What's new

It is up to India to try to stop Sheikh Hasina ruining Bangladesh

If BNP leaning towards india then they should be thrown to wolves as well. Its time for people to take on national interest and alternative leadership. But there has been lots of Awami propaganda to give public false impression BNP. Truth is we don't know yet which way things will be moving. Making comments on Awami hyped propaganda report will not help anyone or any cause.

Well, begum zia has reputation of being aposhin netri when it comes to national interest. If she
wanted she counld have went along the lines set by the MUA-FUA dalals to come to power, but she didn't. I believe she is the one of the most patriotic leader of BD and most BNP alas are still very
much loyal to her.
 
What makes U think that India wants to keep BD a vassal??????? How India has made BD a vassal????

The list is very long but let be give you some examples. Indo-bangla 25 year friendship treaty AKA
slave treat singed
just after independence by witch indira.

Indo-Bangladeshi Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's the following 25 friendship treaty signed afterwards in 1972:
(i) The contracting parties solemnly declare that there shall be lasting peace and friendship between the two countries and each side shall respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the other and refrain from interfering in the internal affairs of the other side;
(ii) The contracting parties condemn colonialism and racialism of all forms, and reaffirm their determination to strive for their final and complete elimination;
(iii) The contracting parties reaffirm their faith in the policy of non-alignment and peaceful co-existence as important factors for easing tension in the world, maintaining international peace and security and strengthening national sovereignty and independence;
(iv) The contracting parties shall maintain regular contacts and exchange views with each other on major international problems affecting the interest of both the states;
(v) The contracting parties shall continue to strengthen and widen their mutually advantageous and all round cooperation in the economic, scientific and technical fields, and shall develop mutual cooperation in the fields of trade, transport and communication on the basis of the principles of equality and mutual benefit;
(vi) The contracting parties agree to make joint studies and take joint action in the field of flood control, river basin development and development of hydro-electric power and irrigation;
(vii) Both the parties shall promote relations in the field of arts, literature, education, culture, sports and health;
(viii) In accordance with the ties of friendship existing between the two countries, each of the contracting parties solemnly declare that it shall not enter into or participate in any military alliance directed against the other party. Each of the parties shall refrain from any aggression against the other party and shall not allow the use of its territory for committing any act that may cause military damage to or continue to threat to the security of the other contracting parties;
(ix) Each of the contracting parties shall refrain from giving any assistance to any third party taking part in an armed conflict against the other party. In case if either party is attacked or threatened to attack, the contracting parties shall immediately enter into mutual consultations in order to take necessary measures to eliminate the threat and thus ensure the peace and security of their countries;
(x) Each of the parties solemnly declare that it shall not undertake any commitment, secret or open, towards one or more states which may be incompatible with the present treaty;
(xi) The present treaty is signed for a term of twenty-five years, and shall be renewed by mutual agreement;
(xii) Any differences interpreting any Article of the treaty shall be settled on a bilateral basis by peaceful means in a spirit of mutual respect and understanding
Indo-Bangladeshi Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article 4,5,8,9,10 clearly showed India's malicious intentions.

Article 4 practically eliminated Bangladesh's power to devise an independent foreign policy and made it compulsory for Bangladesh to consult India about any major foreign policy matter.

Article 5 forced Bangladesh to confer most favored nation status on India to clear the way for India to capture Bangladesh's economic market without any restrictions, but Bangladesh being a smaller economy was unable to avail itself of the opportunities of most favored nation status.

Article 8 ensured that if there was a military conflict between Bangladesh and India, Bangladesh, as a weaker power, could not seek help from outside world to protect its territorial integrity.

Article 9 was included to protect India's strategic interest in its insurgency infested North Eastern states by imposing restrictions on Bangladesh to provide help and support to the insurgents, but India itself broke the sanctity of this clause by providing military and political assistance to Shanti Bahini in Chittagong Hill Tracts.

Article 10 restricted Bangladesh's power to sign a defense deal with a third party to improve its armed forces.


• Article 4: Both the nations will hold regular meetings with each other at all levels to discuss major international issues for mutual benefit.

• Article 5: Both the nations will cooperate with each other in the fields of trade, transport and communications on the basis of equality, mutual benefit and the most favored nation principle.

• Article 8: None of the nations will ever enter into a military alliance against each other and will refrain from allowing a third party from using their soil for military purposes that could constitute a threat to national security of either nations.

• Article 9: Both the nations will refrain from providing any assistance to a third party taking part in an armed conflict against either of the nations to ensure regional peace and security.

• Article 10: Neither of the party will undertake any commitment, secret or open, toward one or more states, which may violate the spirit of the treaty.


