Deino
INT'L MOD
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 12,780
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Do you see any visible differences on this prototype versus the yellow one we saw a while ago?
several ... or do you confuse it with the green one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you see any visible differences on this prototype versus the yellow one we saw a while ago?
My apologies, I meant the green one instead of the yellow one.several ... or do you confuse it with the green one?
My apologies, I meant the green one instead of the yellow one.
But PLAAF has already has J-20, aren't they?there is an airforce version? i though this jet was for navy?
J-35 is new design compared with J-20. Designed for navy.But PLAAF has already has J-20, aren't they?
it looks more of a multirole kind of jet ....... plus china has refined it so much i think it will be a very potent air to air fighter!But PLAAF has already has J-20, aren't they?
Edit : Or maybe they make land based version to replace JH-7? The problem is what kind of role that the J-35 will take? Multi role? A to A role? or strike role?
it looks more of a multirole kind of jet ....... plus china has refined it so much i think it will be a very potent air to air fighter!
If the J-35 doesn't have sidebay, it will not be multi-role fighter. China missiles are wider and less compact compared to US counterpart that builds more smaller diameter or foldable fins missiles & bombs to squeeze into the F-22 and F-35 smaller internal bays. The F-22 is solely air to air while F-35 is mainly for air to air or air to ground, only either 1. US won't risk losing stealth by allowing F-35 to carry external payload during actual war.
I'm not liking the new cockpit design. There is not enough visibility for the pilot in the rear aspect.
Come on ... the F-35 also has no side-bays but is surely more a multirole type than any other current fighter. As such it may limit its weapons load but it in no way excludes it from being multirole.
If J-35 fitted with rear camera, then the pilot doesn't have to tilt headIt is a bubble canopy that flares out to the sides. The only area blocked is directly behind the pilot's head. The view is fine unless the pilot likes cranking his neck backwards 180 degrees like an owl to look directly behind him.
View attachment 847156
not important any more, no need at all, actually.I'm not liking the new cockpit design. There is not enough visibility for the pilot in the rear aspect.