52051
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2016
- Messages
- 2,245
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
We can talk science all night long brother..
Here we go, how chinese were force mixtured more than mongolian amd japanese..read amd get some IQ points..
Except no DNA evidence suggest that, except the monoglians have 20%+ sino-Tibetans O3 as their male-side ancestors whilst for Japanese, they have 30%+ O3 from Sino-Tibetan.
So its not all-day long its your typical low-IQ random nonsense that backed up by no genetic evidence.
A maximum likelihood (ML) tree reconstructed based on pairwise allele frequency difference provides a better visualization of the genetic relationship of populations (Fig. 2a). All the East Asian populations share a clade, and Mongolians are much closer to European than any other East Asian groups. Among the eight non-Mongolian East Asian populations, the Tibetan population (TIB) shows apparent differentiation from the other seven populations which are comprised of four typical mainland populations (CDX, CHB, CHS and KHV) and three island or peninsula populations (JPRK, JPT and KOR).
Do you know what you are talking about, Y-DNA is quite a bit different than genetic distance, Y-DNA indicates your male-side ancestors
Let me explain that to you:
If an aryan invader raped local, the byproduct childern will carry a Y-DNA R, if the child marry to a local female, their descendant will still carry this R.
Assume for every generation, the child marry to local females, than 50 generation later, the male-side ancestor of you is still R, but you almost contain nothing genetically like an Aryan invader (2^-50)
Get it?
That's why Y-DNA indicates the male side ancestor of a race, whilst whole DNA distance indicate your current gene mixtures.
Since Chinese don't even have a single Y-DNA D2 in their DNA, how could you say they are mixture from Japanese?
On the contrary, the evidence suggesting you are byproduct of Aryan invasion is truly overwhelming genetically.
An individual level neighbor-joining (NJ) tree of 1002 world-wide individuals based on genotyping differentiation was also constructed (Additional file 4: Figure S2A). African and European individuals cluster together respectively, and East Asians individuals also have their own distinct cluster. In East Asians individuals, Mongolian, Ryukyuan and Tibetan have relatively distinct cluster, while Han Chinese, Japanese and Korean showed a relatively mixed phylogeny, suggest their much closer relationship, although substructures are also apparent
Don't citing random stuff that not even remote support or relate to your joke.
Everyone knows East Asian are more related to each other comparing they are to, lets say, indians.