The last time a Pakistani soldier could claim to be fighting for one's own country was 1965. Since then its soldiery have fought for the Army against their own country or served as paid mercenaries: in 1971 to kill their Eastern brethren,
no the mission was to kill indian-backed terrorists....we did a good job of that, the real issue was political.....the Army was the one pushing for a political solution, it was Z.A. Bhutto who insisted on boots. Army only felt compelled to go in when indian-backed terrorists let loose their dogs
paid mercenaries? i DARE you to live on a soldier's salary. What would you know
in the Gulf states to the 1990s, in Kargil to prevent peace, in Swat to forestall the Army's dissolution in the face of anarchy.
Gulf States since we had defence pacts with them, Kargil because of movements of indian armoured columns and other posturing (which is never talked about by the stephen cohens such as yourself)
Swat -- a noble campaign, which is why Swatis chant pro-army slogans. What we did in Swat is your envy. With trillions, you couldnt even tame Kabul.
tell me, why are American soldiers dying for israel? And where do your loyalties lie anyways?
The reason the nation looks up to the Army is decades of Army-inspired propaganda added to the corruption and incompetence of politicians and the legal system, which the Army has worked hard to sustain by destroying the school system to enforce ignorance.
au contraire.....the army actually has built many schools, and no -- they arent wholly run, "owned" or administered by the army either!!!
(talk to Xeric about this -- he'll enlighten you more)
i'll help you get in touch with Dr. Ehtisham Ahmad; even he conceeds that when it comes to corruption, inefficiency, graft etc. --- Army is the least of all "suspects"
please come back when you are more informed on this subject.....dont believe everything you read in New-York-Slimes