Article 4 practically eliminated Bangladesh's power to devise an independent foreign policy and made it compulsory for Bangladesh to consult India about any major foreign policy matter.

Article 5 forced Bangladesh to confer most favored nation status on India to clear the way for India to capture Bangladesh's economic market without any restrictions, but Bangladesh being a smaller economy was unable to avail itself of the opportunities of most favored nation status.

Article 8 ensured that if there was a military conflict between Bangladesh and India, Bangladesh, as a weaker power, could not seek help from outside world to protect its territorial integrity.

Article 9 was included to protect India's strategic interest in its insurgency infested North Eastern states by imposing restrictions on Bangladesh to provide help and support to the insurgents, but India itself broke the sanctity of this clause by providing military and political assistance to Shanti Bahini in Chittagong Hill Tracts.

Article 10 restricted Bangladesh's power to sign a defense deal with a third party to improve its armed forces.

By dint of this treaty India was able to diminish Bangladesh's power to protect herself and the right to establish political and economic relations with other nations independently and consequently became the de-facto power over Bangladesh to whom the new born country had to depend for her security and economic development only to lose her relevance as a sovereign nation. Thus the entrapment of Bangladesh was complete.
 
Well, begum zia has reputation of being aposhin netri when it comes to national interest. If she
wanted she counld have went along the lines set by the MUA-FUA dalals to come to power, but she didn't. I believe she is the one of the most patriotic leader of BD and most BNP alas are still very
much loyal to her.

Agreed. Awami League in desperation creating lots propaganda to give false impression on BNP and we should discount these news.
 
The list is very long but let be give you some examples. Indo-bangla 25 year friendship treaty AKA
slave treat singed
just after independence by witch indira.

Indo-Bangladeshi Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's the following 25 friendship treaty signed afterwards in 1972:
(i) The contracting parties solemnly declare that there shall be lasting peace and friendship between the two countries and each side shall respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the other and refrain from interfering in the internal affairs of the other side;
(ii) The contracting parties condemn colonialism and racialism of all forms, and reaffirm their determination to strive for their final and complete elimination;
(iii) The contracting parties reaffirm their faith in the policy of non-alignment and peaceful co-existence as important factors for easing tension in the world, maintaining international peace and security and strengthening national sovereignty and independence;
(iv) The contracting parties shall maintain regular contacts and exchange views with each other on major international problems affecting the interest of both the states;
(v) The contracting parties shall continue to strengthen and widen their mutually advantageous and all round cooperation in the economic, scientific and technical fields, and shall develop mutual cooperation in the fields of trade, transport and communication on the basis of the principles of equality and mutual benefit;
(vi) The contracting parties agree to make joint studies and take joint action in the field of flood control, river basin development and development of hydro-electric power and irrigation;
(vii) Both the parties shall promote relations in the field of arts, literature, education, culture, sports and health;
(viii) In accordance with the ties of friendship existing between the two countries, each of the contracting parties solemnly declare that it shall not enter into or participate in any military alliance directed against the other party. Each of the parties shall refrain from any aggression against the other party and shall not allow the use of its territory for committing any act that may cause military damage to or continue to threat to the security of the other contracting parties;
(ix) Each of the contracting parties shall refrain from giving any assistance to any third party taking part in an armed conflict against the other party. In case if either party is attacked or threatened to attack, the contracting parties shall immediately enter into mutual consultations in order to take necessary measures to eliminate the threat and thus ensure the peace and security of their countries;
(x) Each of the parties solemnly declare that it shall not undertake any commitment, secret or open, towards one or more states which may be incompatible with the present treaty;
(xi) The present treaty is signed for a term of twenty-five years, and shall be renewed by mutual agreement;
(xii) Any differences interpreting any Article of the treaty shall be settled on a bilateral basis by peaceful means in a spirit of mutual respect and understanding
Indo-Bangladeshi Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Peace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article 4,5,8,9,10 clearly showed India's malicious intentions.

Article 4 practically eliminated Bangladesh's power to devise an independent foreign policy and made it compulsory for Bangladesh to consult India about any major foreign policy matter.

Article 5 forced Bangladesh to confer most favored nation status on India to clear the way for India to capture Bangladesh's economic market without any restrictions, but Bangladesh being a smaller economy was unable to avail itself of the opportunities of most favored nation status.

Article 8 ensured that if there was a military conflict between Bangladesh and India, Bangladesh, as a weaker power, could not seek help from outside world to protect its territorial integrity.

Article 9 was included to protect India's strategic interest in its insurgency infested North Eastern states by imposing restrictions on Bangladesh to provide help and support to the insurgents, but India itself broke the sanctity of this clause by providing military and political assistance to Shanti Bahini in Chittagong Hill Tracts.

