Japan’s Anti-China Coalition Is Dangerous

[Rechoice]

How can we bully anyone when you got the powerful USA to protect them? Logic is need for the Vietnamese in here.

what china did in the past and now ? robbed our Islands, drilled oil in our EZZ. China is enemy of Viets now.

Logic is for us to make friends with people in the world to against Chinese aggressor. It is clear for you ?

 

[BoQ77]

The negotiation table is always open and welcome but you must first show cooperation by removing your military ships near our expensive drilling platform.

What you said above is not true.

It's China who bring military ships and aircrafts to the site, not Vietnam.
Want evidence or not ??

And we order you to bring evidence showing Vietnam bring military ships to the site ???

--------
Viewing what Chinese expressed in Shangri-la dialogue ... everyone think that China prefer confront to negotiate.

Chinese warships near the Oil Rig 981 in Vietnam EEZ

 

[Mr Second Back]

NO, that is a lie.
the letter says North Vietnam government recognised China internal water (12nm), from the mainland shore. Nothing else.

As for your "help" during the wars, without China sabotage and double-faced tactics, Vietnam would have avoided the war against America and would be an united country in 1954. Your "help" sucks. the little support you gave Vietnam was completely destroyed by the PLA gangsters.

NO, you were our enemy in the past and are our enemy today. Nothing has changed.

So why did HCM still come "enemy" country for help?

 

[xunzi]

What you said above is not true.

It's China who bring military ships and aircrafts to the site, not Vietnam.
Want evidence or not ??

And we order you to bring evidence showing Vietnam bring military ships to the site ???

Chinese warships near the Oil Rig 981 in Vietnam EEZ

That after you already bring in your warships to harass us when your coast guard ships cannot handle our coast guard ships and civilian fishing boats.

 

[Rechoice]

I mean China also released Chinese statement on Sep 4, 1958. Right? So why did Pham Van Dong say"The Government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam recognizes and agree to the decision and statement on the Chinese Government of People's Republic of China on the Territorial Sea of September 4, 1958" As an highly educated Minister of Foreign Affairs, he should know that must have some missunderstanding in the future! Or he was that meaning.

chinese is lying with wording.

on the Territorial Sea is 12 miles related to Coastline of China Hainan and Guangxi from responsibility of North Vietnam. He didn't said about Islands, which belong to South Vietnam after 1954. He didn't has right to say that.
Can North Korean say that Dokdo belong to Japan ?

 

[xunzi]

what china did in the past and now ? robbed our Islands, drilled oil in our EZZ. China is enemy of Viets now.

Logic is for us to make friends with people in the world to against Chinese aggressor. It is clear for you ?

Past and now, still peaceful. No such thing as robbing. Strong word there, my friend. Nobody recognizes the island belong to you. Why don't you ask your Pinoy friend if Spratly belongs to you since you claim it.

The world can see that the one ganging up is usually the aggressor. Just look at NATO. Do you think NATO purpose is for defense purpose only?

 

[xunzi]

chinese is lying with wording.

on the Territorial Sea is 12 miles related to Coastline of China Hainan and Guangxi from responsibility of North Vietnam. He didn't said about Islands, which belong to South Vietnam after 1954. He didn't has right to say that.
Can North Korean say that Dokdo belong to Japan ?

You don't understand, do you? We declared our territory including Paracel belong to us. He sent a memo saying Vietnam recognized it. Vietnam didn't protest when we control Paracel until a few year later. In international law, that is an act of acceptance.

 

[Sam.]

chinese is lying with wording.

on the Territorial Sea is 12 miles related to Coastline of China Hainan and Guangxi from responsibility of North Vietnam. He didn't said about Islands, which belong to South Vietnam after 1954. He didn't has right to say that.
Can North Korean say that Dokdo belong to Japan ?

His Righteousness will not allow him to see the truth.Maybe he will understand in simple language -
1) Personal A has a fish.
2)Person B want that fish.
3)Person C can't give fish to person B as it's not his to give.

Person A - South Vietnam
Person B - China
Person C - North vietnam

fish - disputed Island

If they still don't understand then they should attend Nursery class first.

 

[Rechoice]

So why did HCM still come "enemy" country for help?

when China did not dislosed true face of China.

 

[xunzi]

His Righteousness will not allow him to see the truth.Maybe he will understand in simple language -
1) Personal A has a fish.
2)Person B want that fish.
3)Person C can't give fish to person B as it's not his to give.

Person A - South Vietnam
Person B - China
Person C - North vietnam

fish - disputed Island

If they still don't understand then they should attend Nursery class first.

If Person C can't give fish to person B, then why Person C claim ownership of Person B's fish now? Indian logic never fail to amaze me. LOL

 

[Rechoice]

Past and now, still peaceful. No such thing as robbing. Strong word there, my friend. Nobody recognizes the island belong to you. Why don't you ask your Pinoy friend if Spratly belongs to you since you claim it.

The world can see that the one ganging up is usually the aggressor. Just look at NATO. Do you think NATO purpose is for defense purpose only?

Chinese PLA killed Vietnamese in Paracel 1974 and Gacma 1988. Who are you ? Chinese are aggressors.

 

[Sam.]

If Person C can't give fish to person B, then why Person C claim ownership of Person B's fish now? Indian logic never fail to amaze me. LOL

Because Person B gives lots of money to Person C to do it. Chinese stupidity always amaze me.

 

[Rechoice]

You don't understand, do you? We declared our territory including Paracel belong to us. He sent a memo saying Vietnam recognized it. Vietnam didn't protest when we control Paracel until a few year later. In international law, that is an act of acceptance.

no, China declared 12 miles of sea water. so North Vietnam letter didn't mentioned about Island Paracel and Spratly.

Can North Korean say Dokdo belong to Japan ?

 

[Viet]

You protect the islands in the sea, but you will lose the independence and freedom, in fact - the whole territory. America never does good deeds. Afterall, they occupy you, and no one will help.
Territorial disputes with neighbors - that's not reason to go back to colonial status.

do you want to save Vietnam from becoming US colony?
do you wish to see an independent Vietnam?

you held the key. here are things to be done:

- Russia transfers weapon technologies to Vietnam to self produce Gepards, Kilos and Yakhonts
- Putin calls Xi and asks him to withdraw the oil rig and warships out of our water immediately or face consequences

 

[BoQ77]

That after you already bring in your warships to harass us when your coast guard ships cannot handle our coast guard ships and civilian fishing boats.

Let prove what you said please. Don't troll by baseless statement.