What's new

Javad Zarif writes in Guardian: Peace in Syria is vital. And it’s within our grasp

Daneshmand

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
3,109
Reaction score
43
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Pakistan
Peace in Syria is vital. And it’s within our grasp | Mohammad Javad Zarif | Opinion | The Guardian

By: Javad Zarif, Foreign Minister of Iran

Syrians must be allowed to determine their own fate, free from the interference of those set on promoting a petro-fuelled perversion of Islam

4094.jpg

The Syria peace talks in Vienna in October. ‘The International Syria Support Group should encourage, facilitate and enable Syrians to change the course of their future.’ Photograph: US Department of State/EPA

The International Syria Support Group has provided a unique forum for important discussions among a number of significant players, and there is genuine potential to turn the existing political will to help forge peace into tangible action towards this noble end.

Focus must turn to the political process, and the imperative of a unified front against extremist violence. Yet progress continues to be hindered by preconditions which have prolonged the violence and bloodshed for four years. Indeed, what is most ironic and distressing about these preconditions is that they do not represent the wishes of the Syrian people; rather, they reflect the agendas of outside actors, none of whom have the right to impose their will on an independent nation.

The Syrian people do not need guardians. The age of mandates and protectorates is long gone. It is utterly absurd that those who have denied their own population the most rudimentary tenets of democracy, such as a constitution and elections, are now self-declared champions of democracy in Syria. Their democracy, however, is not to give Syrians a voice, but instead to thwart the political process by stonewalling a ceasefire, while pushing for self-proclaimed al-Qaida affiliates to have a prominent place at the negotiating table.

Indeed, it is alarming that some are oblivious to how bands of villains such as Isis or al-Qaida’s multiple incarnations and reincarnations are a common threat to all of us, including their patrons. It is delusional to believe that sponsoring these terrorists, directly or through their newborn ideological siblings, can ever be an asset or leverage to achieve even short-term political objectives. Yet those who support militant extremism are not only continuing to do so, but they sponsor terror with impunity. They even use their political patronages and web of lobbyists to seek to legitimise such assistance, and its recipients, by differentiating between “good terrorists” and “bad terrorists”.

Beyond slaughtering countless innocents, the hooded villains have proven that while terrorism has no religion, no nationality or ethnic background, it certainly has backers with known addresses and horrific agendas. Ask Syrians. Or Iraqis, who during the past 12 years have been the target of almost 2,000 suicide bombings. The perpetrators of these atrocities, and those who created carnage in New York, London, Madrid, Peshawar, Beirut, Tunis, Paris and San Bernardino all have one common thread. They were all radicalised by demagogues preaching the same petro-fuelled perversion of Islam.

What happened in New York that fateful September morning 14 years ago, and the response, is directly linked to the tragedies in Paris, Beirut and San Bernardino during the past few weeks. Despite its immense cost of hundreds of thousands of lives and more than $400tn, the so-called “war on terror” has failed to achieve its purported objective. The perverted ideology behind groups such as al-Qaida not only lives, but thrives. It has spawned ever more vile manifestations of raw hatred and open thirst for blood. Hooded villains are now ravaging the cradle of civilization.


Terrorists should never have been allowed to set the agenda, or dictate the response. These villains are the offspring of indiscriminate retribution, failure to unite in confronting the roots of terrorism, and continued impunity extended to those so-called allies who perceive extremism as an asset or leverage. We must all recognise that security cannot be achieved at the expense of the insecurity of others. Unless there is a serious change in the course of action, violent extremism will haunt us all, including the hands that feed it.

Make no mistake: for the past four years, Syria has been ground zero in nothing short of a paramount fight for our future. I say “our” – repeating the theme of a recent message by Ayatollah Khamenei, who called the menace of perverted extremism “our common worry” – because the world’s fate is common. No one is immune from the consequences of the outcome of the existential battle that we need to fight.

From the outset of the Syrian crisis, Iran’s position has rested on three pillars: respect for the wishes and free will of the Syrian nation to decide its own destiny and to manage its own affairs; opposition to foreign interference geared to impose the wishes of outside actors on an independent people; and rejection of terrorism as a tool to achieve political objectives.

