Aslan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2009
- Messages
- 4,551
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
I watched the disgraceful Islamophobic rantings on the BBC and Sky News last night in mounting disbelief. Security correspondent and security expert vied with each other to tell us that the dreadful attacks in Norway were the work of al-Qaida. One extraordinary American, introduced as from a Centre for Combating Extremism, explained that these Norwegian jihadists had international links and plans to attack London and the New York subway. Norway was a target, we were repeatedly told, because of its NATO membership.
There was at least six solid hours of this poisonous bullshit. I did not pick up on one single person who said that this probably was not Islamic terrorism despite the glaringly obvious fact that the atrocity had a Norwegian domestic political agenda, being an attack on the Prime Ministers office, and on a youth camp of the governing party. The internet was buzzing for hours with the news that the attacker on Utoya Island was blonde, without the broadcast media mentioning it. The American security expert I mention above had that base covered he had obviously seen those reports, but did not mention them. However he said that jihadist groups had probably recruited European looking operatives to carry out the attacks, because they were aware that security services consciously or unconsciously operated racial profiling.
This morning Al Jazeera and Russia Today were carrying the news that the attacker was Anders Breivik and even a picture of him while the BBC and Sky still were not, and while they had stopped the blatant Islamophobic ranting, had still not admitted it was not an Islamic militant attack.
I would love to believe that this incident would cause the media to reassess the value of the numerous security experts whose companies, institutes, funding, profile and standards of living have been spectacularly boosted by the War on Terror. But I doubt it.
All terrorism is terrible. Islamic extremist terrorism is terrible. But not all terrorism is Islamic extremist. To presume it is, is just as valid as to assume that any shooting in the UK is carried out by a black person. If the BBC reacted to the next news of a shooting or stabbing, by six hours about crime in the black community, when it turned out the perpetrators are white, there would rightly be outrage. This is no different.
UPDATE
The mainstream media and those Security experts are now struggling to cover up and justify their blatant Islamophobia. The New York Times was right at the forefront of the Islamophobic ranting, attributing the bombing to a non-existent Jihadist group and then being quoted all across the airwaves as the authority for that attribution. It has now published this amazing self-justificatory bullshit:
Norway has about 550 soldiers and three medevac helicopters in northern Afghanistan, a Norwegian defense official said. The government has indicated that it will continue to support the operations as long as the alliance needs partners on the ground.
Terrorism specialists said that even if the authorities ultimately ruled out Islamic terrorism as the cause of Fridays assaults, other kinds of groups or individuals were mimicking Al Qaedas brutality and multiple attacks.
If it does turn out to be someone with more political motivations, it shows these groups are learning from what they see from Al Qaeda, said Brian Fishman, a counterterrorism researcher at the New America Foundation in Washington. One lesson I take away from this is that attacks, especially in the West, are going to move to automatic weapons.
All the mainstream media are rushing to take down their crazed Islamophobic rantings from their websites this morning the BBC did it just twenty minutes ago, and had a short period in consequence when they had nothing up on Norway. I expect newspaper sites will be doing the same. Print editions, of course, do not have that ability.
Mainstream media all the hate and lies they can peddle. What would really be an interesting public inquiry, would be the links between security and defence correspondents and the security services whose propaganda they spread. I should love to know what security service briefings were behind yesterdays Islamophobic lies.
Craig Murray » Blog Archive » Islamophobia Run Wild
There was at least six solid hours of this poisonous bullshit. I did not pick up on one single person who said that this probably was not Islamic terrorism despite the glaringly obvious fact that the atrocity had a Norwegian domestic political agenda, being an attack on the Prime Ministers office, and on a youth camp of the governing party. The internet was buzzing for hours with the news that the attacker on Utoya Island was blonde, without the broadcast media mentioning it. The American security expert I mention above had that base covered he had obviously seen those reports, but did not mention them. However he said that jihadist groups had probably recruited European looking operatives to carry out the attacks, because they were aware that security services consciously or unconsciously operated racial profiling.
This morning Al Jazeera and Russia Today were carrying the news that the attacker was Anders Breivik and even a picture of him while the BBC and Sky still were not, and while they had stopped the blatant Islamophobic ranting, had still not admitted it was not an Islamic militant attack.
I would love to believe that this incident would cause the media to reassess the value of the numerous security experts whose companies, institutes, funding, profile and standards of living have been spectacularly boosted by the War on Terror. But I doubt it.
All terrorism is terrible. Islamic extremist terrorism is terrible. But not all terrorism is Islamic extremist. To presume it is, is just as valid as to assume that any shooting in the UK is carried out by a black person. If the BBC reacted to the next news of a shooting or stabbing, by six hours about crime in the black community, when it turned out the perpetrators are white, there would rightly be outrage. This is no different.
UPDATE
The mainstream media and those Security experts are now struggling to cover up and justify their blatant Islamophobia. The New York Times was right at the forefront of the Islamophobic ranting, attributing the bombing to a non-existent Jihadist group and then being quoted all across the airwaves as the authority for that attribution. It has now published this amazing self-justificatory bullshit:
Norway has about 550 soldiers and three medevac helicopters in northern Afghanistan, a Norwegian defense official said. The government has indicated that it will continue to support the operations as long as the alliance needs partners on the ground.
Terrorism specialists said that even if the authorities ultimately ruled out Islamic terrorism as the cause of Fridays assaults, other kinds of groups or individuals were mimicking Al Qaedas brutality and multiple attacks.
If it does turn out to be someone with more political motivations, it shows these groups are learning from what they see from Al Qaeda, said Brian Fishman, a counterterrorism researcher at the New America Foundation in Washington. One lesson I take away from this is that attacks, especially in the West, are going to move to automatic weapons.
All the mainstream media are rushing to take down their crazed Islamophobic rantings from their websites this morning the BBC did it just twenty minutes ago, and had a short period in consequence when they had nothing up on Norway. I expect newspaper sites will be doing the same. Print editions, of course, do not have that ability.
Mainstream media all the hate and lies they can peddle. What would really be an interesting public inquiry, would be the links between security and defence correspondents and the security services whose propaganda they spread. I should love to know what security service briefings were behind yesterdays Islamophobic lies.
Craig Murray » Blog Archive » Islamophobia Run Wild
