What's new

J&K's first Civil Services topper Shah Faesal's 'Rapistan' tweet makes Centre fume

His State is under illegal Indian occupation for Past 70 years his people are suffering for around a century they faced multiple ethnic cleansing attempts yet you have the gall to blame him?

You do know that if we wanted it we could have done it right?

If you really think a bunch of drug-addicted, religious fanatics with stones in their hands can thwart an attempt, you are dreaming.

The only ones who got cleansed was the non-Muslims of the valley. Pillaged, raped, killed and thrown out.
 
.
You do know that if we wanted it we could have done it right?
are you dying all the ethnic cleansing attempts?
1947 massacre by dogras to till this day?

1947-pakistan-massacre-story-mans-life-sept-1958-8x6-jpg.349897
 
.
so you think Burhan wani is a terrorist, what are your views about Bhagat singh i am sure he is also terrorist in your books
Bhagat singh was a revolutionary and a member of Hindustan Socialist Republican Association. Unlike a religious hothead like Burhan, who fights for an Islamic state. Bhagat Singh never planted bombs nor IED targetting civilians. Even when Bhagat Singh actually 'bombed' the british, he made sure nobody is killed by using smoke bombs. Did HSRA ask all Muslims, all Sikhs to leave India? Hizbul Mujahideen have committed crimes against humanity and hence it is a banned terrorist organization in all of the countries including Pakistan. That includes killing minority Hindu - Pundits.

Jamaat-i-Islami founded Hizbul Mujahideen at the request of the ISI to counter the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front(JKLF) who are advocates for the independence of Kashmir. They also have killed members of JKLF, now jog on man. Don't compare a terrorist of a terrorist organization to a Bharati like Bhagat Singh. There is a light year difference between them.
 
.
Bhagat singh was a revolutionary and a member of Hindustan Socialist Republican Association. Unlike a religious hothead like Burhan, who fights for an Islamic state. Bhagat Singh never planted bombs nor IED targetting civilians. Even when Bhagat Singh actually 'bombed' the british, he made sure nobody is killed by using smoke bombs. Did HSRA ask all Muslims, all Sikhs to leave India? Hizbul Mujahideen have committed crimes against humanity and hence it is a banned terrorist organization in all of the countries including Pakistan. That includes killing minority Hindu - Pundits.

Jamaat-i-Islami founded Hizbul Mujahideen at the request of the ISI to counter the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front(JKLF) who are advocates for the independence of Kashmir. They also have killed members of JKLF, now jog on man. Don't compare a terrorist of a terrorist organization to a Bharati like Bhagat Singh. There is a light year difference between them.
there is too much irony in your post
Burhan was fighting against Foreign occupation force just like Bhagat this makes him as much as terrorist or Freedom fighter it depends on you how you interpret it
Bhaggat singh was terrorist for British colonists and Hero for Indian people in the very same way Burhan is hero of Kashmiri people who died fighting an occupational force you can call him whatever you want because he was the one who resisted the Indian regime but for Kashmiri people he is their hero
and what kind of lame argument is that calling him religious hothead his struggle was for liberating his country from your occupation and that's what matters
 
.
there is too much irony in your post
Burhan was fighting against Foreign occupation force just like Bhagat this makes him as much as terrorist or Freedom fighter it depends on you how you interpret it
Lol! The freedom Bhagat Singh wanted wasn't even based on religious reasons. Rather based on nationalism. Hizbul Mujahideen advocates religious nationalism (and join Pakistan). And acts as stooges of Pakistan. Did Bhagat Singh ever wanted join another country, or did he act on the direction of another country?
Bhaggat singh was terrorist for British colonists and Hero for Indian people in the very same way Burhan is hero of Kashmiri people who died fighting an occupational force you can call him whatever you want because he was the one who resisted the Indian regime but for Kashmiri people he is their hero
Does anyone really endorse Wani? Some paid idiots in the valley still hang pics of the poster boy. He was not fighting for freedom but secession to join Pakistan.
He is no different than Balach Marri of BLA.

and what kind of lame argument is that calling him religious hothead his struggle was for liberating his country from your occupation and that's what matters
Suure... That's why Hizbul Mujahideen killed off Pandits in the valley and drove them out.
Boy, go read what Hizbul Mujahideen fights for. They don't fight for independent Kashmir, they fight for joining Pakistan.

The only people who were for independent Kashmir were killed off by Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists. They were called JKLF, only a few managed to escape from them, and they joined politics.
 
.
Lol! The freedom Bhagat Singh wanted wasn't even based on religious reasons. Rather based on nationalism. Hizbul Mujahideen advocates religious nationalism (and join Pakistan). And acts as stooges of Pakistan. Did Bhagat Singh ever wanted join another country, or did he act on the direction of another country?

Does anyone really endorse Wani? Some paid idiots in the valley still hang pics of the poster boy. He was not fighting for freedom but secession to join Pakistan.
He is no different than Balach Marri of BLA.


Suure... That's why Hizbul Mujahideen killed off Pandits in the valley and drove them out.
Boy, go read what Hizbul Mujahideen fights for. They don't fight for independent Kashmir, they fight for joining Pakistan.

The only people who were for independent Kashmir were killed off by Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists. They were called JKLF, only a few managed to escape from them, and they joined politics.
either both of them are terrorist or freedom fighter
Kahmir is not Part of Indian just like India was not part of briton both were/are occupied territories
 
. .
How is he right?

Patriarchy is dying, people are coming out and embracing modern times, parents are listening to children. If there was real sense of patriarchy we would not have seen miss worlds and women winning boxing, olympic medals, gold, sailing or most of all, beauty pageants. Instead they all would be sitting in kitchens and cooking food.

mc-mary-kom-pti_806x605_61481278339.jpg


Manushi-Chillar..jpg


pune-2.jpg


_H_HzT2Z_400x400.jpg


You think all of this would have been possible if we were patriarchal in real sense?

Let's not fall for this western stereotype.

Many small towns are still patriarchal but things are changing.

India is diverse country and conservatism varies. Rajasthan has too much conservatism while my state is one of the most liberal where we neither have chauvinists nor feminists.

So how exactly is India patriarchal?

Don't buy the feminist-NGO propaganda. Feminists have ruined US society and now men have something there called MGTOW. They are now seeing new societies to ruin through artificial madness.


Population is stablizing fast in middle class, only the poor rural people will not stop or reduce making babies.; these people won't listen to anything except China-style population control.

Rape culture? India's rape per capita is lower than many European and Western countries put together. Just because some low-life blood traitors like Burkha Dutts and other presstitutes write falsely about false cases and Brits pick it up to spread their lies and hate against India, doesn't mean it is real.

Here is something for you to check:

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/nor...i-delhi-commission-of-women-233222-2014-12-29

Delhi Commission of Women themselves admitted that rape cases are false. 53.2%!!

http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate


Check where India ranks and where so-called 'developed' countries rank.

_______

This loser so-called IAS forgot that his state did the worse rape and massacre in the modern history and drove out nearly half a million people in the name of religion.

No other state has the shame of doing what his state did.

Let's see what he has to say for that!

Agreed.
But points like population is absolutely right .Huge population breeds poverty,law and order problems .
Kashmir case is terrorism supported by our western neighbour.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom