Fawadqasim1
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
- Messages
- 4,242
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
It’s practically blk ii with AESA radar hmd and pl 15
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think tooWhy do I feel like this block will disappoint many?
Why do I feel like this block will disappoint many?
with klj7a pl-15 combo and hmd pl-10 combo it surely will disappoint the enemyWhy do I feel like this block will disappoint many?
So, it should not reduce its detection range because it is characteristic of each module but lesser modules means, it can engage lesser of targets simultaneously. Also, it number of modules means relatively easier to jam than an radar made up of more modules given the modules are same.Hi,
Downscale---lesser TR modules.
Thanks for the info. I hope they go with KLJ-7AIt is sure that KLJ-7A radar performes better than LKF601E radar with 864 T/R modules.
The AESA radar of J-10C is another downscale version of the one used by J-20.
Why do I feel like this block will disappoint many?
because it is essentially JF 17 and NOT what our aviation fanboys wish it to beWhy do I feel like this block will disappoint many?
IMO, PAF still wants JF-17 to be a cost-effective lightweight fighter.IMO it will not disappoint anyone with a realistic estimation and common sense. The Block 3 is just what it is, an evolution of the Block 2 with further upgrades and capabilities related to a new avionics suite, most of all an AESA radar.
This is what all reliable sources say ...
However it will surely disappoint those who are still dreaming of a revolutional design featuring a wider, bigger, larger airframe, more fuel, new engines with super much higher thrust + TVC, stealth features, CFT, IRST- and targeting pod included in the airframe and at best to be better than a J-10C, Rafale or a Block 70 F-16C. These are wet dreams and those, who hope for this will surely cry.
That's all.
People are forgetting the purpose; it is to make it like a regular corolla. Fitment to purpose - easy to maintain and does the job. If you expect a Corolla to perform like a ferari - no it wont.because it is essentially JF 17 and NOT what our aviation fanboys wish it to be
Nope. Not Block 52+s
It is game changer that it brings newer capabilities which should have been in PAF 2 decades back.It is dear .
If you have someone in paf / related to this project thn ask , "what happened when block 52 was pitched against jft with various system testing phase ... "
I am saying what i heard . Wait n you will see by urself in next couple of months .
Jft block 3 is a game changer
With aim 9x yes but we don't have aim 9xIt is game changer that it brings newer capabilities which should have been in PAF 2 decades back.
Of course 52 vs jf-17blk 2/3 - you are taking a long knife to a opponent with a sword or shall i saw lance. but close up f-16 will have a slight edge in vvr
IMO, PAF still wants JF-17 to be a cost-effective lightweight fighter.
yeah and its for replace some 400 old fightersPeople are forgetting the purpose; it is to make it like a regular corolla. Fitment to purpose - easy to maintain and does the job. If you expect a Corolla to perform like a ferari - no it wont.