Article 10 restricted Bangladesh's power to sign a defense deal with a third party to improve its armed forces.


• Article 4: Both the nations will hold regular meetings with each other at all levels to discuss major international issues for mutual benefit.

• Article 5: Both the nations will cooperate with each other in the fields of trade, transport and communications on the basis of equality, mutual benefit and the most favored nation principle.

• Article 8: None of the nations will ever enter into a military alliance against each other and will refrain from allowing a third party from using their soil for military purposes that could constitute a threat to national security of either nations.

• Article 9: Both the nations will refrain from providing any assistance to a third party taking part in an armed conflict against either of the nations to ensure regional peace and security.

• Article 10: Neither of the party will undertake any commitment, secret or open, toward one or more states, which may violate the spirit of the treaty.


Article 4 practically eliminated Bangladesh's power to devise an independent foreign policy and made it compulsory for Bangladesh to consult India about any major foreign policy matter.

Article 5 forced Bangladesh to confer most favored nation status on India to clear the way for India to capture Bangladesh's economic market without any restrictions, but Bangladesh being a smaller economy was unable to avail itself of the opportunities of most favored nation status.

Article 8 ensured that if there was a military conflict between Bangladesh and India, Bangladesh, as a weaker power, could not seek help from outside world to protect its territorial integrity.

Article 9 was included to protect India's strategic interest in its insurgency infested North Eastern states by imposing restrictions on Bangladesh to provide help and support to the insurgents, but India itself broke the sanctity of this clause by providing military and political assistance to Shanti Bahini in Chittagong Hill Tracts.

Article 10 restricted Bangladesh's power to sign a defense deal with a third party to improve its armed forces.

By dint of this treaty India was able to diminish Bangladesh's power to protect herself and the right to establish political and economic relations with other nations independently and consequently became the de-facto power over Bangladesh to whom the new born country had to depend for her security and economic development only to lose her relevance as a sovereign nation. Thus the entrapment of Bangladesh was complete.

Article 4 according to U prohibit Bangladesh a free foreign policy then tell me how anti India Foreign Policy was adopted by BNP???? Did India asked BNP to have an anti India Policy?????

Article 5 This article was formulated to help Bangladesh and also to increase trade bet two nations,India being the large Economy would have benefited Bangladesh more than India. Now dont tell me that by according MFN to India BD killed itself,Pak is also Giving India MFN status to help its own economy not to destroy its economy. Its all trade and cooperation. Bangladesh can get a lot of investments from india. Proposal by Tatas for investment was biggest FDI in the history of BD which died due to politics.

Article 8 Do u want a war with India ?????????? And why U need to go to war with India ?????India will never go to war with Bangladesh a country which it helped to achieve Independence.India has no ambition to take any BD land which it could do after 1971 but never did.

Article 9 Dont tell me that Bangladesh Never helped NE insurgents. NE insurgents got heaven in BD under previous Government in BD.
If BD had any proof India Helping Shanti Bahini they should have brought to Indias concern and infront of Indian and world media. Do not follow Pakistani Model in which they blame India for everything in Baluchistan but can never provide any proof.

Article 10: Neither of the party will undertake any commitment, secret or open, toward one or more states, which may violate the spirit of the treaty.

Bangladesh is having Military deals with China and also Pakistan. Did India stop Khaleda Zia from military relations with Pakistan??? Never

Stop such thinking that India is Ur enemy.
 
Anti-liberation forces, BNP bribed the Economist: Hanif

Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS)

DHAKA, May 26 (BSS)-Academicians, intellectuals and leaders of the ruling Awami League today termed the two articles on the government and Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina carried by the London-based Economist as untrue, unacceptable and contradictory to the ethics of objective journalism.

They were of the views that the articles were the conspiracies of the undemocratic forces and their beneficiaries.

In its Saturday's issue, the UK-based Economist carried two articles titled "Bangladesh's toxic politics: Hello, Delhi" and "Politics in Bangladesh: Banged about" in which it was also came up with an observation "The prime minister sets the country on a dangerous path".

Outright rejecting both the articles of the Economist, Awami eague joint general secretary Mahbub-ul-Alam Hanif said, "The British magazine (Economist) is used to write against Awami League taking bribes from anti-liberation forces and BNP."

He alleged that the newspaper (Economist) carried many reports with malafide intention soon after the present government assumed power.

Condemning the paper's comment "As Sheikh Hasina looks ever more strident, people may start tiptoeing away from her", Hanif referred to the recent survey of the United States' Gallop poll and said it showed 77 percent people of the country kept their trust on Sheikh Hasina.

