Those here who believe the zionist entity is a mere "outpost" of the US, and/or that western regimes are holding (zionist) Jews in contempt, seriously need to ponder the following facts:
- Why is it that out of all lobbies, the zionst one happens to be the most powerful and the most influential one, not just in the USA but across the west? How come that a candidate at whatever election can forget about getting elected if AIPAC has an issue with it?
- Why is it that under the post-WW2 political order of the west, nothing is sacred, everything can be derided, ridiculed, insulted, including religion and God - except for the Holocaust (and perhaps topics such as the substitute, freemason religion of "human rights")...? Contravening this principle will result in judicial consequences including imprisonment, or social exclusion at best, depending on the national legislation.
- Why is it that zionists (not least Jewish ones at that) hold most prominent positions within the financial sector of the USA and other western states? As someone used to say: grant me control over the banks in a given country, and I will need no other asset in order to rule over that same country.
- Why is it that zionists (not least Jewish ones at that) happen to be largely in control of the media in America and elsewhere in the west? Now if a goy points to this fact, they will be blasted for "antisemitism", so let's cite a person of Jewish ascendance confirming this with respect to the US film industry and soft war weapon commonly referred to as "Hollywood":
I have never been so upset by a poll in my life.
www.latimes.com
- Why is it that zionists (not least Jewish ones at that) came to be disproportionately represented at Ivy League academia in the US? Again, from the horse's mouth:
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/1992/11/16/harvard-is-a-home-for-jewish/
"
Today, one in four students at the College is Jewish. And several top University administrators are of Jewish descent--including Provost Jerry R. Green, who last week gave a talk on how lessons from the Judaic tradition of moral law could benefit the Harvard administration."
- How come that according to a knowledgeable Jewish rabbi, the true ideological basis of western secular and liberal "democratic" regimes, namely freemasonry, is essentially an avatar of Jewish mysticism ie Kabbalah? How come globalist messianism, a core masonic belief, is perfectly in line with deviationist zionist messianism?
- How come that the USA regime will use taxpayer money from its citizens to grant massive subsidies to the zionist occupation regime and its repressive military apparatus?
- How come every president of the USA regime will go out of their way praising the unshakable, unquestionable bond that exists between Washington and Tel Aviv, with specimens such as acting USA president Joseph Biden going as far as claiming that US "culture" is essentially Isra"el"i culture?
Do I really need to go on...?
None of the above squares with the notion that the zionist apartheid regime represents but a mere neo-colonial type of "outpost" to Washington. Quite to the contrary. Does any of this sound like the way (neo-)colonial masters usually treat their subjects? Give me a break.
And mind you, none of the above stems from any "internet conspiracy theories", but from mainstram media sources as well as books published on the subject.
At most, we may consider as Supreme Leader Khamenei (ha) does, that in certain ways the US is subservient to the zionist entity while in certain other ways, it'd be the other way around. But under no circumstances can the regime in Tel Aviv simply be considered a subjugated pawn manipulated by the US regime. No way.
Concerning the argument according to which Jews historically suffered persecution in the west: historically, yes. But it's been quite some time since this has no longer been the case. And even in the worst periods of persecution during the Middle Ages, Jewish elites had managed to boost themselves into influential positions (foremost in the financial sector). There's ample literature on the topic, do look it up. To imagine that current ruling elites in the west are judeophobic, let alone motivated by a desire to challenge zionism, is really far off.
As for the claim that the British somehow "feared" Muslims could take over Palestine due to the precedent of the Crusades, and hence established the zionist regime to serve as a bulwark against said eventuality, it is so outlandish that it hardly deserves a reply, not least because by the time the British took over Palestine from the defunct Ottoman empire, Muslim powers had been on the decline or simply non-existing for centuries, with western imperialists overshadowing them in every respect. Now yes, it's not as if British rulers weren't superstitious (after all, the latest documented cases of court "magicians" in London, such as John Dee, are no older than 500 years), but still, this is simply offbeat.
.
