Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
China does not need to retaliate against any country or organization.China cannot become world #1 without paying back Japan and NATO. These are prerequisites for world transitioning to China-led order away from US-led order.
BTW, US already atoned for NATO embassy bombing. The destruction of the Twin Towers 9/11 false flag event was the apology from the US to China (hey look we blew up own own billion dollar buildings)! BUT the world doesn't know that. So there still needs public display of revenge exacting for embassy bombing...
China is popular amongst Islamists. This is what my friends from Saudi Arabia told me.China does not need to retaliate against any country or organization.
The hatred between Japan and China took place 80 years ago, and the current Japanese have nothing to do with the original hatred. We only need the Japanese to fully understand and admit their original mistakes and crimes, and to truly and honestly apologize.
We have been in alliance with NATO for most of the time. NATO's enemies are the Soviet Union and Russia, not China. We have no reason to retaliate against NATO countries.
Our real enemies are those countries that block a multipolar world, those countries that promote anti China ideas, and those countries that block the progress of human civilization by inciting war and hatred.
For a country like China, we should be more responsible for the future of mankind than for past hatred.
BTW: The 911 incident has nothing to do with China. Such remarks as "911 is China's revenge" are insulting the Chinese people. Conspiracy against civilians is a shameful act that seriously violates traditional Chinese morality.
Largely becos china never invade any muslim country or interfer in muslim affairs in other countries, and china has friendly relations with nearly all muslim countries.China is popular amongst Islamists. This is what my friends from Saudi Arabia told me.
Also because Islamists, they see China as a neutral and impartial party.Largely becos china never invade any muslim country or interfer in muslim affairs in other countries, and china has friendly relations with nearly all muslim countries.
Since the Afghan Taliban won the war, it passed down for generations in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and China for generations.Largely becos china never invade any muslim country or interfer in muslim affairs in other countries, and china has friendly relations with nearly all muslim countries.
It will not matter even if Japan go build 50 more of their biggest warships, or even a hundred if Japan hope to intimidate China.two ships doesn't mean anything. don't think the current administration there will last too long. perhaps the next one will be more china friendly.
Then Chinese cruise missiles will fly in their thousands to take out what not taken out military assets in that first 10++ minutes.Shugart and Gonzalez also point out that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has carried out drills simulating preemptive attacks against America’s regional military assets. In one such instance, the PLA Rocket Forces “appears to have been practicing on several ship targets of a similar size to U.S. Arleigh Burke –class destroyers moored in a mock port that is a near-mirror image of the actual inner harbor at the U.S. naval base in Yokosuka.” This is illuminating, the authors note, because the only way the Chinese military could catch three U.S. ships in port is if they conducted a complete surprise attack.
After reviewing Chinese capabilities and doctrines, the authors try to simulate such an attack to judge its effectiveness. Interestingly, while they believe China would strike U.S. bases in Japan and even some Japanese forces, they assume Beijing would avoid attacks on Korea “in order to prevent a distracting second front on the Korean Peninsula while pursuing its primary military goals elsewhere.” In their simulation, they also assume that Beijing would not initially target America’s base at Guam since it is U.S. territory and China would want to prevent an escalation that could result in America bombing mainland China.
Shugart and Gonzales run two different models of a simulated preemptive attack, keeping in mind what they know about U.S. and allied missile defense systems in the region. In both models, “enough ballistic missiles seemed likely to leak through to cause highly significant damage to U.S. bases and forces in the region.” Some of the results of the attacks include:
• “Almost every major fixed headquarters and logistical facility struck, with key headquarters struck within the first few minutes of the conflict.”
• “Almost every U.S. ship in port in Japan struck pierside by ballistic missiles.”
• “In most cases, cratering by ballistic missiles of every runway and runway-length taxiway at all major U.S. air bases in Japan.”
• “As a result of runway cratering, headquarters destruction, and air defense degradation, more than 200 trapped U.S. aircraft destroyed on the ground in the first hours of the conflict.”
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...