About the paper's remarks on the caretaker government, he said the Sheikh Hasina government did not cancelled the caretaker system government, rather it was a verdict of the country's apex court and in accordance with the verdict, a bill in this regard was passed in the Jatiya Sangsad (Parliament).

Protesting the comment "It is up to India try to stop Sheikh Hasina ruining Bangladesh", Hanif said, "Bangladesh is an independent and sovereign state. The people elect the country's Prime Minister. Involvement of any third country in its internal affairs is illogical and contradictory to its sovereignty."

Referring to a number of comments of Hillary Clinton and the United States Ambassador in Bangladesh as mentioned in the article, the AL joint secretary said during her recent visit to Dhaka, Hillary Clinton remarked that Bangladesh was gradually developing and the country's democracy has been more consolidated and it is in the right track of transforming into a middle-income state.

But, he regretted that nowhere in its articles, the paper did mention the aforesaid remarks of Hillary Clinton, which bore the testimony to the facts that the Economist wants deliberately to undermine the progress achieved by the present government.

Replying to the article's comment on detaining of 33 leaders of the opposition in jail in a case of arson and arrest of nearly
3,000 BNP leaders and activists, Hanif said, "The Economist
highlighted only on the negative matters."

He referred to the killing of thousands of Awami League leaders and workers including murder of a former minister and a few MPs and 24 party leaders and workers in the August 21 massacre in 2004 during the five-year rule of the BNP-led government.

In reality, Hanif was of the opinion that the Economist has taken the side of those who are opposing the trail of the war criminals and collaborators.

Prof Dr AAMS Arefin Siddique, vice-chancellor of Dhaka University, said, "It's nothing but a well-conceived conspiracy of an undemocratic force of beneficiaries."

He said it's a part of a conspiracy being hatched at a time when Bangladesh under the dynamic leadership of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina is marching ahead in the community of nations upholding its nascent democracy.

Noted academician and historian Prof Dr Syed Anwar Hossain said, "The paper (Economist) has been writing against the present government for quite sometime, but the reason for it is unclear.
However, there is no good intention behind publishing such
articles is crystal clear."

Dr Badiul Alam Mazumdar, Secretary general of an NGO Sujon,
said, "It's a wake up call for the government. We are in a crisis
now, but nobody from outside can resolve our problems."
 
BD and the the every day so of 2 beautiful woman with Indian being the sole Gabbar Singh in the movie.....When will this movie will End?
 
On Topic :
Guys ...No country can save you until your people learn from previous mistakes & make right choices yourself.
You are a free nation,no country should have right to effect your governance including India !!

Off Topic :
Indira Gandhi did wrong in freeing you people as I see ungrateful & idiotic broots here calling names to lady who saved his mothers/ sisters from gang rapes.
Do you think any indian will think seriously till such idiotic creature dwells in this thread??

why dont mods bann such peoples who are insulting other countries legends without any reasons??
 
Here is one advice for Indians, if you believe in Karma, clean up your acts, so people do not catch you red-handed and expose that to the world.
 
Here is one advice for Indians, if you believe in Karma, clean up your acts, so people do not catch you red-handed and expose that to the world.

Keep your intelligent opinions to save your country ...we dont need idiotic suggestions. Only peoples who are successful/Powerful than India deserves right to advice us.

In 1971 ....we saved you once and again here in OP its your people begging India to save your country... dont waste your energy in trolling help your countrymen first !! All the Best !!
 
I don't understand much of what is being said here but good luck bengladeshis in resolving your issues, May Allah be with you.
 
Whom u r trying to point out, is it INDIA?????

who else my friend. U must know that whatever happenned in BD WAS done by indians.
1.The language movement was started by tagore loving indians and their dalals. The brutal crackdown was also done indians wearing **** uniforms. Classic double face yindoos u know.
2.it was the indians who voted mujib the traitor to power and at the same time forced w.pakîstan to deny him power. Bloody basterd.
3.who do u think was behind operation searchlight and similar operations. Again simple indians. All they needed was some pakistani uniform , a few tanks and mc guns etc. And pious pakistani forces got blamed 4 it.
4. And then indians went on raping women killing both bengalis and beharis alike. Forcing millions to flee to india and causing sever economic issue just 4 the heck of of putting islamic pakistan in bad light.
5. Finally when pakistani in order to prevent hindunization of E.pak send its army, the sneaky india send its forces too. Of course the aim was to loot state of art pakistani equipments. Confused ! Ask any BD Worth his salt he will give u the entire list. also just before pakistanis surrenderd indians wearing **** uniforms killed scholars and intelectuals. :(
To cut long story short indians finally broke pakistan into two in order to enslave BD. And contns to do so.
 