Based on these pillars, Iran has always insisted that there is no military solution to the Syrian crisis. Only ballots – not bullets – can ultimately usher in a new era in Syria. To this end, Iran has consistently advocated an immediate ceasefire and an end to the bloodshed; dialogue between the Syrian government and the opposition groups who reject terrorism; a concerted and genuine international effort to uproot extremist violence; and a global campaign to address the humanitarian catastrophe now, and to rebuild Syria once the flames of war subside.


The International Syria Support Group should encourage, facilitate and enable Syrians to change the course of their future, and by extension, change the course of our collective future. To do so, all must join hands to put into effect an immediate end to the bloodshed and vigorously focus on promoting an inclusive intra-Syrian political process, bringing together all Syrians with a vested interest in a brighter tomorrow. We must close ranks in the fight against extremist violence and terror, while not allowing rage to come in the way of collective reflection and wisdom for a rational and joint response.

Most importantly, we must together work to confront the roots of extremist violence, including double standards, marginalisation, repression, xenophobia and Islamophobia. If not, our children, and their children, will be forced to. And at much greater cost.
 
Some of the comments below the article written by Guardian readers:

*
"
Iran deserves to be listened to, it is now a major player in the Middle East with a good grasp of the reality in these countries. All sensed nations are seeking to team up to defeat IS, the anglo saxon and other past colonialist countries must swallow their pride and accept that they cannot rule on foreign soil but only create more turmoil and destruction. Th have to come to term with this now."

*
"
From the article:
It is delusional to believe that sponsoring these terrorists, directly or through their newborn ideological siblings, can ever be an asset or leverage to achieve even short-term political objectives....


Tell this to Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and Obama..."

*
"
t is truly comical that Saudi Arabia, a barbaric wahhabi regime, is claiming that it wants democarcy in Syria. Little Al-Jubeir(FM) of Arabia says 'All oprions are on the table' or 'Assad should go, if not peacefully then we'll remove him by force'. First of all, he cannot even remove scalp scabs from his own head let alone remove the government of a much bigger and relatively more modern country. Second, let Jubeir and his wahhabi caliph implement democracy in their own country first before embarking on bringing liberty to Syria. The headcutters of the Middle East, Al-Baghdadi and Al-Salman of Saudi Arabia, should have no place in any gathering let alone deciding the future of a great country like Syria.

The wahhabi sheikhlets of the Persian Gulf must be the first to be removed from power if we are going to have any chance of democracy in the Middle East. But that will not happen because the 'west' need them to buy their arms and provide them with billions of useless commercial contracts. Basically, these corrupt sheikhs whose barbaric tyranny is known to all are acting as partners to 'western' interests and are junior partners in the looting of their own countries by 'western' arm manufactures and oil companies."

*
"
Thankfully, the US seems to finally have come around to the reality of the situation - that is that regime change is not an option and they have no choice but to try and work with Assad rather than against him. The Kerry/Lavrov meeting on Tuesday seems to be the final nail in the coffin for those hoping to oust Assad. Hopefully we can now concentrate on the much more pressing issue which is pushing for a ceasefire between the Syrian Govt and the rebels. Of course, that should not include ISIS, Al-Nusra or any other Al-Qaida affiliates who will remain legitimate targets."

*
"
From the article:
They were all radicalised by demagogues preaching the same petro-fuelled perversion of Islam.

What happened in New York that fateful September morning 14 years ago, and the response, is directly linked to the tragedies in Paris, Beirut and San Bernardino during the past few weeks. Despite its immense cost of hundreds of thousands of lives and more than $400tn, the so-called “war on terror” has failed to achieve its purported objective....



I have no disagreement with any of this except that the problem goes back at least 36 years, not just 14. There's no longer any dispute that the US and Saudi Arabia backed the worst of Salafist terrorists, such as Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, in Afghanistan, starting in the summer of 1979, six months before the Soviets invaded.
Zarif is correct about the underlying role of Saudi religious imperialism funded by petro-dollars. It's a very small step between beheading people in Saudi Arabia for "blasphemy" and declaring takfir and killing all who disagree with you as the Syria jihadis have done, including those McInsane pals around with and calls "moderate."

Zarif is also on the right track in talking about "purported objectives." The unstated objectives that define the environment in which western diplomats and media pundits work are the institutional imperatives of the MIC:

1) profits for arms manufacturers and other military contractors, 2) career enhancement for military brass, civilian employees of the CIA, Pentagon, State Department, and militarist thinktanks, 3) attendant high paying jobs guaranteed by ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) for “US persons” that keep those employees loyal to the system, 4) pork for politicians and 5) blockbuster movies and sensational headlines to sell media (and also to contribute to the necessary fear and jingoism).

