It's time to admit Chinese culture is superior to Indian culture

[karmaa]

Yeah sure, but how come Muslims did not teach you not to crap in the streets, thrown your dead into the filthy Ganges, then crap and bathe in the feces. I have been to India from Kashmir to Kochi. It is all filthy with cows, dung, monkeys and human feces floating in the air. Compare that to China which has lifted 1 BILLION people out of poverty. While 2,200 corrupt families control India. Why do you think that all your human detritus is coming to the west to do the most menial jobs that no western person wants to do? Blame that on the Muslims too.

View attachment 1029241

Democracy and muslims overpopulation are responsible for all types of backwardness of India. We need communist type of govt .

 

[nahtanbob]

Fool, keep denying all the facts and truth won't make you people's IQ of 76 go up.

you seem scared by people with IQ of 76

 

[TheSolution]

Democracy and muslims overpopulation are responsible for all types of backwardness of India. We need communist type of govt .

India would be an even bigger and more embarrassing shithole if it was just a bunch of Hindutva guys like you

Eating cowshit and cow piss 24/7 is worshipping idols like goofs

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Are you bored of marriage?

@-=virus=- @Paitoo @lastofthepatriots

There is a kinda offensive joke in my local lang which loosely translates to "You don't open a tea stall to drink one tea".

 

[prashantazazel]

It is not that complicated. Most Indians are laid-back, and a few work hard.

Most Chinese work extremely hard, and a few are laid-back.

Now it is upto you to decide what are your goals in life.

 

[Manidabest]

Countries and regions that are heavily influenced by Chinese culture( or Confucianism）： China mainland, Taiwan, Singapore, Hongkong, Japan, North and South Korea, Vietnam.

Similarities: 1,Use or used Chinese characters as basic writing systems. 2, Use chopsticks as eating utensils. 3, Majority people are atheists.

View attachment 1027748
View attachment 1027763

Countries and regions that heavily influenced by Indian culture: India, Pakistan, Bengal, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia, China's Tibet.

Similarities: 1, Use Sanskrit or variants as writing systems. 2, Directly use hand as eating utensil. 3, Majority people are religious.

View attachment 1027740
View attachment 1027771

Obviously sino-sphere countries are much developed, clean, orderly. Countries influenced by Indian culture are backward, dirty and chaotic.

I believe sino-sphere will be more advanced in science and technologies than the Anglo-Saxon countries(5 eyes) in the near future.

yes when it comes to personal hygiene and cleanliness i agree

 

[karmaa]

India would be an even bigger and more embarrassing shithole if it was just a bunch of Hindutva guys like you

Eating cowshit and cow piss 24/7 is worshipping idols like goofs

China knows how to deal with radical islam , we want to deal in the same way but because of democracy our hands are tied .

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Lol, you do agree that the man who created Buddhism was a Nepalese, not Indian. That says a lot.

Nepal was a kingdom created by a Hindu King Prithvi Narayan Shah in the 18th Century he was a Rajput king. He unified small states and named the Kingdom Nepal. Lumbini is located less than 5 km from the Indian border. Calling Buddha Nepalese is as stupid as one can get. He was a Sakhya prince belonging to one of the Mahajanapadas in India. They were Hindu kings who lived around the Gangetic region of India.

It is not that complicated. Most Indians are laid-back, and a few work hard.

Most Chinese work extremely hard, and a few are laid-back.

Now it is upto you to decide what are your goals in life.

That's not true, it has to do with the availability of resources and land. There are lazies and hard working among all groups of people. Some were lucky to have everything going right, from rulers, resources, geographical location and people. You need all these to work in your favour to have a successful country. And a successful country should be sustainable too at least for the next 100 years. That is their population should continue to grow along with the economy and expand their sphere of influence through culture.

 

[etylo]

Nepal was a kingdom created by a Hindu King Prithvi Narayan Shah in the 18th Century he was a Rajput king. He unified small states and named the Kingdom Nepal. Lumbini is located less than 5 km from the Indian border. Calling Buddha Nepalese is as stupid as one can get. He was a Sakhya prince belonging to one of the Mahajanapadas in India. They were Hindu kings who lived around the Gangetic region of India.

View attachment 1031732

The only stupid are you hubris, delusional and inferior complex ridden Indians, claiming Buddha that was not Indian in any way. India never existed as a nation in history until 1947 British created it.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

The only stupid are you hubris, delusional and inferior complex ridden Indians, claiming Buddha that was not Indian in any way. India never existed as a nation in history until 1947 British created it.

Quite ironic for the Chinese to claim that when their own Buddhist travellers like Xuanzang and Yijing described India as "Yin-du" a nomenclature you still follow to this day Man those Cultural enhancements in Mao's times really destroyed all the records didn't they?

 

[etylo]

Quite ironic for the Chinese to claim that when their own Buddhist travellers like Xuanzang and Yijing described India as "Yin-du" a nomenclature you still follow to this day Man those Cultural enhancements in Mao's times really destroyed all the records didn't they?

It's a geographic name, not a nation.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

It's a geographic name, not a nation.

No shit Sherlock. So, you basically agreed India existed before. You are welcome.

 

[etylo]

No shit Sherlock. So, you basically agreed India existed before. You are welcome.

Do you have comprehension problem, I said India as a nation never existed before 1947.

 

[Vikramaditya-I]

Do you have comprehension problem, I said India as a nation never existed before 1947.

China never existed before its unification either, Germany didn't exist before 1871. Does it matter when the country was unified?

 

[etylo]

China never existed before its unification either, Germany didn't exist before 1871. Does it matter when the country was unified?

You can talk of BS nonsense you want, ask all the people in the world, fool.