adelphi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 449
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Could be but nonetheless it's a good achievement. Something they can build upon & mature.I think this video is in fast forward motion that's why you confused
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be but nonetheless it's a good achievement. Something they can build upon & mature.I think this video is in fast forward motion that's why you confused
No need to get sentimental mate.If you're unwilling to listen to experts them no one can help you. Never go to a doctor whenever you get sick, just do whatever feels right, ok guy?
Now that you have explained it with a bit of arrogance i stillI thank you for that. It is indeed a limitation of tailess configiration. You are also right that it needs to bleed off energy it gained therefore a mechanism is needed which to me doesn't seem very effective at this stage. So what wrong did I suggest that I need to go to see a doctor?Not that you deserve a technical response but for the broader audiences' sake: it's coming in fast because:
A. It's a tailless Delta configuration like the shuttle so it has higher landing speeds and/or higher angle of attacks.
B. It has gained a lot of kinetic energy in its flight and bleeding off that energy requires S-maneuvers, which are either not implemented yet or are not very effective at this scale.
It's all about a safe landing.If anything the higher speed makes the landing even more impressive.
In case you missed it, there are no passengers, this is a satellite launch vehicle and most importantly a scaled-down version. So, I'm sorry if the drone pilot decided to swerve a bit to make it stop earlier, next time we will ask for a perfect landing because Sir. Adelphi didn't like the way the pilot swerved.Well then you haven't seen good landings I'm afraid. Unless your pilot is a former rikshaw driver that's not how you stop anything on a runway.
probably former IAF fast jet remote pilot here, wdyt ?sorry if the drone pilot decided to swerve a bit to make it stop earlier
I have a better suggestion. Hire a proper drone pilot & not a former rikshaw driver. Why make a product look bad by hiring a person not meant for the job.In case you missed it, there are no passengers, this is a satellite launch vehicle and most importantly a scaled-down version. So, I'm sorry if the drone pilot decided to swerve a bit to make it stop earlier, next time we will ask for a perfect landing because Sir. Adelphi didn't like the way the pilot swerved.
I think they might do few more tests of this scaled version, before they build the full scale right?Yes indeed
this was just a tech demo scaled down version, can't wait for the real thing.
and then, next step is a desi manned space shuttle !
US does seem to have ditched/retired the manned shuttle and have been using soyuz? and ESA for manned rocket and reentry to and from the ISS, right ?I think they might do few more tests of this scaled version, before they build the full scale right?
I wonder though, even US ditched the space shuttle concept. How far are we going to have success and issues here?
Probably autonomous. Looks too perfect for a human. But that's just my feeling.probably former IAF fast jet remote pilot here, wdyt ?
also, more vids, this ones more raw:
Yes and do you know the reason for them ditching it? They found it cost prohibitive, if I remember it correctly. Yes they are now dependent on Soyuz modules, to take stuff to ISS.US does seem to have ditched/retired the manned shuttle and have been using soyuz? and ESA for manned rocket and reentry to and from the ISS, right ?
dunno what this tech demo was for, maybe they're planning some X37b type secret mission mini drone shuttle ? .. who knows
primarily military application one can guess, and any indigenous gen. purpose uses discovered from it will be much downstream from here.
der but durust !
I imagine ISRO is full of test pilotsProbably autonomous. Looks too perfect for a human. But that's just my feeling.
They're a decent cheap alternative for space launches so far, SpaceX is of course much ahead but ours in not entirely a commercial venture with this reentry shuttle thing.Yes and do you know the reason for them ditching it? They found it cost prohibitive, if I remember it correctly. Yes they are now dependent on Soyuz modules, to take stuff to ISS.
Don't think this is a X37b styled one, this is a ISRO idea actually.
While SpaceX went with self landing rockets, ISRO went the other way. It's been some years, since they announced this. Now we are seeing a working demo.
Supposed to help with reducing launch of satellites, then help with our space station too in future.
I have full confidence on ISRO but, it has to be cost effective to compete with SpaceX.
You are right, it is a autonomous landing. Straight from horse's mouth, released from a Chinook helicopter from a height of 4.5 km.Probably autonomous. Looks too perfect for a human. But that's just my feeling.
Well it all depends on funding doesn't it? ISRO never got too many funds, so they have to make do.I imagine ISRO is full of test pilots
manned one's ka time jab aayenga, it'll be military fast guys at the controls.
They're a decent cheap alternative for space launches so far, SpaceX is of course much ahead but ours in not entirely a commercial venture with this reentry shuttle thing.
ISRO toh abhi experimantal student project sats bhi launch kar rahe hai, which is very nice <3
agree, they going well.. far may they reach !
what cannot be cured must be enduredWhile it may sound Sci-fi now, won't take long before space mining becomes reality. We shouldn't be left out of it, and then try to hitch a ride with someone who will milk us for money. Is happening in Defence sector till date.
Baba ji ki jai ho - acha gyan haiwhat cannot be cured must be endured