These unadvertised objectives are the selective environment in which journalists, pundits and foreign policy advisors must exist. If they don't support the current policies that further these imperatives, they aren't hired in the first place."

*
"
That's the first time I've been able to agree wholeheartedly with an article in this paper about Syria!"
 
Some of the comments below the article written by Guardian readers:

*
"
Iran deserves to be listened to, it is now a major player in the Middle East with a good grasp of the reality in these countries. All sensed nations are seeking to team up to defeat IS, the anglo saxon and other past colonialist countries must swallow their pride and accept that they cannot rule on foreign soil but only create more turmoil and destruction. Th have to come to term with this now."

*
"
From the article:
It is delusional to believe that sponsoring these terrorists, directly or through their newborn ideological siblings, can ever be an asset or leverage to achieve even short-term political objectives....


Tell this to Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and Obama..."

*
"
t is truly comical that Saudi Arabia, a barbaric wahhabi regime, is claiming that it wants democarcy in Syria. Little Al-Jubeir(FM) of Arabia says 'All oprions are on the table' or 'Assad should go, if not peacefully then we'll remove him by force'. First of all, he cannot even remove scalp scabs from his own head let alone remove the government of a much bigger and relatively more modern country. Second, let Jubeir and his wahhabi caliph implement democracy in their own country first before embarking on bringing liberty to Syria. The headcutters of the Middle East, Al-Baghdadi and Al-Salman of Saudi Arabia, should have no place in any gathering let alone deciding the future of a great country like Syria.

The wahhabi sheikhlets of the Persian Gulf must be the first to be removed from power if we are going to have any chance of democracy in the Middle East. But that will not happen because the 'west' need them to buy their arms and provide them with billions of useless commercial contracts. Basically, these corrupt sheikhs whose barbaric tyranny is known to all are acting as partners to 'western' interests and are junior partners in the looting of their own countries by 'western' arm manufactures and oil companies."

*
"
Thankfully, the US seems to finally have come around to the reality of the situation - that is that regime change is not an option and they have no choice but to try and work with Assad rather than against him. The Kerry/Lavrov meeting on Tuesday seems to be the final nail in the coffin for those hoping to oust Assad. Hopefully we can now concentrate on the much more pressing issue which is pushing for a ceasefire between the Syrian Govt and the rebels. Of course, that should not include ISIS, Al-Nusra or any other Al-Qaida affiliates who will remain legitimate targets."

*
"
From the article:
They were all radicalised by demagogues preaching the same petro-fuelled perversion of Islam.

What happened in New York that fateful September morning 14 years ago, and the response, is directly linked to the tragedies in Paris, Beirut and San Bernardino during the past few weeks. Despite its immense cost of hundreds of thousands of lives and more than $400tn, the so-called “war on terror” has failed to achieve its purported objective....



I have no disagreement with any of this except that the problem goes back at least 36 years, not just 14. There's no longer any dispute that the US and Saudi Arabia backed the worst of Salafist terrorists, such as Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, in Afghanistan, starting in the summer of 1979, six months before the Soviets invaded.
Zarif is correct about the underlying role of Saudi religious imperialism funded by petro-dollars. It's a very small step between beheading people in Saudi Arabia for "blasphemy" and declaring takfir and killing all who disagree with you as the Syria jihadis have done, including those McInsane pals around with and calls "moderate."

Zarif is also on the right track in talking about "purported objectives." The unstated objectives that define the environment in which western diplomats and media pundits work are the institutional imperatives of the MIC:

1) profits for arms manufacturers and other military contractors, 2) career enhancement for military brass, civilian employees of the CIA, Pentagon, State Department, and militarist thinktanks, 3) attendant high paying jobs guaranteed by ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) for “US persons” that keep those employees loyal to the system, 4) pork for politicians and 5) blockbuster movies and sensational headlines to sell media (and also to contribute to the necessary fear and jingoism).

These unadvertised objectives are the selective environment in which journalists, pundits and foreign policy advisors must exist. If they don't support the current policies that further these imperatives, they aren't hired in the first place."

*
"
That's the first time I've been able to agree wholeheartedly with an article in this paper about Syria!"
Thanks for this. I usually spend more time reading the comments than the article itself. At the end of the day, what public thinks is important.
 
Back
Top Bottom