Mritunjaya
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2013
- Messages
- 1,221
- Reaction score
- 1
Strictly from a personal standpoint, I really don't understand the hype surrounding this particular case. Indian fisherman routinely find themselves at the receiving end in waters adjoining Sri Lanka and Pakistan. They are shot at/killed and are imprisoned without any legal proceedings or contact with their families. Even sailors in the Merchant Navy have been taken hostage by Somali pirates on numerous occasions. Isn't it a matter of national shame when a Pakistani(and not our government, NGOs or citizens) steps up to rescue our sailors? Is our national pride challenged solely in the case of the perpetrators being Westerners? Isn't that reverse racism?
With the families of the victims and the boat owner duly compensated, this episode already has a better prognosis than the vast majority of cases involving Indian fishermen. Anything beyond this outcome is a bonus but I wouldn't hold my breath for it. This might be hard to take in but it is merely a neutral observation.
Indian fishermen are not routinely fired upon and killed even by Sri Lankan/Pakistani marines. They are capture and imprisoned for reasons of entering waters of a sovereign nation without valid visa/permission. The Two cases are entirely different.
Italy govt. as a sovereign nation gave a written agreement to another sovereign nation, India and renegaded on that agreement.
How would pakistan react if India renegaded on the Indus water treaty ? (which I think we should) ....its a breach of international agreement and questions Italy's credibility for India and rest of the world.
The victims were compensated, but that was a private arrangement between the victims family and the people who compensated them. GoI had no role to play in that. Gets your facts straight.