Article 4 according to U prohibit Bangladesh a free foreign policy then tell me how anti India Foreign Policy was adopted by BNP???? Did India asked BNP to have an anti India Policy?????

Article 5 This article was formulated to help Bangladesh and also to increase trade bet two nations,India being the large Economy would have benefited Bangladesh more than India. Now dont tell me that by according MFN to India BD killed itself,Pak is also Giving India MFN status to help its own economy not to destroy its economy. Its all trade and cooperation. Bangladesh can get a lot of investments from india. Proposal by Tatas for investment was biggest FDI in the history of BD which died due to politics.

Article 8 Do u want a war with India ?????????? And why U need to go to war with India ?????India will never go to war with Bangladesh a country which it helped to achieve Independence.India has no ambition to take any BD land which it could do after 1971 but never did.

Article 9 Dont tell me that Bangladesh Never helped NE insurgents. NE insurgents got heaven in BD under previous Government in BD.
If BD had any proof India Helping Shanti Bahini they should have brought to Indias concern and infront of Indian and world media. Do not follow Pakistani Model in which they blame India for everything in Baluchistan but can never provide any proof.

Article 10: Neither of the party will undertake any commitment, secret or open, toward one or more states, which may violate the spirit of the treaty.

Bangladesh is having Military deals with China and also Pakistan. Did India stop Khaleda Zia from military relations with Pakistan??? Never

Stop such thinking that India is Ur enemy.

Before comming up with this argument you should have realized that that treaty was suppose to
be in force for 25 years from the day of being signed i.e the treaty officially expired in 1996.
After the political change of 1975 i.e when pres.ZIA came to power by popular sepahi-janata
revolt, BD decided to dump INDIA for good. Pres.ZIA dynamic foreign policy made US ,China and
our muslim brothers in the M.E recognize us. Everything you mentioned happened post-75 when
when India realized that BD is not some Buthan or Sikim.
After 75 indira started backing the
Shanti Bahini insurgency violating Article 9 of the treaty first, knowing full well that BD's political
leadership and intl Community wasn't seeing this slave 25 year treaty in good light. Post-75
BD dumping the treaty doesn't change
the fact that INDIA did indeed tried to make us a vassal by this treaty. You can't deny this, can
you?
Due to massive popular discontent, BAL didn't renew the treaty in 96. But now in 2008
the recent treaties signed with India are not presented in parliament as per the constitution. BAL and
India is playing hide and seek with people of BD. Why the secrecy if there is nothing to hide?

As for India backing Shanti Bahini, well India has been backing insurgency in the region since 47.
BD formation was also by insurgency, LTTE of SL for 30 years and now active insurgency in Baluchistan.
Plenty of proof is there to show indian terrorist activities in S.asia. Shanti Bahini caused havoc
in BD for 30 years before awami indian dalals in 97 decided to give the CHT some amount of autonomy violating the constitution and this was done at a time when the BD army was on its way to
crushing the insurgency permanently. Off course we hate india for always trying to make BD a
vassal via their puppet BAL.
Here's an article in NYT from 1989 talking about India's role in CHT insurgency.
Bangladeshi Insurgents Say India Is Supporting Them - NYTimes.com
And here's one of your own writer who wrote about Indian involvement in CHT:
India backed Shanti Bahini, Burmese rebels: book | Bangladesh | bdnews24.com
 
who else my friend. U must know that whatever happenned in BD WAS done by indians.
1.The language movement was started by tagore loving indians and their dalals. The brutal crackdown was also done indians wearing **** uniforms. Classic double face yindoos u know.
2.it was the indians who voted mujib the traitor to power and at the same time forced w.pakîstan to deny him power. Bloody basterd.
3.who do u think was behind operation searchlight and similar operations. Again simple indians. All they needed was some pakistani uniform , a few tanks and mc guns etc. And pious pakistani forces got blamed 4 it.
4. And then indians went on raping women killing both bengalis and beharis alike. Forcing millions to flee to india and causing sever economic issue just 4 the heck of of putting islamic pakistan in bad light.
5. Finally when pakistani in order to prevent hindunization of E.pak send its army, the sneaky india send its forces too. Of course the aim was to loot state of art pakistani equipments. Confused ! Ask any BD Worth his salt he will give u the entire list. also just before pakistanis surrenderd indians wearing **** uniforms killed scholars and intelectuals. :(
To cut long story short indians finally broke pakistan into two in order to enslave BD. And contns to do so.

@ To a greater extent you are right.
 
Back
Top Bottom