 Ready To Deliver Another Surprise

.
Jf 17 can pick up 4000 kg on its wings. 1 raad missile with conventional warhead us 1100 kg approx and nuclear war head is also around that figure although hughly classified. So theorically JF 17 can pick up 3 raad missiles with 1 fuel tank

In a strike formation only 3 to 4 aircraft carry stand off missiles. PAF plans to integrate chinese cruise missiles of more than 1900 KG on each wing.

RAAD is just a start.


Babur 4 is 1500 KG with length of 6 meters. Even 2 of those can be carried by jf 17. 1 under each wing.

Hi,

Guess you did not take physics in school / college
 
.
IF
PAF totally redesign the JF-17bk3 like Mitsubishi F-2
25% larger wing span
taller like Mirage fighter
than this will help thunder to carry better weapon payload
ie AA & AG weapons
PL-15 & Raad missiles
otherwise thunder bk-3 will be same like bk-2
F2andF16 copy.jpg
 
.
Jf 17 can pick up 4000 kg on its wings. 1 raad missile with conventional warhead us 1100 kg approx and nuclear war head is also around that figure although hughly classified. So theorically JF 17 can pick up 3 raad missiles with 1 fuel tank

In a strike formation only 3 to 4 aircraft carry stand off missiles. PAF plans to integrate chinese cruise missiles of more than 1900 KG on each wing.

RAAD is just a start.


Babur 4 is 1500 KG with length of 6 meters. Even 2 of those can be carried by jf 17. 1 under each wing.

Hi

Plz tell us what you studied in college / univ

IF
PAF totally redesign the JF-17bk3 like Mitsubishi F-2
25% larger wing span
taller like Mirage fighter
than this will help thunder to carry better weapon payload
ie AA & AG weapons
PL-15 & Raad missiles
otherwise thunder bk-3 will be same like bk-2
View attachment 575644

Hi

Thank you fir posting it.
You also would know why the japanese took a perfectly designed F16 enlarged it and changed it to meet their specs
 
.
External load has gone up from 36-3700 kg to 43-4500 kg max take off weight gone up from 12300-12700kg to 13500kg or 13.5 tons per specs in Paris

Wingspan on b model has increase About a meter per avic website for all chines products, not sure if block 3 will also have same wingspan

http://www.avic.com/en/forbusiness/militaryaviationanddefense/fighters/index.shtml

8.5 to 9.4 m w/o wingtip missile fins included
 
.
Kindly utilize JF-17 Block-III STICKY thread for relevant discussion.

Regards,
 
.
IF
PAF totally redesign the JF-17bk3 like Mitsubishi F-2
25% larger wing span
taller like Mirage fighter
than this will help thunder to carry better weapon payload
ie AA & AG weapons
PL-15 & Raad missiles
otherwise thunder bk-3 will be same like bk-2
View attachment 575644
It's not going to be redesigned for BLK3 I think that has been reiterated multiple times.
 
.
Hi

Plz tell us what you studied in college / univ

What i studied at all 3 of my umiversities is irrelevant. Are you trying to tell me that a JF 17 cant carry and deliver two RAAD missiles with combined weight of 2200 KGs and just 4.5 meters length? Leaving the landing gear problem aside which is being looked into.
 
. .
The latest version is using pak made components like imu. Etc ie no foreign or imported lru now are part of rek

Not sure but range may also be more than before



An IMU allows a GPS receiver to work when GPS-signals are unavailable, such as in tunnels, inside buildings, or when electronic interference is present. A wireless IMU is known as a WIMU.
 
.
What i studied at all 3 of my umiversities is irrelevant. Are you trying to tell me that a JF 17 cant carry and deliver two RAAD missiles with combined weight of 2200 KGs and just 4.5 meters length? Leaving the landing gear problem aside which is being looked into.

Hi

The relevance comes in the Physics of the utility like weight and balance rollover factor.

You sound very smart and agitated but you dont look like someone who understands machines very well.
That is why i asked.
i want to know how is it possible fir university educated pakistani to be so lacking in knowledge in weights and distribution of weights on machines and what are the consequences of unbalanced weight distribution
 
Last edited:
.
Hi

The relevance comes in the Physics of the utility like weight and balance rollover factor.

You sound very smart and agitated but you dont look like someone who understands machines very well.
That is why i asked.
i want to know how is it possible fir university educated pakistani to be so lacking in knowledge in weights and distribution of weights on machines and what are the consequences of unbalanced weight distribution

If a jf 17 can carry 2 YJ-12B cruise missiles weighing around 2500 KG in 2017 chengdu skies then why cant it do 1100 KG on each wing with RAAD?
 
Last edited:
.
If a jf 17 can carry 2 YJ-12B cruise missiles weighing around 2500 KG in 2017 chengdu skies then why cant it do 1100 KG on each wing with RAAD?

Just answer a simple yea or nay---if you learnt physics at school---meaning your university---.
 
.
If a jf 17 can carry 2 YJ-12B cruise missiles weighing around 2500 KG in 2017 chengdu skies then why cant it do 1100 KG on each wing with RAAD?
we dont know is short answer, long answer is ground clearence

however, would take much to make a new weapon for jf17, i am pretty sure there are replacements already in service, we know about REK, and the unamed SOW that was shown in feb

Raad is simply a nuclear weapon and there is no need for thunder to carry it since we have 100s of mirages that can carry it and Raad is suppose to be SOW weapon launched from within pakistan
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom